The sacred and the profane in education: strategies for the survival of pedagogical ethos in the AI era
https://doi.org/10.20913/2224-1841-2026-2-8
Abstract
Introduction. The article, from the perspective of social philosophy, analyzes the anthropological foundations of the traditional education model, challenged by the introduction of artificial intelligence into the modern educational space. Based on the classical dichotomy of the «sacred» and the «profane» (É. Durkheim, M. Eliade), education is considered as a ritual of initiation, where the teacher-mediator guides the student from fragmentary knowledge to systemic understanding.
Purpose setting. The key to identifying the deep-seated causes of the crisis in education was the analysis of the current state of the pedagogical ethos, conditioned by the desacralization of knowledge and the authority of the teacher in the digital age, as well as the development of specific strategies for restoring the sacred status of education.
Methodology and methods of the study. Conceptual analysis, supplemented by theories of simulacra (J. Baudrillard) and instrumental reason (J. Habermas), allows us to reveal the essence of the crisis: AI, by monopolizing access to information and simulating educational rituals (e.g., writing papers), desacralizes knowledge and profanes the role of the teacher to that of a controller of formal procedures.
Results. As a result of the research, three strategies for renewing the pedagogical ethos are proposed: 1) transformation of the teacher's role into that of a «discourse master,» focusing on meaningmaking through dialogue (M. Bakhtin, H.‑G. Gadamer) and problem-based learning; 2) re-sacralization of cognition by emphasizing personal intellectual effort and project-based activity within the framework of constructivism (J. Piaget, L. Vygotsky); 3) de-sacralization of AI, treating it as a tool for developing critical thinking (B. Latour, M. Heidegger).
Conclusion. The challenge posed by AI creates a historic opportunity to return education to its original meaning as a path of personal transformation through dialogue and intellectual effort within a new digital ecosystem.
Keywords
About the Author
M. P. RomanovRussian Federation
Marat P. Romanov – master, specialization in History, Assistant
90 Mira Ave., Krasnoyarsk, 660049
References
1. Durkheim E. Elementary Forms of Religious Life: The Totemic System in Australia. Transl. from French by A. Appolonov and T. Kotel'nikova; scientific ed. by A. Appolonov. Moscow, Delo Publishing House, RANEPA Publ., 2018, 736 p. (In Russ.)
2. Eliade M. The Sacred and the Profane. Transl. from French, foreword and comments by N.K. Garbovsky. Moscow, Moscow State University Press, 1994, 144 p. (In Russ.)
3. Aristotle. Works: In 4 vols. Vol. 4. Transl. from Ancient Greek; Gen. ed. by A. I. Dovatur. Moscow, Mysl' Publ., 1983, 830 p. (In Russ.)
4. Bourdieu P. The practical sense. Paris, Les Éditions de Minuit Publ., 1980, 475 p.
5. McLuhan M. Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. Introduction by Lewis H. Lapham. Cambridge, Mass., MIT Press Publ., 1994, XXI, 365 p.
6. Baudrillard J. Simulacres et simulation. Paris, Éditions Galilée, 1981, 235 p.
7. Habermas J. The Theory of Communicative Action. Transl. from German by A. K. Sudakov. Moscow, Ves' Mir Publ., 2022, 880 p. (In Russ.)
8. Postman N. Technopoly: The Surrender of Culture to Technology. New York, Alfred A. Knopf, 1992, XI, 222 p.
9. Plato. Theaetetus. Transl. from Greek, notes by V. Serezhnikov; ed. by V. Val'bek. Moscow: Gosudarstvennoe sotsial'no-ekonomicheskoe izdatel'stvo Publ., 1936, 193 p. (In Russ.)
10. Gadamer H.‑G. Truth and Method: Foundations of Philosophical Hermeneutics. Transl. from German; gen. ed. and introd. by B.N. Bessonov. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1988, 704 p. (In Russ.)
11. Bakhtin M.M. Problems of Dostoevsky's Poetics. Moscow, ImWerden-Verlag Publ., 2002, 167 p. URL: https://imwerden.de/pdf/bachtin_poetika_dostoevsky.pdf (accessed 12.24.2025). (InRuss.)
12. Freire P. Pedagogy of the Oppressed. Transl. from Portuguese by M.I. Mal'tseva-Samojlovich, I. Piven'. Moscow, KoLibri Publ., 2018, 288 p. (In Russ.)
13. Piaget Jean. Psychology of Intelligence. Saint Petersburg, Piter Publ., 2004, 192 p. (In Russ.)
14. Vygotsky L.S. Thinking and Speech. Edited and with an introductory article by V. Kolbanovsky. Moscow, Gosudarstvennoe sotsial'no-ekonomicheskoe izdatel'stvo Publ., 1934,323 p. (In Russ.)
15. Polanyi M. Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy. London, Routledge Publ., 1958 (corrected edition 1962), 493 p.
16. Foucault M. Hermeneutics of the Subject: A Course of Lectures Delivered at the Collège de France in the 1981– 1982 Academic Year. Transl. from French by A.G. Pogonyajlo. Saint Petersburg, Nauka Publ., 2007, 677 p. (In Russ.)
17. Kruglova I.N. «Samozabota (Care of the Self)»: sociogenetic aspects of the genealogy of subjectivity. «Care of the Self» as an educational practice of the modern classical university: collection of articles and materials of the international scientific conference (November 24–25, 2017). Executive editor G. I. Petrova. Tomsk, Publishing House of Tomsk University, 2018, pp. 50–59. (In Russ.)
18. Heidegger M. The Question Concerning Technology. Transl. from German by V.V. Bibikhin. Heidegger M. Time and Being: Articles and Speeches. Moscow, Respublika Publ., 1993, pp. 221–237. (In Russ.)
19. Latour B. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005, 301 p.
20. Frankfurt H.G. On Bullshit: A Logical-Philosophical Study. Transl. from English by M. Osion; ed. by G. Pavlovsky, I. Chechen. Moscow, Evropa Publ., 2008, 120 p. (In Russ.)
21. Romanov, M. P. The specifics of theological education in the system of modern scientific knowledge. Professional education in the modern world, 2025, no. 15 (3), pp. 586–592. (In Russ.)
22. Nussbaum M. Not for Profit. Why Democracy Needs the Humanities. Transl. from English. Moscow, Higher School of Economics Publishing House, 2014, 192 p. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Romanov M.P. The sacred and the profane in education: strategies for the survival of pedagogical ethos in the AI era. Professional education in the modern world. 2026;16(2):241-248. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.20913/2224-1841-2026-2-8
JATS XML















