Legal receptor and legal donation in the constitutionalism of states in the context of globalization: socio-philosophical and educational aspects


https://doi.org/10.15372/PEMW20190410

Full Text:




Abstract

Introduction. The socio-philosophical and philosophical-legal analysis of the processes of law components exchange (legal norms, articles, prin­ciples, parts of legislation, legal ideology, etc.) be­tween legal systems (legal spheres) of different coun­tries has shown that this exchange takes place both in history and modernity. Its comprehension first of all began in Western law, starting from the Middle Ages. The assimilation of law components by some coun­tries from other countries is called the legal recep­tion. Historically, from the Middle Ages to the present day, the reception of Roman law componets by Euro­pean states has been the first and most widespread. But in the XX and especially at the beginning of the XXI centuries (in the era of globalization), the recep­tion of the components of law in the system of inter­actions of simultaneously existing states, as well as the interactions of countries and the international le­gal environment, developed significantly. In this case, it became necessary to study the legal mechanisms and patterns of legal interchange of the law compo­nents on an international interaction scale, in the era of globalization. The purposes of the article are: to consider some patterns of interactions between legal systems of different countries and other legal enti­ties, in the context of globalization (including legal receptions) from the standpoint of social philosophy; to identify the necessary categorical apparatus, to show the significance of introducing the results into professional legal (law) education. Methodology and research methods: dialectical and system-philosoph­ical approaches, methods of legal comparative studies, induction and deduction, analysis and synthesis, integration of the results. Results. There have been investigated the interstate processes of legal systems components interchange which lead to carrying out the reception of law by some countries and donation of legal components from other countries and legal entities. This type of diverse supranational legal rela­tions is designated and investigated in the article as the dialectic of the processes of legal receptivity and legal donation. Legal entities, participants in these processes, are designated as legal recipients and le­gal donors. The historically formed stages of legal re­ceptivity are defined: in time parameters from the past to the present; in the time parameters of the present. Different types of classifications of legal receptions have been grouped (ten such types have been iden­tified). The process of legal donation from leading countries and from international law has also been investigated; its main forms are defined as friendly, aggressive-aggressive, manipulative and competitive legal donation. It is shown that countries – non-inde­pendent legal recipients – are in the most dependent position. The specifics of legal reception – donation processes in modern Russian constitutionalism and in Russian law as a whole have been identified. Conclu­sion. The relevance of including the main laws of le­gal receptivity and legal donation as separate topics in professional legal education in the era of global­ization is substantiated.


About the Author

М. N. Kokina
Altai State Medical University of the Ministry of Health of Russia
Russian Federation

Maria N. Kokina – head of Information and Analysis

656038, Barnaul, Lenin Avenue, 40–228



References

1. Aznagulova G. M. Reception of law as a form of interaction of national legal systems. Dis. for a job…. cand. legal Sciences: 12.00.01. Ufa, BashSU Publ., 2003, 185 p.

2. Dudko A. I. Reception in constitutional law: concept and classification. Constitutional and municipal law, 2009, no. 5, pp. 5–7.

3. Erdomaev G. G. Reception as a form of interaction of international law and constitutional law of the Russian Federation. Constitutional and municipal law, 2009, no. 15, pp. 7–10.

4. Kuryshev E. Yu. Reception in Russian law. Dis. for a job…. cand. legal Sciences: 12.00.01. Saratov, Sarat. state Acad. Law Publ., 2005, 194 p.

5. Parshkova N. V. The category of «reception» in modern legal literature. Law and State: Theory and Practice, 2012, no. 7 (91), pp. 24–29.

6. Rybakov V. A. Reception of law: general theoretical issues. Monograph. Omsk, Omsk State University Publ., 2009, 278 p.

7. Tkachenko S. V. Reception of Western law in Russia: problems of interaction of subjects: monograph. Samara, Samara University Publ., 2008, 535 p.

8. Bartoshek M. Roman law: (concept, terms, definitions). Per. from Czech. Moscow, Yurid. lit. Publ., 1989, 447 p.

9. Kosarev A. I. Roman private law: a textbook for universities. Moscow, Jurisprudence Publ., 2007, 192 p.

10. Tkachenko S. V. Reception of Roman law: questions of theory and history. Dis. for a job…. cand. legal Sciences: 12.00.01. Moscow, Modern. gum. Academy Publ., 2006, 187 p.

11. Tomsinov V. A. Reception of Roman law in Western Europe in the Middle Ages. Ancient Law IVS ANTIQVVM, 1998, no. 1 (3), pp. 160–175.

12. Kharitonov E. O. Fundamentals of Roman private law. Rostov-on-Don, Phoenix Publ., 1999, 413 p.

13. Engels F. Labor movement in America. Preface to the American edition of «The Position of the Working Class in England»(p. 345–353). Marx K., Engels F. Compositions. 2nd ed. Moscow, Politizdat Publ., vol. 21, pp. 347.

