Digital educational environment in the pandemia context: the student audience intentions


https://doi.org/10.15372/PEMW20200314

Full Text:




Abstract

The research problematics relates to the general crisis of the higher education paradigm, disintegration of external factors and the internal ideal prototype of the education highly organized structure. The article objective is to identify the student audience’s consciousness intentions in the field of self-realization, education and career objectified during the pandemia due to the radical functional turn of the education sphere towards the remote digital environment. The new conditions determine the processes of crystallization of explicit and implicit needs, trends and problems in many areas of public activity, and especially in the field of digitalization of higher education. The social and personal consciousness intentionality becomes nowadays a multi-faceted layer, which research aims to materialize the needs and aspirations of new generations in the self-realization sphere. The research methodological basis is the current concepts of the digital society and digital educational environment, as well as the information society theory. The study methodology is surveying full-time students of bachelor’s and master’s programs during distance learning. According to objective to identify the student intentions, which external and hidden meanings are emphasized and objectified at this period, the surveying tasks are the following: 1) determining the effectiveness level of distance learning from the view point of the subject of educational process (student audience); 2) identifying the essential and related problems of online learning; 3) revealing the needs, expectations and aspirations of young people in the self-realization, continuing and international education, career sphere. The study results show that half of the students are dissatisfied with the distance learning format. Problems are associated with rising the volume of independent work, deficit of user competencies, lack of methodological support and orientation in incoming information flow growth, psycho-emotional overloads due to an unusual lifestyle and training, and decrease in motivation to learn. Along with this, first-and second-year students demonstrate a desire for education in general; interest in learning additional knowledge and skills, international contacts in the training process; readiness for self-realization and obtaining a new socio-cultural experience.

About the Authors

L. S. Nabokova
Siberian Federal University
Russian Federation

Larisa S. Nabokova – candidate of philosophy sciences, associate professor, Department of Advertising and Socio-Cultural Activities

79 Svobodny Ave., Krasnoyarsk, 660 041



Yu. S. Rogacheva
Siberian Federal University
Russian Federation

Julia S. Rogacheva – Student, Department of Advertising and Socio-Cultural Activities

79 Svobodny Ave., Krasnoyarsk, 660041



References

1. Chernykh S.I. Education as fictitious capital. Professional’noe obrazovanie v sovremennom mire= Professional education in the Modern World, 2020, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 3400–3408. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15372/PEMW20200102. (In Russ.)

2. Polyankina S.Y. Online-education: reontologisation or deontologisation? Professional’noe obrazovanie v sovremennom mire = Professional education in the Modern World, 2020, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 3428–3437. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15 372/PEMW20200105. (In Russ.)

3. Owens J., De St. Croix T. Engines of social mobility? Navigating the discourse of meritocratic education in an unequal society. British Journal of Educational Research, 2020, DOI: 10.1080/00071005.2019.1708 863 (forthcoming)..

4. Jin J., Ball S.J. Meritocracy, social mobility and a new form of class domination. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 2020, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 64–79. DOI: 10.1080/01 425692.2019.1665496.

5. Koutsouris G, Anglin-Jaffe H., Stentiford L. How well do we understand social inclusion in education? British Journal of Educational Research, 2020, vol. 68, no. 2, pp. 179–196. DOI: 10.1080/ 0071005.2019.1658861.

6. Semenova T.V., Vilkova K.A. Types MOOC integration into universities’ educational process. Universitetskoe upravlenie: praktika i analiz = University Management: Practice and Analysis, 2017, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 114–126. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15 826/umpa.2017.06.080.

7. Gotskaya I.B. Mass open online courses: implementation experience, problems and prospects. Sovremennoe obrazovanie: traditsii i innovatsii = Modern Education: Traditions and Innovations, 2015, no. 4, pp. 96–100.

8. Karakozov S.D., Manyakhina V.G. Mass open online courses in foreign and Russian education. Vestnik Rossiiskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya «Informatizatsiya obrazovaniya» = Bulletin of Russian University of Peoples Friendship. Series. Informatization of education, 2014, no. 3, pp. 24–31.

9. Angelova O.Yu., Podolskaya T.O. Trends in the market of distance education in Russia. Kontsept = Concept, 2016, no. 2, pp. 26–30. URL: http://e-koncept.ru/ 2016/16026.htm (accessed 27.08.20).

10. Kostyuk, Yu. L., Levin I.S., Fuks A.L., Fuks I.L., Yankovskaya A.E. Mass open online courses – a modern concept in education and training. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta = Bulletin of Tomsk State University, 2014, no. 1, pp. 89–97.

11. Fedulina S.B. Innovative processes in education related to the development of information and communication technologies. URL: http://www.rusnauka. com/17_APSN_2013/Pedagogica/4_141554.doc.htm (accessed 27.08.20).

12. Tsygankova V.N. Digitalization of the educational process (a case of mass online courses). Kreativnaya ekonomika = Creative Economy, 2019, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 523–532. DOI: https://doi: 10.18334/ce.13.3.39958.

13. Tulchinsky G.L. Digital transformation of education: challenges to higher school. Filosofskie nauki = Philosophical Sciences, 2017, no. 6, pp. 121–136.

14. Gladyshev A.A., Gladysheva A.A. The philosophy of contemporary education: fundamental nature or competence of the digital space. Professional’noe obrazovanie v sovremennom mire = Professional Education in the Modern World, 2020, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 3508–3519. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15 372/PEMW20 200 114.

15. Mikidenko N.L., Storozheva S.P. Digital educational space: problems and practices of application of information educational resources. Professional’noe obrazovanie v sovremennom mire = Professional Education in the Modern World, 2020, vol. 10, no. 1, p. 3418–3427. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15372/PEMW20200104.

16. Peters M.A. The crisis of international education. Educational Philosophy and Theory. DOI: 10.1080/00131 857.2019.1 663410 (forthcoming).

17. Castels M.; Shkaratan O.I. (ed.) «Information age: economy, society and culture. Moscow, HSE, 2000, 608 p.

18. Toffler E. The third wave. Moscow, AST, 1999, 784 p.

19. Toffler E.; Gurevich P.S. (ed.) Future shock. Moscow, AST, 2003, 557 p.

20. Bell D. The coming of post-industrial society: a venture of social forecasting. Moscow, Academia, 1999, 386 p.


Supplementary files

For citation: Nabokova L.S., Rogacheva Y.S. Digital educational environment in the pandemia context: the student audience intentions. Professional education in the modern world. 2020;10(3):4041-4052. https://doi.org/10.15372/PEMW20200314

Views: 653

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2224-1841 (Print)