Psychoanalysis of transformation and change of logos in the conditions of metamodern
https://doi.org/10.20913/2618-7515-2021-2-21
Abstract
About the Author
V. V. SobolnikovRussian Federation
Doctor of Psychology, Professor, Professor of the Department of General Psychology and History of Psychology, employee of the scientific laboratory “Archetypal and Addictive Psychology”, Professor of the Novosibirsk branch of the UNESCO Department at MGIMO (U), Vice-President of the Academy of Polar Medicine and Extreme Human Ecology
28, Vilyuiskaya st., Novosibirsk, 630126, Russian Federation
References
1. Van den Akker R., Gibbons A., Vermeulen T. Metamodernism: historicity, affect, and depth after postmodernism. London, Rowman & Littlefield Intern, 2017, 304 p.
2. Martin R. Thinking in the style of "I". What way do successful leaders think. Moscow, Yurayt, 2016. 228 p. (In Russ.)
3. Eve M. P. Thomas Pynchon, David Foster Wallace and the problems of "Metamodernism". C21 Literature: Journal of 21st Century Writings, 2012, no. 1, pp. 7–25.
4. Sobolnikov V. V. Problems of informationpsychological confrontation in the logic of psychology of metamodern. Professional education in the modern world, 2020, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 4347–4358. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.20913/2618-7515-2020-4-18.
5. Baudrillard J. Consumer society. Moscow, AST, 2020, 320 p. (In Russ.)
6. Timofeev A. A. Change of the political elite as a necessary factor of economic development. Communicology, 2016, vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 140–153. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.21453/2311-3065-2016-4-6-140-153.
7. Freinacht H. The reign of hackers, hipsters & hippies. Metamoderna, 2017. URL: http://metamoderna.org/the-reignof-hackers-hipsters-hippies?lang=en (accessed 02.02.2021).
8. Guseltseva M. S. Metamodernism in psychology: new methodological strategies and changes in subjectivity. Bulletin of Saint-Petersburg University. Psychology, 2018, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 327–340. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu16.2018.402.
9. Jung C., Samiels G. E., Odainik V., Hubbuck J. Analytical psychology: past and present. Moscow, Martis, 1997, 320 p. (In Russ.)
10. Durand G. Les Structures anthropologiques de I’imaginaire. Introduction à l’archétypologie générale. Paris, 2016, 560 p.
11. Durand G. Figures mythiques et visages de l’œuvre: de la mythocritique à la mythanalyse Ile verte. Paris, Dunod, 1992, 362 p.
12. Richard J. F. Mental activity. Understanding, reasoning, finding solutions]. Moscow, Inst. of Psychology RAS, 1998, 232 p. (In Russ.)
13. Dorst B., Vogel R. (eds.) Active imagination: the Jungian period. Khar’kov, Humanit. Center, 2016, 200 p. (In Russ.)
14. Dugin A. G. Logos and mythos. Sociology of depths. Moscow, Acad. project Triksta, 2010, 364 p. (In Russ.)
15. Lebedko V. E., Lebedko O. V. Outcast goddesses. Femininity and masculinity. Bulletin of Baltic Pedagogical Academy, 2010, no. 96, pp. 64–75. (In Russ.)
16. Durand G. L’anthropologie et les structures du complexe logie et les structures du complexe. Dans Societes, 2007, no. 4, pp. 7–13.
17. Hollis J. Mythologemes: the embodiment of the invisible world. Moscow, Class, 2010, 184 p. (In Russ.)
18. Jung K. G. The structure of the psyche and individuation process. Moscow, Science, 1996, 269 p. (In Russ.)
19. Jung K. G. Synchronicity. Moscow, Refl-book, 1997, 320 p. (In Russ.)
20. Kirby A. The death of postmodernism and beyond. Philosophy Now: Magazine of Ideas, 2006, no. 58. URL: https://philosophynow.org/issues/58/The_Death_of_Postmodernism_And_Beyond (accessed 01.2018).
21. Gachev G. National images of the world. Cosmopsycho-logos. Moscow, Acad. Project, 2015, 511 p. (In Russ.)
22. Gumilev L. N. Ethnogenesis and the biosphere of the Earth. Saint Petersburg, Crystall, 2001, 638 p. (In Russ.)
23. Averintsev S. S. Sophia-Logos: dictionary. Kiev, Spirit and Litera, 2006, 207 p. (In Russ.)
24. Kreyk A. I. Connectivity/destructiveness is the main emergent effect that determines the possibility of the existence of social formations. Psychology, Sociology and Pedagogy, 2013, no. 4. URL: http://psychology.snauka.ru/2013/04/2111 (accessed 25.02.2021). (In Russ.)
25. Durand G. L’imagination symbolique. Paris, PUF, 1964, 128 p.
Supplementary files
For citation: Sobolnikov V.V. Psychoanalysis of transformation and change of logos in the conditions of metamodern. Professional education in the modern world. 2021;11(2):211-220. https://doi.org/10.20913/2618-7515-2021-2-21
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.