.png)
.png)
Email this article 
The use of modular-rating technology of teaching mathematics to students of Altai State Agricultural University
https://doi.org/10.20913/2618-7515-2022-2-12
Abstract
Introduction. New requirements are put forward for the organization of educational process, and improving the quality of training of graduates.
Purpose setting. Therefore, teachers are faced with the need to apply modular-rating training technology which instantly reacts to changes in the situation in the labor market and can adjust the specialist model. It is democratic in its principles, content, and organization of the educational process. Modular-rating technology provides individualization of educational programs and the ways of their assimilation depending on the abilities and interests of students.
Methodology of the study. The authors carried out modular structuring of the “Mathematics” course; methodological support (tests, individual tasks, etc.) of the modular-rating program was developed. A special role in the technology of modular-rating education is assigned to control over the knowledge of students, the authors used current, midterm and fi control. The quality of knowledge and skills of students in mastering the module was determined by various control methods: oral and written survey, control work, individual task, calculate and graphic work, etc. In addition, a testing method was used. To assess the effectiveness of student educational activities, a rating is used which is determined by points set in a selected unifi scale with a clear gradation of the level of theoretical knowledge, practical skills and abilities. The rating is formed during the entire period of the student training.
Results. In modern conditions, higher education is faced with the tasks of forming a specialist with stable incentives for further professional self-improvement, activation and development of student cognitive abilities, differentiation of training content and individualization of pedagogical infl in accordance with the level of student training.
Conclusion. The authors conclude that one of the effective ways to solve these problems is to train students according to the modular-rating system.
About the Authors
M. V. KoksharovaRussian Federation
Marina V. Koksharova – Candidate of Pedagogical Sciences, Associate Professor of the Department of Mathematics, Mechanics and Engineering Graphics, Faculty of Engineering,
98 Krasnoarmeyskiy Ave., Barnaul, 656049
S. V. Morozova
Russian Federation
Svetlana V. Morozova – Candidate of Physical and Mathematical Sciences, Associate Professor of the Department of Mathematics, Mechanics and Engineering Graphics, Faculty of Engineering
98 Krasnoarmeyskiy Ave., Barnaul, 656049
O. G. Belchikova
Russian Federation
Olga G. Belchikova – Candidate of Technical Sciences, Associate Professor of the Department of Mathematics, Mechanics and Engineering Graphics, Faculty of Engineering
98 Krasnoarmeyskiy Ave., Barnaul, 656049
References
1. Kukushkin V. S. (ed.) Pedagogical technologies: a textbook for students of pedagogical specialties. Rostov-onDon, Mart, 2002, 320 p. (In Russ.)
2. Thiessen D. Innovations in teacher education: a review of recent literature. Ontario, Ministry of Education a. Training Publ., 1993, 133 p.
3. Manuilov B., Fedotov I., Blagoveshchenskaya M. Modern technologies in engineering education. Higher education in Russia, 2003, no. 3, pp. 117–123. (In Russ.)
4. Yanushkevich F. Teaching technology in the system of higher education. Moscow, Higher school, 1986, 135 p. (In Russ.)
5. Yutsyavichene P. Theory and practice of modular training. Kaunas, Shviesa, 1989, 272 p. (In Russ.)
6. Bogomolova O. B. Modular-rating teaching technology: an example of methodological development of a lesson in mathematics. Distance and virtual training, 2012, no. 9, pp. 16–31. (In Russ.)
7. Tsegelnaya N. V. Application of modular-rating technology in mathematics lessons in college. Specificity of pedagogical education in regions of Russia, 2010, no. 1, pp. 80–81. (In Russ.)
8. Gromkova M. T. Pedagogical foundations of adult education. Moscow, K. Timiryazev Moscow Agr. Acad. Publ., 1993, 168 p. (In Russ.)
9. Tretyakov P. I., Sennovsky I. B. Modular learning technology at school. Moscow, New School, 1997, 324 p. (In Russ.)
10. Lavrentieva N. B. Pedagogical foundations for the development of modular teaching technology. Barnaul, AltGTU–AAEP, 1998, 252 p. (In Russ.)
11. Kubrushko P. F., Nazarov D. E. Modular training technology: tutorial. Moscow, V. Goryachkin MGAU Publ., 2001, 60 p. (In Russ.)
12. Choshanov M. A. Flexible technology of problem-modular learning: methodical manual. Moscow, Public education, 1996, 160 p. (In Russ.)
13. Gareev V. M., Kulikov S. I., Durko E. M. Principles of modular learning. Vestnik vysshei shkoly, 1987, no. 8, pp. 33–48. (In Russ.)
14. Lavrentiev G. V., Lavrentieva N. B. Components of modular learning technology: textbook. Barnaul, AltSU Publ., 1994, 128 p. (In Russ.)
15. Azimova N. S. Technologies of teaching higher mathematics to students of economic universities. Scholarly notes of Khujand State University named after Academician B. Gafurov. Series of humanities and social sciences, 2016, no. 1, pp. 176–180. (In Russ.)
16. Alexandrova E. V., Zubova I. I. Experience of using the modular-rating system for assessing the competencies of students in the classroom in the discipline “Mathematics” at Orel State Agrarian University. Scholarly notes of Orel State University. Series: Natural, technical and medical sciences, 2014, no. 6, pp. 13–16. (In Russ.)
17. Akimova I. V., Ermolaeva E. I. Organization of modular teaching of mathematics to students of a construction university using information educational resources. In the world of scientific discoveries, 2011, no. 8, pp. 83–95. (In Russ.)
18. Ermolaeva E. I. Systematization of mathematical knowledge among students of construction specialties in the framework of modular training. Science and school, 2008, no. 1, pp. 33–37. (In Russ.)
19. Medvedeva I. P., Mindeeva S. V., Bekirova R. S. Modular-rating technology of teaching mathematics in a technical university. Systems. Methods. Technologies, 2014, no. 2, pp. 146–151. (In Russ.)
20. Klingsted G. L. Developing Lehr modules for individualized instruction. Educational Technology, 1990, no. 11, pp. 73–84.
21. Russell J. D. Modular instruction: a guide to the design, selection, utilization and evaluation of modular materials. Minneapolis, Burgess Publ., 1974, 164 p.
22. Chiu M.-Sh. Approaches to the teaching of creative and non-creative mathematical problems text. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2009, no. 4, pр. 55–79.
23. Glaser R. Instructional technology and the measurement of learning outcomes: Some questions. American Psychologist, 1963, no. 18, pp. 519–521.
24. Mongush M. V. Modular-rating system of quality control of knowledge of first-year students of agricultural specialties of Tuva State University in studying the discipline “mathematics”. Bulletin of pedagogical innovations, 2007, no. 4, pp. 155–165. (In Russ.)
25. Titova E. I., Chaprasova A. V. Implementation of control of student knowledge and skills in mathematics in the conditions of modular training. Modern problems of science and education, 2015, no. 2-1, art. 461. (In Russ.)
Supplementary files
For citation: Koksharova M.V., Morozova S.V., Belchikova O.G. The use of modular-rating technology of teaching mathematics to students of Altai State Agricultural University. Professional education in the modern world. 2022;12(2):289-298. https://doi.org/10.20913/2618-7515-2022-2-12
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