14. Harutyunyan G. G. Constitutional development in the mirror of social transformation. Journal of Constitutional Justice, 2010, no. 3, pp. 34–36.

15. Charlet R. Legal transplantations and political mutations: the reception of constitutional law in Russia and the new independent states. Constitutional law: East European Review, 1999, no. 2, pp. 18.

16. Anichkin E. S., Kokina M. N. Types of reception in Russian constitutionalism. Eurasian Law Journal, 2015, no. 5 (84), pp. 125–127.

17. Dudko A. I. Reception in the constitutional law of Russia. Dis. for a job…. cand. legal Sciences: 12.00.02. Chelyabinsk, ChelSU Publ., 2010, 176 p.

18. Ilchenko T. Yu. Reception of the Russian constitution. Law and state: theory and practice, 2015, no. 9 (129), pp. 47–50.

19. Kochetkov V. V. Modern Russian constitutionalism: the reception of public law institutions or the implementation of values?. Lex russica, 2015, no. 11, pp. 47–55.

20. Kulipanova N. V., Kokina M. N. Mechanisms for adopting constitutional-legal norms and their reflection in legal education: the sociocultural aspect. Philosophical, sociological and pedagogical problems of modern education. Sat. scientific works according to the mat. scientific-practical conf. (Barnaul, 09.2019). Barnaul, AltGPU Publ., 2019, pp. 118–122.

21. Parshkova N. V. The definition of continuity in the reception of law: a general theoretical aspect. Questions of modern jurisprudence: collection of books. Art. by mater. VIII int. scientific-practical conf. Novosibirsk, SibAK Publ., 2012, Novosibirsk, ECOR-book Publ., 2012, pp. 12–15.

22. Krasnova N. N. Global transformations of human rights and legal education. Professional education in the modern world, 2018, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 2194–2201.

23. Yatsenko M. P., Boyarsky M. A. Features of the study of the transformation of the national state in the global world. Professional education in the modern world, 2018, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 2202–2212.

24. Kuzmenko K. A. Legal security in legal education and in the system of constitutional legislation. Professional education in the modern world, 2017, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 991–996.

25. Kulipanova N. V., Orlova N. P., Ushakova E. V., Nalivaiko N. V., Parshikov V. I. Philosophy of law and philosophy of education: cognitive and practical aspects of interaction. Professional education in the modern world, 2011, no. 3, pp. 16–25.

26. Moroz Ye. F. Education system in ensuring national security of developed and developing states. Professional education in the modern world, 2015, no. 2 (17), pp. 48–57.

27. Tabakaev Yu. V., Krasnova N. N., Kuzmenko K. A. Actualization of the integrated methodology in the philosophy of law, constitutional law and legal education. Professional education in the modern world, 2017, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 985–990.

28. Kokina M. N., Kulipanova N. V. Legal receptor and donation in Russian law on family issues / Family in the XXI century: problems and prospects: Sat. articles on the materials of II Vseros. scientific-practical Conf., 12.2018 Barnaul: IP Kolmogorov I. A., 2019. pp. 90–96.

29. Kokina M. N. Dialectics of the relations of receptor-donation in law, traditionalism – anti-traditionalism in the legal systems of countries and the problems of constitutional transformations in modern Russia. Bulletin of the Institute for the Development of the Noosphere, 2019, no. 6 (8), pp. 70–106.

30. Reception. Great Soviet Encyclopedia. Available at: https://dic.academic.ru/dic.nsf/bse/127372/ Reception

31. Reception. Legal Encyclopedia, 2015. Available at: https://yuridicheskaya_encyclopediya.academic.ru/9820/

32. Lafitsky V. I. On the legal heritage of Russia and its revival in the struggle for law. Monograph. Moscow, Justicinform Publ., 2018, 106 p.

33. Kireevsky I. V. On the nature of the enlightenment of Europe and its attitude towards the enlightenment of Russia. Reason on the path to truth. Moscow, The rule of faith, 2002, pp. 151–213.

34. Tkachenko S. V. Reception of law: ideological component. Samara, SamGAPS Publ., 2005, 193 p.

35. Kokina M. N. Modern problems of Russian constitutionalism in legal education. Philosophical, sociological and pedagogical problems of modern education. Sat. scientific tr according to the mat. scientific-practical conf. (Barnaul, 09.2019). Barnaul, AltGPU Publ., 2019, pp. 122–126.


Supplementary files

For citation: Kokina М.N. Legal receptor and legal donation in the constitutionalism of states in the context of globalization: socio-philosophical and educational aspects. Professional education in the modern world. 2019;9(4):3224-3233. https://doi.org/10.15372/PEMW20190410

Views: 366

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2224-1841 (Print)