Main directions of psychological and pedagogical support of students with special needs and their families in the academic counseling context


https://doi.org/10.20913/2618-7515-2021-1-19

Full Text:




Abstract

The article is devoted to the problem of the activity directions of the academic psychological service related to schoolchildren and students with disabilities and their families, as well as other subjects and stakeholders of education. Psychological assistance is a necessary part of a successful (effective and productive) educational pro- cess for schoolchildren and students with disabilities and their families. Academic counseling as the main component of psychological assistance to students with disabilities and their families (as well as teachers and other subjects of education involved in the context of inclusive or integrative educational practices) is an important channel to prevent and overcome situational conflicts, personal and interpersonal problems, and development crises of students of secondary and high schools with disabilities and other subjects of the educational process at the individual, group and social levels. The paper objective is to study main areas of psychological and pedagogical support for students with disabilities and their families in the academic counseling context. The research methods are theoretical analysis of the problems of psychological and pedagogical support of students with disabilities and their families in the context of academic counseling. Study results. There are several difficult moments and factors impeded training and education as well as a student development as a person, partner and professional as a whole in the school and university educational environment. Problems of education, including in the context of assistance tasks to develop and form individuals, partners and professionals for people with disabilities and their families, their causes and consequences affect the subjects of education at many levels, and in many ways. Academic psychological counseling is an important component of psychological assistance to students with disabilities and their families, as well as teachers and other educational actors and stakeholders involved in the context of inclusive or integrative educational practices. It is an important channel to prevent and overcome both situational, local, and persistent, large-scale educational conflicts, personal and interpersonal problems, and development crises of students with disabilities and other subjects of the educational process at the individual, group and social levels. In academic counseling as psychological and pedagogical counseling of education subjects, the specialist should proceed from the understanding that education is not only a source and means of development of the individual and group, but it generates, actualizes (di)stresses and crises at the personal, interpersonal and organizational levels as well. The leading idea of counseling is the idea of development, but not compensation.

About the Authors

S. V. Gridneva
South Federal University
Russian Federation

Svetlana V. Gridneva – Candidate Psychological Sciences, Associate Professor, Department of General and Pedagogical Psychology, Academy of Psychology and Pedagogy

105/42, Bolshaya Sadovaya str., 344006, Rostov-on-Don



A. I. Tashcheva
South Federal University
Russian Federation

Anna I. Tashcheva – Candidate Psychological Sciences, Associate Professor, Department of Personality Psychology and Consultative Psychology, Head of Psychological Service, Academy of Psychology and Pedagogy

105/42, Bolshaya Sadovaya str., 344006, Rostov-on-Don



M. R. Arpentieva
K. E. Tsiolkovsky Kaluga State University
Russian Federation

Mariyam R. Arpentieva – Doctor of Psychological Sciences, Professor, Department of Developmental Psychology and Education

26, Razin str., 248023, Kaluga



References

1. Arpentieva M. R. Academic socio- psychological counseling and teaching of psychology. Kaluga, K. E. Tsiolkovsky KSU Publ., 2016, 670 p. (In Russ.).

2. Arpentieva M. R., Tashcheva A. I., Gridneva S. V. Commodification of education: processes and results. Professional Education in the Modern World, 2019, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 2406–2420.

3. Verbitsky A. A. Active education in higher education. Moscow, Higher school, 1991, 228 p. (In Russ.).

4. Medvedeva A. The issue of didactogenic neurosis. Scientific Notes of V. І. Vernadsky Taurida National University. Series: Philosophy. Culturology. Political sciences. Sociology, 2010, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 167–171. (In Russ.).

5. Minigalieva M. R. The study of psychology and self-knowledge of students. Psychotherapeutic model of pedagogical communication L. A. Petrovskaya. Saarbrucken, Lambert Acad. Publ., 2012, 632p. (In Russ.).

6. Sukhomlinsky A. V. I give my heart to children. Kiev, Radyansk school, 1973, 287 p. (In Russ.).

7. Ballantyne E., Muir A. In practice from the viewpoint of an occupational therapist. Disability on equal terms. London, 2008. P. 142–149.

8. Cameron C. Whose problem? Disability narratives and available identities. Community Development Journal, 2007, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 501–511.

9. Cameron C. Further towards an affirmation model. Disability studies: emerging insights and perspectives. Leeds, 2008. P. 14–30.

10. Darling R. B., Heckert D. A. Orientations toward disability: differences over the lifecourse. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 2010, vol. 57, no. 2, pp. 131–243.

11. Kielhofner G. Rethinking disability and what to do about it: disability studies and its implications for occupational therapy. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 2005, vol. 59, no. 5, pp. 487–496.

12. Challis S., Bedford J. Book Review: Masefield P. Strength: broadsides from disability on the arts, Trentham Books, 2006, 230 p. Community Development Journal, 2007, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 527–529. DOI: 10.1093/cdj/bsm043.

13. McCormack C., Collins B. Can disability studies contribute to client-centred occupational therapy practice? British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 2010, vol. 73, no. 7, pp. 339–342.

14. McKnight J. The careless society: community and its counterfeits. New York, Basic Books, 1995. 390 p.

15. Law M. A review of the evidence on the conceptual elements in forming client centred practice. Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 2006, vol. 73, no. 3, pp. 153–162.

16. Swain J., French S. Towards an affirmation model of disability. Disability and Society, 2000, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 569–580.

