Social capital as a factor in the development of civic engagement of students
https://doi.org/10.20913/2618-7515-2022-2-7
Abstract
Introduction. In modern conditions of becoming of a civil society and the constitutional state the public attention is concentrated on modern youth whose civic activity affects how the tasks set for society and the state will be implemented.
Purpose setting. The future of Russia is largely determined by the values that are emerging today in the communities of schoolchildren and students. In this regard, the objective of forming conceptual representations about the processes of formation of civic engagement of young people becomes to be relevant. The purpose of this study is to analyze the social capital of the individual as a factor influencing the civic activity of young people studying both at school and at university, including those who are representatives of the Russian movement of schoolchildren. Methodology and methods of the study. The paper provides a theoretical systematic and meaningful analysis of such variables that form social capital as the value attitudes of young people, the level of trust in various agents of influence and the strength of communication with them.
Results. The conducted correlation analysis confirmed the hypothesis that exists a relationship between these variables and the object of study. It is shown that modern youth is largely focused on solving their own problems, focused on the "inner circle", is not inclined to trust people in general, lacks solidarity values, concentrating on individualistic interests, and this significantly hinders their inclusion in the manifestation of civic activity. The exception is the representatives of the Russian movement of schoolchildren, who have a high level of trust in the state, patriotic ideals and willingness to interact with public organizations, they are prone to civic responsibility and social activity.
Conclusion. It is necessary to create mechanisms for the inclusion of young people in various communities to solve socially significant issues, to strengthen the values of solidarity, as well as to form a unified value system in the youth environment, in which not only universal values, but also patriotism would occupy a significant place.
About the Author
M. V. ZharovaRussian Federation
Marina V. Zharova – Candidate of Physical and Mathematical Sciences, Associate Professor of the Department of Human Resources Management Education at Institute of Economics and Management
office 35, building 6, 48 Moika River Embankment, St. Petersburg, 191 186
References
1. Bourdieu P. Scholastic point of view. Cultural Anthropology, 1990, vol. 5, pp. 380–391. DOI: https:// doi.org/10.1525/can.1990.5.4.02a00030.
2. Coleman J. S., Hoffer T. B. Public and private schools: the impact of communities. New York, 1987, 254 p.
3. Fukuyama F. Trust: social virtues and the path to prosperity. Fukuyama. Moscow, AST, Keeper, 2006, 730 p. (In Russ.).
4. Lin N. Building a network theory of social capital. Connection, 1999, vol. 22, no. 1, рр. 28–51.
5. Moore S., Daniel M., Paquet S., Dube L., Govin L. Association of individual network social capital with abdominal obesity, overweight and obesity. Journal of Public Health, 2009, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 175–183. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdn104.
6. Araujo L. M., Easton G. Relational approach to social capital. Corporate social capital and responsibility. Dordrecht, 1999, рр. 68–87.
7. Leenders R. Th. A. J., Gabbay S. M., Fiegenbaum A. Corporate social capital and the strategic management paradigm: an unforeseen perspective on organizational performance. Research report of University of Groningen, SOM Research Institute. Groningen, 2001, pp. 1–38.
8. Nahapiet J., Ghoshal S. Social capital, intellectual capital and organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 1998, vol. 23, no. 2, рр. 242–266. DOI: 10.2307/259 373.
9. Penning J. M., Lee K. Social capital of the organization: conceptualization, level of analysis and impact on efficiency. Corporate social capital and liability. New York, 1998, рр. 43–67.
10. Dutton J. E., Ragins B. R. (eds.) Exploring positive relationships at work: building a theoretical and research foundation. London, Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc. Publ., 2007, 421 p.
11. Kajanoja J, Simpura J. (eds.) Social capital: global and local perspectives. Helsinki, Gov. Inst. For Econ. Research, 2000, 187 p.
12. Putnam R. D. Bowling alone: the collapse and restoration of the American community. New York, Simon & Schuster, 2000, 544 p.
13. Fukuyama F. Great gap. Moscow, AST, Ermak, 2004, 474 p. (In Russ.)
14. Fukuyama F. Trust: social virtues and the path to prosperity. Moscow, AST, Ermak, 2004, 730 p. (In Russ.)
15. Narayan D. Bonds and bridges: social capital and poverty. [S. l.], Poverty group, 1999, 52 p.
16. Putnam R.D. Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital. Journal of Democracy, 1995, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 67–78.
17. Macherinskene I., Minkute-Genrikson R. Simanavichene Zh. Social capital of the organization: research methodology. Sociological research, 2006, no. 3, рр. 29–39. (In Russ.)
18. Guzhavina T.A. Civic participation as an externality of poverty. Sociological science and social practice, 2019, no. 1, pp. 37–54. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.19181/snsp.2019.7.1.6268
19. Gendugova M. N. Social capital as a factor in the formation of youth citizenship. Sociology of power, 2011, no. 4, pp. 117–124. (In Russ.)
20. Khripkova D. V., Nachkebia M. S., Reutova M. N., Khripkov K.A. Value manifestations of social activity Scientific result. Sociology and management. Scientific result. Sociology and management, 202, vol. 6, no. 4, рр. 55–68. (In Russ.)
21. Reutov E. V. Social solidarity in attitudes and practices of the population. Power, 2016, no. 4, рр. 94–99. (In Russ.)
Supplementary files
For citation: Zharova M.V. Social capital as a factor in the development of civic engagement of students. Professional education in the modern world. 2022;12(2):240-252. https://doi.org/10.20913/2618-7515-2022-2-7
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.