Applying the information and communication technologies in the educational process

G. A. Koloskova; R. Y. Koloskov; I. M. Lyamina

doi:10.20913/2618-7515-2021-2-6

Applying the information and communication technologies in the educational process

G. A. Koloskova, R. Y. Koloskov, I. M. Lyamina

https://doi.org/10.20913/2618-7515-2021-2-6

Full Text:

Abstract

The article is devoted to an urgent problem related to the active introduction of digital technologies in the educational process at the background of the current situation in the world due to the pandemic. The article objective is to identify the involvement of students in the educational process in a remote educational environment, as well as the transition of the educational process towards distant digital environment. Using the information and communication technologies is currently highly preferred in the field of education. New teaching methods are applied actively in the educational process, and especially in the field of digital transformation at all levels of education. Nowadays, the distance education is becoming a multi- faceted layer, which research is designed to meet the need and desire of applying in the education field. The research methodological basis is the current concepts of the digital educational environment, as well as the information society theory. Research methodology: the analysis of literature and contemporary views on introducing digital technologies in the educational process and the impact of information and communication technologies on involving students in the educational process. Students use various digital devices in their activities - mobile phones, tablets, computers and a large number of computer apps. Various school information systems are convenient for all participants in the educational process. The empirical research was carried on using techniques of questionnaire, discussion, interviews. The article focuses on understanding pedagogical situations and acquisition of experience by teachers in the pedagogical process using digital technologies. Students need to learn through digital learning support that these digital technologies are a great way to discover and create new things. The paper discusses main models of using ICT in the educational process. It taken into account their properties and instructions for use in addition to varieties.

Keywords

digital educational environment, distance learning, digital transformation of education,

About the Authors

G. A. Koloskova

Russian State Agrarian University – Moscow Timiryazev Agricultural Academy
Russian Federation

Master’s Degree Student

49, Timiryazev Str., Moscow, 127550, Russian Federation

R. Y. Koloskov

State University of management
Russian Federation

Master’s Degree Student

99, Ryazan Ave., 109542, Moscow, 109542, Russian Federation

I. M. Lyamina

Russian State Agrarian University – Moscow Timiryazev Agricultural Academy
Russian Federation

Senior Lecturer, Department of Foreign and Russian Languages

49, Timiryazev Str., Moscow, 127550, Russian Federation

References

1. Bell D. The coming of post-industrial society: a venture of social forecasting. Moscow, Academia, 1999, 386 p. (In Russ.).

2. Gotskaya I. B. Mass open online courses: implementation experience, problems and prospects. Modern education: traditions and innovations, 2015, no. 4, pp. 96–100. (In Russ.).

3. Angelova O. Yu., Podolskaya T. O. Trends in the market of distance education in Russia. Concept, 2016, no. 2, pp. 26–30. URL: http://e-koncept.ru/2016/16026.htm (accessed 27.08.20). (In Russ.).

4. Kostyuk Yu. L., Levin I. S., Fuks A. L., Fuks I. L., Yankovskaya A. E. Mass open online courses – a modern concept in education and training. Bulletin of Tomsk State University, 2014, no. 1, pp. 89–97. (In Russ.).

5. Owens J., De St. Croix T. Engines of social mobility? Navigating the discourse of meritocratic education in an unequal society. British Journal of Educational Research, 2020, vol. 68, no. 4, pp. 1–21. DOI: 10.1080/00071005.2019.1 708863.

6. Jin J., Ball S. J. Meritocracy, social mobility and a new form of class domination // British Journal of the Sociology of Education, 2020, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 64–79. DOI: 10.1080/01 425 692.2019.1 665 496.

7. Koutsouris G., Anglin-Jaffe H., Stentiford L. How well do we understand social inclusion in education? British Journal of Educational Research, 2020, vol. 68, no. 2, pp. 179–196. DOI: 10.1080/00071005.2019.1658861.

8. Fedulina S. B. Innovative processes in education related to the development of information and communication technologies. URL: http://www.rusnauka.com/17_APSN_2013/Pedagogica/4_141554.doc.htm (accessed 27.08.20). (In Russ.).

9. Tsygankova V. N. Digitalization of the educational process (a case of mass online courses). Creative Economy, 2019, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 523–532. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.18334/ce.13.3.39958.

10. Tulchinsky G.L. Digital transformation of education: challenges to higher school. Philosophical Sciences, 2017, no. 6, pp. 121–136. (In Russ.).

