Semantic core of security of subjects in the conditions of information pressure

V. G. Tylets; T. M. Krasnianskaya; V. V. Iokhvidov

doi:10.15372/PEMW20200305

Semantic core of security of subjects in the conditions of information pressure

V. G. Tylets, T. M. Krasnianskaya, V. V. Iokhvidov

https://doi.org/10.15372/PEMW20200305

Full Text:

Abstract

The article presents the results of studying the security meanings in subjects under extreme conditions of significant negative information amounts affected them. The relevance of addressing the problem is due to the determinism of security subjective meanings, the context of their production, and insufficient study of this circumstance in works of predecessors. The work objective is to study the semantic core of security of subjects suffering information pressure. The following tasks are solved: identifying the security meanings of subjects under information pressure; establishing their semantic core of the security category; building a hierarchy of security meanings for the declared subjects. The research is taken a sample of 100 students studying in a number of metropolitan and regional universities. The main method is an associative experiment, which considers «security», «everyday security», and «acquired security» categories as incentives. The expert evaluation method was used as an auxiliary one to process empirical data. According to the study results, most of the significant elements (entering the center and near periphery of an associative field) have a stereotypical nature – 59.1 %, situational-conditioned nature – 31.8 %, value nature – 9.1 %. The semantic core of the security of respondents under information pressure is formed of universal values, probabilistically added by components of a stereotypical nature. Situational and stereotypical elements are attached to the semantic core of security. The scientific novelty consists is in studying the security meanings of respondents, who are in a situation of information pressure. Empirical confirmation of obtaining the security meaning by a variable part due to the conditions of finding the subject of their producing is significant. The further research prospect is seen in comparing of the security semantic core of actors that are in extreme and everyday conditions of life, as well as the expansion of the types of extreme situations to explore the conceptual core of security.

Keywords

security, threat, incentive, associative field,

About the Authors

V. G. Tylets

Moscow State Linguistic University
Russian Federation

Valery G. Tylets – doctor of psychological sciences, professor, professor of the Department of Psychology and Pedagogical Anthropology

38 (bld.1), Ostozhenka Str., Moscow, 119 034

T. M. Krasnianskaya

Moscow University for the Humanities
Russian Federation

Tatyana M. Krasnianskaya – doctor of psychological sciences, professor, professor of the Department of Social and Ethnic Psychology

5 Yunost» Str., Moscow, 111395

V. V. Iokhvidov

Stavropol State Pedagogical Institute
Russian Federation

Vladimir V. Iokhvidov – candidate of pedagogical sciences, associate professor of the Department of Pedagogy and Psychology,

7 Dolina Roz Str., Essentuki, 357 635

References

1. Doneva O.V. The experience in studying social responsibility of students in a situation of personal security risk. Higher Education Today, 2019, no. 2, pp. 48–50.

2. Krasnyanskaya T.M., Tylets V.G. Changing the person psychological security in the conditions of subject intrusion. Bulletin of the Baranavichy State University. Series. Pedagogical sciences, Psychological sciences, Philological sciences (literary criticism), 2017, no. 5, pp. 60–65.

3. Kutovoi I.N., Sadovnikova D.S. Personality as a category of the psychological security concept. Applied Psychology and Psychoanalysis, 2016, no. 4ю URL: https://ppip.idnk.ru/index.php/vypusk-1-2017/40‑2011‑02‑24‑12‑27‑14/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=811&catid=40 (accessed 10.06.2020).

4. Neal A., Griffin M.A. A study of the lagged relationships among safety climate, safety motivation, and accidents at the individual and group levels. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2006, vol. 91, no. 4, pp. 946–953.

5. Ivanov M.S., Solodukhin A.V., Pomeshkina S.A., Sery A.V., Yanitsky M.S., Gorbunova E.V. Perceptions of personal security threat in patients with a cardiological profile. Personality in extreme conditions and crisis situations of life activity, 2019, no. 8, pp. 78–84.

6. Krasnyanskaya T.M., Tylets V.G., Iokhvidov V.V. The concept of personal security as a psychological and criminological factor of self-defense. All-Russian Criminological Journal, 2018, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 826–835. DOI: 10.17 150/2500–4255.2018.12 (6).826–835.

