Practical philosophy of teaching argumentation and critical thinking


https://doi.org/10.15372/PEMW20200307

Full Text:




Abstract

The article considers the teaching experience of course «Critical Argumentation and Design-Thinking» at St. Petersburg National Research University of Information Technology, Mechanic and Optic (ITMO) in 2018–2020, and the ways to solve theoretical, methodical, and methodological problems during its development and realization. The course mission is the practical implementation of a new trend in philosophy – the philosophy of critical thinking, which the authors develop related to texts and speeches. The central issue of the article is the description of the teaching approaches and content of practical classes aimed to master the critical and creative argumentation skills in three aspects: identification, analysis and evaluation. The authors show how to solve educational, methodological, didactic and administrative tasks, which are to combine reactive and analytical competencies of critical thinking with projective and creative competences, or design-thinking, in a course; to choose one textbook suitable both English and Russian tracks of the course, and to compile a corpus of tasks and exercises to control the lecture content of the course; to subordinate the content of lectures and practical exercises to the tasks of mastering the competencies established by federal standards according to curricula academic tasks prescribed by the university administration. The article presents the course structure; practical class plans accompanied by a detailed description of their performance; details of using specialized software, and plans to prepare educational debates, and to create a bank of examination tests. It gives recommendations on organizing the students» work in small groups during lectures and practical classes implementing the principles of active peer-to-peer learning, and on organizing educational debates and exams.

About the Authors

G. V. Karpov
St. Petersburg State University
Russian Federation

Gleb V. Karpov – candidate of philosophical sciences, assistant of the Department of Logic

5 Mendeleevskaya Line, St.‑Petersburg, 199 034



E. N. Lisanyuk
St. Petersburg State University
Russian Federation

Elena N. Lisanyuk – doctor of philosophical sciences, professor of the Department

5 Mendeleevskaya Line, St.‑Petersburg, 199 034



References

1. Lisanyuk E.N., Perova N.V. Steve Fuller and his game of knowledge in the context of post-truth. Bulletin of Tomsk State University Philosophy. Sociology. Political science, 2020, no. 53, pp. 221–257. DOI: 10.17 223 / 1998 863X / 53/24.

2. Chernykh S.I. Parshikov V.I. Education as a service: social and philosophical analysis. Professional Education in the Modern World, 2015, no. 2, pp. 40–47.

3. Temple C. The development of critical thinking through reading and writing in the higher education system: strategies for use in any subject areas: RCMCHP project. New York, Open Society Inst., 2002, 46 p.

4. Philosophy: A school of freedom. Teaching philosophy and learning to philosophize. Paris, UNESCO Publ., 2007, 279 p.

5. Joe Y., Lau F. An introduction to critical thinking and creativity: think more, think better. Hoboken, Wiley, 2011, 262 p.

6. Kahneman D. Thinking, fast and slow. Moscow, AST, 2017, 653 p.

7. Maidanov A.S. Methodology of scientific creativity. Moscow, LKI, 2008, 512 p.

8. Borovinskaya D.N. Creative thinking: the main directions of research. Bulletin of Tomsk State University. Philosophy. Sociology. Political science, 2017, no. 40, pp. 22–31.

9. Lisanyuk E.N., Migunov A.I. Argumentation in the competition of modern research approaches. RFBR Bulletin, 2018, no. 1, pp. 77–87. DOI: 10.22204 / 2587‑8956‑2018‑090‑01‑77‑87.

10. Barbashina E.V. The need for critical thinking in the education transformation conditions. Professional Education in the Modern World, 2018, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 1777–1787. DOI: 10.15 372 / PEMW20 180 205.

11. Walton D. Fundamentals of Critical Argumentation. Cambridge, Cambridge Univ. Press, 2006, 360 p.

12. Online visualisation of argument. Version 2.1. URL: http://ova.arg-tech.org/ (accessed 20.05.2020).

13. Rationale online mapping. URL: https://www.rationaleonline.com/ (accessed 20.05.2020).

14. AGORA-net argument mapping. URL: https://agora-info.spp.gatech.edu/ (accessed 20.05.2020).

15. an Eemeren F.H., Grootendorst R., Henkemans F.S. Argumentation: analysis, verification, representation. Saint Petersburg, 2002, 154 p.

16. Lisanyuk E.N. Rules and fallacies of argumentation. Logic: a textbook. Moscow, Prospect, 2017, pp. 588–658.

17. Miloslavova A. S, Novolodskaya T.A. (eds.) The bases of logical culture. Saint Petersburg, ITMO, 2011, 131 p.

18. Mazur E. Peer instruction: a user’s manual. New Jersey, 1997, 257 p.

19. Stepacheva-Bohenek I. (ed.) Speeches that changed the world. Moscow, Mann, Ivanov and Ferber, 2016, 256 p.

20. Rybold G. Speaking, listening and understanding. Debate for non-native-english speakers. New York, 2006, 180 p.


Supplementary files

For citation: Karpov G.V., Lisanyuk E.N. Practical philosophy of teaching argumentation and critical thinking. Professional education in the modern world. 2020;10(3):3959-3970. https://doi.org/10.15372/PEMW20200307

Views: 475

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2224-1841 (Print)