17. Adler A. Children parenting. Rostov-on-Don, Phoenix, 1998, 448 p. (In Russ.).

18. Vygotsky L. S. The fundamentals of defectology. Saint Petersburg, Doe, 2003, 654 p. (In Russ.).

19. Luria A. R. Restoration of brain functions after a military injury. Moscow, Medicine, 1948, 236 p. (In Russ.).

20. Korsakov N. K., Mikadze Yu. V. (comps.) The legacy of A. R. Luria in the modern scientific and cultural-historical context: on the 110th anniversary of A. R. Luria. Moscow, MSU, 2012, 328 p. (In Russ.).

21. Chomskaya E. D. Neuropsychology. Saint Petersburg, Peter, 2005, 496 p. (In Russ.).

22. Korotkina I. B. On “road maps”, the “ranking rush” and academic writing. Higher Education in Russia, 2017, no. 1, pp. 15–24. (In Russ.).

23. Angelovsky K. Teachers and innovations: book for teacher. Moscow, Prosveshchenie, 1991, 159 p. (In Russ.).

24. Arpentieva M. R., Kassymova G. K., Lavrinenko S. V., Tyumaseva Z. I., Valeeva G. V., Kenzhaliyev O. B., Triyono M. B., Duvalina O. N., Kosov A. V. Environmental education in the system of global and additional education. Bulletin of National Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Kazakhstan, 2019, vol. 3, pp. 11–18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32014/2019.2518-1467.45.

25. Kassymova G. К., Stepanova G. A., Stepanova O. P., Menshikov P. V., Arpentieva M. R., Merezhnikov A. P., Kunakovskaya L. A. Self-development management in educational globalization. International Journal of Education and Information Technologies, 2018, vol. 12, pp. 171–176.

26. Kassymova G. К., Tokar O. V., Tashcheva A. I., Slepukhina G. V., Gridneva S. V., Bazhenova N. G., Shpakovskaya E. Yu., Arpentieva M. R. Impact of stress on creative human resources and psychological counseling in crises. International Journal of Education and Information Technologies, 2019, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 26–32.

27. Kassymova K. G., Tyumaseva Z. I., Valeeva G. V., Lavrinenko S. V., Arpentieva M. R., Kenzhaliev B. K., Kosherbayeva A. N., Kosov A. V., Duvalina O. N. Integrative model of student and teacher stress coping: the correction of relations in educational, professional and personal interaction. Bulletin of National Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Kazakhstan, 2019, vol. 3, no. 379, pp. 2–11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32014/2019.2518-1467.53.

28. Vereshchagina A. V., Nechipurenko V. N., Samygin S. I. Value crisis of modern education in the historical projection and dynamics of modernization of its paradigmatic bases in the conditions of challenges of information age. Context and Reflection: Philosophy of Peace and Man, 2016, vol. 2, pp. 74–91. (In Russ.).

29. Clark B. R. Maintaining change at universities. The succession of case studies and concepts. Moscow, Higher School of Economics Publ., 2011, 312p. (In Russ.).

30. Afanasenko I. V., Tashcheva A. I., Gabdulina L. I. System of values of the youth in the light of its social frustration. Social Sciences, 2015, no. 10, pp. 1287–1290.

31. Gridneva S. V., Vasyakin B. S., Ovsyanik O. A., Pozharskay E. L., Berezhnaya M. S. Modern health improving psychotechnologies of a higher school teacher’s personality. Eurasian Journal of Analytical Chemistry, 2017, vol. 12, pp. 1–22.

32. Samygin S. I., Nechipurenko V. N. Philosophical and methodological foundations of higher school pedagogy. Context and Reflection: Philosophy of Peace and Man, 2015, no. 4/5, pp. 24–39. (In Russ.).

33. Schwab J. J. Brandwein P. P. The teaching of science. Cambridge, Harvard Univ. Press, 1962, 152 p.

34. Kassymova G. K., Arpentieva M. R., Kosherbayeva A. N., Triyono M. B., Sangilbayev S. O., Kenzhaliyev B. K. Science, education and cognitive competence based on e-learning. Bulletin of the National academy of sciences of the Republic of Kazakhstan, 2019, no. 1, pp. 269–278. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32014/2019.2518-1467.31.

35. Mezirov J. Fostering critical reflection in adulthood: a guide to transformative and emancipator learning. San Francisco, Oxford, 1991, 221 р.

36. Stepanova G. A., Tashcheva A. I., Stepanova O. P., Menshikov P. V., Kassymova G. К., Arpentieva M. R., Tokar O. V. The problem of management and implementation of innovative models of network interaction in inclusive education of persons with disabilities. International Journal of Education and Information Technologies, 2018, vol. 12, pp. 156–162.

37. Stepanova O. P., Gridneva S. V., Menshikov P. V., Kassymova G. К., Tokar O. V., Merezhnikov A. P., Arpentieva M. R. Value-motivational sphere and prospects of the deviant behavior. International Journal of Education and Information Technologies, 2018, vol. 12, pp. 142–148.


Supplementary files

For citation: Gridneva S.V., Tashcheva A.I., Arpentieva M.R. Main directions of psychological and pedagogical support of students with special needs and their families in the academic counseling context. Professional education in the modern world. 2021;11(1):226-235. https://doi.org/10.20913/2618-7515-2021-1-19

Views: 258

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2224-1841 (Print)