7. Tylets V.G., Krasnyanskaya T.M. Subject security markers at different levels of information war reflection. Bulletin of Moscow State Regional University, 2018, no. 4, pp. 189–199. DOI: 10.18 384/2224‑0209‑2018‑4‑929.

8. Maralov V.G., Kudaka M.A., Markovich V.A., Kulanina S.V. The interconnection of social intelligence and the attitude of people to dangers. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutics, 2018, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 314–322.

9. Guldenmund F.W. The use of questionnaires in safety culture research – an evaluation. Safety Science. 2007, no. 45, pp. 723–743.

10. Mantorova I.V., Lyutova A.S. Problems of suggestion and suggestibility in the context of the concept of psychological security of the individual. Applied Psychology and Psychoanalysis, 2016, no. 4. URL: https://ppip.idnk.ru/index.php/vypusk-1-2017/40‑2011‑02‑24‑12‑27‑14/nomer-4-2016/807‑mantorova-i-v-lyutova-a-s-g-pyatigorsk#linkc (accessed 10.06.2020).

11. Kharlamenkova N.E., Tarabrina N.V., Bykhovees Yu.V., Vorona O.A., Kazymova N.N., Dymova E.N., Shatalova N.E. Psychological security of the individual: implicit and explicit concepts. Moscow, IP RAN Publ., 2017, 262 p.

12. Sudarik A.N. Research opportunities for psychological security and personal security in the field of high technologies. The relevance of the pedagogical heritage of A. S. Makarenko in modern conditions. Moscow, 2019, pp. 604–611.

13. Ivanov M.S. Security as a semantic base of patriotism. Professional education in Russia and abroad, 2019, no 1, pp. 142–148. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/1076–8998.5.3.347.

14. Griffin M.A., Neal A. Perceptions of safety at work: a framework for linking safety climate to safety performance, knowledge, and motivation. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 2000, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 347–358. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037.

15. Krasnyanskaya T.M., Tylets V.G. Resources of individual psychological security with respect to the employment status of a pensioner. Advances in Gerontology, 2018, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 256–261. DOI: 10.1134/S2 079 057 018 030116.

16. Tylets V.G., Krasnyanskaya T.M. Psycholinguistic research of the concepts «danger» and «security» in the language consciousness of students. Questions of Psycholinguistics, 2020, no. 1, pp. 84–97.

17. Basanova T.A. The concept of security in subjects with different characteristics of the semantic structure of the worldview. Bulletin of Taganrog State Radio Engineering University, 2005, no. 5, pp. 263–265.

18. Lozovaya G.V. Model of formation of productive ideas about life safety in students of pedagogical College. Education Sciences and Psychology, 2015, no. 3, pp. 42–52.

19. Sinel’nikova O.P. An empirical study of the views of senior pupils about safety of life activity. Russian Psychological Journal, 2009, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 122–125.

20. Smirnova O.V. Perceptions of safety in youth: gender and gender aspects. Woman in Russian Society, 2020, no. 1, pp. 85–100.

21. Pirmagomedova E.A. An empirical study of teenagers’ perception of the safety of life. Russian Psychological Journal, 2011, no. 1, pp. 140–144. (In Russ)

22. Krasnyanskaya T.M., Tylets V.G. Psychological resources for personal security with various experiences of extreme situations. Biomedical and Socio-Psychological Problems of Security in Emergency Situations, 2015, no. 2, pp. 100–107.

23. Mantorova I.V., Djevathanova D.A. Features of safety values of students with different type of time perspective. European Journal of Psychological Studies, 2016, vol. 7, Is. 1, pp. 22–28. DOI: 10.13 187/ejps.2016.7.22.

24. Sternin I.A., Rudakova A.V. Psycholinguistic meaning and its description. Theoretical problem. Saarbrücken, Lambert Acad. Publ, 2011, 192 p.

Supplementary files

For citation: Tylets V.G., Krasnianskaya T.M., Iokhvidov V.V. Semantic core of security of subjects in the conditions of information pressure. Professional education in the modern world. 2020;10(3):3938-3947. https://doi.org/10.15372/PEMW20200305

Refbacks

There are currently no refbacks.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

ISSN 2224-1841 (Print)

Username
Password