Psychoanalysis of transformation and change of logos in the conditions of metamodern


https://doi.org/10.20913/2618-7515-2021-2-21

Full Text:




Abstract

The article is devoted to the actual problem of mental transformation in the psychoanalytic process of changing the logos in the metamodernism logic, which determined its novelty. The work objective is to  conceptualize the “logos” notion within frameworks of the metamodern  “psychology of depths”, to identify the process of its change at a fragmentary level in crisis conditions. To achieve the goal the author solves a number of tasks: (a) to clarify the conceptualization of the key “logos” notion in relation to research; (b) to reveal the peculiarities of manifesting logos in modern conditions by means of the imaginer as an actor of transformation and overcoming the crisis; (c) to designate the author’s paradigm model of changeability. The study methodological  base is the psychoanalytic approach and rich scientific heritage of  Gilbert Durand, whose 100th anniversary is celebrated on May 1, 2021 by the world scientific community. All over the world he is known as a sociologist, anthropologist, religious scholar and researcher of imagination forms and functions, the author of the deep sociology  concept, theory and research tool. Therefore, the study applies general  scientific and psychoanalytic methods of cognition, as well as an  interdisciplinary approach, which made it possible to use culturological  and hermeneutic analysis methods. At the same time, the author  adopts elements of the culturological and sociological base methodology  with borrowing of concepts and prospects to explain  socio-psychological phenomena (metamodern, logos, imaginer, etc.)  having a complex psychological nature. Based on the results of the  theoretical analysis, the article demonstrated a generalized characteristic of the logos within frameworks of its conceptualization in the depth psychology topic, revealing the concept psychological nature and meanings to a certain extent. The author proposes the paradigmatic model modification of the logos changeability on J. Durand’s construction basis, investigates the psychological process of its transformation. Based on the analysis results of the logos state in crisis conditions, the paper represents fragments of its varieties and change probabilistic mechanisms. An uncertain geopolitical future creates a background to press a two-story topic, where the problem of synchronism of its development vertical axis will become a specific feature of scientific research, which implies further research.

About the Author

V. V. Sobolnikov
Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University
Russian Federation

Doctor of Psychology, Professor, Professor of the Department of General Psychology and History of Psychology, employee of the scientific laboratory “Archetypal and Addictive Psychology”, Professor of the Novosibirsk branch of the UNESCO Department at MGIMO (U), Vice-President of the Academy of Polar Medicine and Extreme Human Ecology

28, Vilyuiskaya st., Novosibirsk, 630126, Russian Federation



References

1. Van den Akker R., Gibbons A., Vermeulen T. Metamodernism: historicity, affect, and depth after postmodernism. London, Rowman & Littlefield Intern, 2017, 304 p.

2. Martin R. Thinking in the style of "I". What way do successful leaders think. Moscow, Yurayt, 2016. 228 p. (In Russ.)

3. Eve M. P. Thomas Pynchon, David Foster Wallace and the problems of "Metamodernism". C21 Literature: Journal of 21st Century Writings, 2012, no. 1, pp. 7–25.

4. Sobolnikov V. V. Problems of informationpsychological confrontation in the logic of psychology of metamodern. Professional education in the modern world, 2020, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 4347–4358. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.20913/2618-7515-2020-4-18.

5. Baudrillard J. Consumer society. Moscow, AST, 2020, 320 p. (In Russ.)

6. Timofeev A. A. Change of the political elite as a necessary factor of economic development. Communicology, 2016, vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 140–153. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.21453/2311-3065-2016-4-6-140-153.

7. Freinacht H. The reign of hackers, hipsters & hippies. Metamoderna, 2017. URL: http://metamoderna.org/the-reignof-hackers-hipsters-hippies?lang=en (accessed 02.02.2021).

8. Guseltseva M. S. Metamodernism in psychology: new methodological strategies and changes in subjectivity. Bulletin of Saint-Petersburg University. Psychology, 2018, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 327–340. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.21638/11701/spbu16.2018.402.

9. Jung C., Samiels G. E., Odainik V., Hubbuck J. Analytical psychology: past and present. Moscow, Martis, 1997, 320 p. (In Russ.)

10. Durand G. Les Structures anthropologiques de I’imaginaire. Introduction à l’archétypologie générale. Paris, 2016, 560 p.

11. Durand G. Figures mythiques et visages de l’œuvre: de la mythocritique à la mythanalyse Ile verte. Paris, Dunod, 1992, 362 p.

12. Richard J. F. Mental activity. Understanding, reasoning, finding solutions]. Moscow, Inst. of Psychology RAS, 1998, 232 p. (In Russ.)

13. Dorst B., Vogel R. (eds.) Active imagination: the Jungian period. Khar’kov, Humanit. Center, 2016, 200 p. (In Russ.)

14. Dugin A. G. Logos and mythos. Sociology of depths. Moscow, Acad. project Triksta, 2010, 364 p. (In Russ.)

15. Lebedko V. E., Lebedko O. V. Outcast goddesses. Femininity and masculinity. Bulletin of Baltic Pedagogical Academy, 2010, no. 96, pp. 64–75. (In Russ.)

16. Durand G. L’anthropologie et les structures du complexe logie et les structures du complexe. Dans Societes, 2007, no. 4, pp. 7–13.

17. Hollis J. Mythologemes: the embodiment of the invisible world. Moscow, Class, 2010, 184 p. (In Russ.)

18. Jung K. G. The structure of the psyche and individuation process. Moscow, Science, 1996, 269 p. (In Russ.)

19. Jung K. G. Synchronicity. Moscow, Refl-book, 1997, 320 p. (In Russ.)

20. Kirby A. The death of postmodernism and beyond. Philosophy Now: Magazine of Ideas, 2006, no. 58. URL: https://philosophynow.org/issues/58/The_Death_of_Postmodernism_And_Beyond (accessed 01.2018).

21. Gachev G. National images of the world. Cosmopsycho-logos. Moscow, Acad. Project, 2015, 511 p. (In Russ.)

22. Gumilev L. N. Ethnogenesis and the biosphere of the Earth. Saint Petersburg, Crystall, 2001, 638 p. (In Russ.)

23. Averintsev S. S. Sophia-Logos: dictionary. Kiev, Spirit and Litera, 2006, 207 p. (In Russ.)

24. Kreyk A. I. Connectivity/destructiveness is the main emergent effect that determines the possibility of the existence of social formations. Psychology, Sociology and Pedagogy, 2013, no. 4. URL: http://psychology.snauka.ru/2013/04/2111 (accessed 25.02.2021). (In Russ.)

25. Durand G. L’imagination symbolique. Paris, PUF, 1964, 128 p.


Supplementary files

For citation: Sobolnikov V.V. Psychoanalysis of transformation and change of logos in the conditions of metamodern. Professional education in the modern world. 2021;11(2):211-220. https://doi.org/10.20913/2618-7515-2021-2-21

Views: 179

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2224-1841 (Print)