The agrarian education quality development through creating a multi-level longlife agricultural education system functioning in the agro-educational cluster conditions


https://doi.org/10.20913/2618-7515-2021-2-19

Full Text:




Abstract

The high significance of the production environment to form competencies and susceptibility to innovation prompted authors to develop a regional model of a multi-level lifelong agricultural education system with participating innovative enterprises of the agro-industrial complex. A special role in this integration process, ensuring the creation of an agro-educational cluster, is assigned creating stable horizontal links between agrarian educational organizations (agro-profile general education schools, agricultural colleges or technical schools, agricultural  universities, institutions for advanced personnel training  and retraining of the agro-industrial complex), which form a multi-level lifelong agricultural education system, and agricultural enterprises taking part in the development of innovative agricultural technologies and their implementation in agricultural standards. As while implementing horizontal ties, in contrast to vertical ones characterized by subordination, the coordination function prevails, so this allow avoiding the repetition of mistakes arisen when creating educational  and production complexes in the state farms-technical school form. Unfortunately, the advanced for that time idea to strengthen the  student practical training in a new professional and educational structure at its implementing process did not provide the expected results. The fact is that the presence of hierarchy and subordination in state farms-technical schools determined the educational goal dominance over production ones, which led to a gradual slowdown in the agricultural production development, and subsequently to its stagnation. As a result, the educational subsystems  of state farms-technical schools were isolated from innovative changes in the agricultural production sector and, therefore, could not provide the required quality of agricultural education. That’s why, maintaining an equal position of the organizations participating the  agro-educational cluster creation through the implementing horizontal  ties has become our hypothetical assumption about its permanent educational effectiveness. The article describes an experimental study  revealing the procedure to create a multi-level longlife agricultural education system functioning in the agro-educational cluster conditions based on horizontal links.

About the Authors

A. V. Gaag
Tomsk Agricultural Institute – Branch of Novosibirsk State Agrarian University
Russian Federation

Candidate of Economic Sciences, Associate Professor, Head of Department of Hunting and Zootechnics, Director

19, K. Marx Str., Tomsk, 634009, Russian Federation



A. A. Medensev
Tomsk Agricultural Institute – Branch of Novosibirsk State Agrarian University
Russian Federation

Candidate of Pedagogical Sciences, e-learning specialist

19, K. Marx Str., Tomsk, 634009, Russian Federation



References

1. Baydenko V. I. A competence approach to design educational standards for higher professional education (methodological and methodological issues): a manual. Moscow, 2009, 114 p. (In Russ.)

2. Toropov D. A. Ensuring the vocational education quality in Germany: dissertation. Moscow, 2005, 301 p. (In Russ.)

3. Faktorovich A. A. Theory and practice of the education quality management in a modern university. Rostov-on-Don: SFU, 2011, 200 p. (In Russ.)

4. Petukhova T. P. University and schools: an educational cluster. Higher education in Russia, 2010, no. 7, pp. 113–121. (In Russ.)

5. Mashchenko O. N. Social partnership as a social and pedagogical phenomenon. Pedagogical education and science, 2011, no. 1, pp. 47–50. (In Russ.)

6. Anokhin P. K. Fundamental issues of the general theory of functional systems. Moscow, Direct-Media, 2008, 131 p. (In Russ.)

7. Afanasyev V. G. Society: consistency, cognition, management. Moscow, Politizdat, 1981, 432 p. (In Russ.)

8. Blaunberg I. V., Mirsky E. M., Sadovsky V. N. System approach and system analysis. System research. Methodological problems: yearbook 1982. Moscow, 1982, pp. 34–69. (In Russ.)

9. Bondarevskaya E. V. Theory and practice of studentcentered education. Rostov-on- Don, Rostov Pedagogic. Univ. Publ., 2000, 351 p. (In Russ.)

10. Raven J. Competence in modern society. Identification, development and implementation. Moscow, Kogito-Center, 2002, 396 p. (In Russ.)

11. Ginetsinsky V. I. Knowledge as a category of pedagogy: the experience of pedagogical cognitology. Leningrad, Leningrad State Univ. Publ, 1989, 144 p. (In Russ.)

12. Verbitsky A. A. Methodological problems of lifelong education. New methods and teaching tools. Longlife education: methodology and practice. Moscow, 1990, pp. 3–30. (In Russ.)