11. Gladyshev A. A., Gladysheva A. A. The philosophy of contemporary education: fundamental nature or competence of the digital space. Professional education in the modern world, 2020, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 3508–3519. (In Russ.). DOI: https:// doi.org/10.15 372/PEMW20 200 114.

12. Mikidenko N.L., Storozheva S.P. Digital educational space: problems and practices of application of information educational resources. Professional education in the modern world, 2020, vol. 10, no. 1, p. 3418–3427. (In Russ.). DOI: https://doi.org/10.15372/PEMW20200104.

13. Vlaskin A. V. The problem of loss of meaning and its impact on modern information communications. Modern philosophy in Russia: interdisciplinary studies in the context of traditions and innovations: Fourth Siber. philosoph. seminar (Omsk, Oct. 15–17, 2014). Omsk, 2014, pp. 162–165. (In Russ.).

14. Kudashov V. I., Chernykh S. I., Yatsenko M. P., Rakhinsky D. V. Influence of information technology on the formation of the moral foundations of globalization education. Professional education in the modern world, 2016, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 583–592. (In Russ.).

15. Trashkova S.M. Information technologies in education: theoretical and legal aspects. Modern educational technologies in the world educational space, 2016, no. 3, pp. 47–51. (In Russ.).

16. Trashkova S.M., Rakhinsky D.V. Educational policy and the quality of education. Modern education in the context of reform: innovations and prospects: a proc. of the III All-Russ. sci- pract. conf. Krasnoyarsk, 2012, pp. 254–258. (In Russ.).

17. Shekhovtsev A. Yu. Information paradigm in the structure of modern thinking. Saratov, Saratov State Univ., 1998, 176 p. (In Russ.).

18. Yakovleva I. V. Safety of the Russian educational space: axiological content of the concept. Professional education in the modern world, 2019, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 2443–2450. (In Russ.).

19. Musat R. P., Mineev V. V., Neskryabina O. F., Panasenko G. V., Maksimov S. V., Rakhinsky D. V. The artistic worldview in the context of sociocultural realia. Amazonia Investiga, 2019, vol. 8, no. 23, pp. 350–357.

20. Arpentieva M. R., Tashcheva A. I., Gridneva S. V. Commodification of education: processes and results. Professional education in the modern world, 2019, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 2406–2420. (In Russ.).

21. Kudashov V. I., Chernykh S. I., Yatsenko M. P., Grigoreva L. I., Pfanenshtil I. A., Rakhinsky D. V. Historical reflection in the educational process: an axiological approach. Analele Universitatii din Craiova. Seria Istorie, 2017, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 139–147.

22. Kuhn L. Complexity and educational research: a critical reflection. Complexity theory and philosophy of education. Chichester, Wiley Blackwell, 2008. P. 169–180.

23. Morrison K. Complexity theory and education. Asia Pacific Education Research Association annual conference (November 28–30, 2006). Hong Kong, 2006. P. 1–12.

24. Nicolescu B. Methodology of transdisciplinarity – levels of reality, logic of the included middle and complexity. Transdisciplinary Journal of Engineering & Science, 2010, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 19–38.

25. Vega V., Robb M. B. The common sense census: inside the 21st-century classroom. San Francisco, Common Sense Media, 2019. URL: https://www.commonsensemedia.org/research/thecommonsense-census-inside-the-21stcentury-classroom-2019 (accessed 05.09.2019).

26. Segal A.P. «Digit» and «Digital Society» as simulacra of XXI century (about terminological rigor in the description of communication processes). Professional education in the modern world, 2019, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 2898–2908 (In Russ.)

27. Morin E. Education in future: seven urgent tasks. Synergetic paradigm. Synergetic of education. Moscow, 2007, pp. 24–96. (In Russ.).

28. Netesov S. V. Forming a new type of professional is the task of an innovative society. Innovative person and innovative society. Novgorod, 2012, pp. 298–308. (In Russ.).

29. Chernykh S. I., Parshikov V. I. Education as a reality and virtuality. Philosophy of education, 2010, no. 1, pp. 50–55. (In Russ.).

Supplementary files

For citation: Koloskova G.A., Koloskov R.Y., Lyamina I.M. Applying the information and communication technologies in the educational process. Professional education in the modern world. 2021;11(2):52-60. https://doi.org/10.20913/2618-7515-2021-2-6

Refbacks

There are currently no refbacks.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

ISSN 2224-1841 (Print)

Username
Password