13. Ingekamp K. Pedagogical diagnostics. Moscow, Pedagogy, 1991, 240 p. (In Russ.)

14. Skalkova Ya. Methodology and methods of pedagogical research. Moscow, Pedagogika, 1989, 219 p. (In Russ.)

15. Cherepanov V. S. Expert methods in pedagogy: a manual. Perm, PSPI Publ., 1988, 84 p. (In Russ.)

16. Olkhovsky D. V., Loskutov A. A. Pedagogical experiment: methodology to introduce and implement in educational activities. Modern problems of science and education, 2018, no. 6, art. 156. URL: http://www.science-education.ru/ru/article/view?id=28153 (accessed 14.01.2021). (In Russ.)

17. Bestuzhev-Lada I. V. Normative social forecasting: possible ways to achieve the goals of society. Systematization experience. Moscow, Nauka, 1987, 216 p. (In Russ.)

18. Serikov V. V. Education and a personality. Theory and practice of designing pedagogical systems. Moscow, Logos, 1999, 272 p. (In Russ.)

19. Ryagin S. N. Continuity of secondary general and higher vocational education in the context of their systemic changes: diss. abstr. Moscow, 2010, 21 p. (In Russ.)

20. Gimpelson V., Kapelyushnikov R., Roshchin S. (eds.) The Russian labor market: trends, institutions, structural changes: a report. Moscow, Center for Strategic Research of HSE, 2017, 145 p. (In Russ.)

21. Dudyrev F. F., Romanova O. A., Shabalin A. I., Abankina I. V. Young professionals for the new economy: secondary vocational education in Russia. Moscow, Higher School of Economics Publ., 2019, 271 p. (In Russ.)

22. Anisimov P. F. Regionalization of secondary vocational education (theory and practice). Moscow, Higher school, 2002, 268 p. (In Russ.)

23. Continuing education: problems of integration of secondary schools, vocational lyceums, colleges and universities: proc. of region. sci.-methodic. school-seminar. Samara, SamSTU, 1998, 217 p. (In Russ.)

24. Goncharenko T. V. The system of methodological support of longlife multilevel professional education: diss. abstr. Ekaterinburg, 1997, 22 p. (In Russ.)

25. Federal law «On education in the Russian Federation» on December 29, 2012 no. 273-FZ (amended on February 17, 2021). Electronic fund of legal and regulatory documents. URL: http://docs.cntd.ru/document/902389617 (accessed 14.03.2021). (In Russ.)

26. Order of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation on April 5, 2017, no. 301 «On approval of the procedure to organize and implement educational activities for educational programs of higher education - bachelor’s programs, specialist programs, master’s programs». Garant. URL: https://www.garant.ru/products/ipo/prime/doc/71621568/ (accessed 14.03.2021). (In Russ.)

27. Methodological recommendations for an expert to analyze the training content and quality of a direction (specialty) of a higher educational institution. Moscow, Research Center of Problems of Specialist Training Quality, 2003, 34 p. (In Russ.)

28. Miroshnichenko A. A. Theory and technology of constructing professionally oriented structures of educational elements: dissertation. Izhevsk, UdSU, 1999, 317 p. (In Russ.)

29. Kums G. F. The crisis of education in the modern world: a systems analysis. Moscow, Progress, 1970, 263 p. (In Russ.)

30. Anoshkina V. L., Rezvanov S. V. Education. Innovation. Future (methodological and sociocultural issues). Rostov-on-Don, RO IPK & PRO Publ., 2001, 176 p. (In Russ.)

31. Samorukov V. I. Development of the system of training, retraining and advanced training of personnel in the economy priority sectors in the context of Russia’s membership in WTO. Adult longlife education as a factor to improve the life quality: proc. of XIII Intern. sci.-pract. conf. Ser. «Pastukhov Readings–2015». Yaroslavl, 2015, pp. 1-7–113. (In Russ.)

32. Perevertailo A. S. Results of regionalization: network and cluster vectors to develop regional systems of vocational education. Federal reference book. Secondary vocational education in Russia. Moscow, 2015, vol. 1, pp. 219–221. (In Russ.)

33. Araslanova A. A. Quality management of higher professional education based on forming regional clusters. 2nd ed. Moscow, Berlin, Direct-Media, 2016, 461 p. (In Russ.)

34. Zimnyaya I. A. Key competencies as a new paradigm of educational outcomes. Higher education today, 2003, no. 5, pp. 34–42. (In Russ.)

35. Questionnaire to study the motivation for achieving success by T. Ehlers. School of modern technologies. URL: http://psy-resultat.ru/page200 (accessed 14.03.2021). (In Russ.)


Supplementary files

For citation: Gaag A.V., Medensev A.A. The agrarian education quality development through creating a multi-level longlife agricultural education system functioning in the agro-educational cluster conditions. Professional education in the modern world. 2021;11(2):187-200. https://doi.org/10.20913/2618-7515-2021-2-19

Views: 250

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2224-1841 (Print)