Social and psychological problems of the score-rating system for evaluating the work of employees in educational institutions


https://doi.org/10.15372/PEMW20200124

Full Text:




Abstract

Digital security in the modern world is one of the leading practical and theoretical trends. Many practitioners and theorists are working to improve digital security, usually completely ignoring the costs of this process, which is very necessary, but not as univocal as it is presented to the state and transnational corporations (TNCs) sponsoring the research. The purpose of the study is to analyze the socio-psychological aspects of the use of information and communication technologies (ICT) in managing university and school education. Research methodology and techniques. The paper presents the theoretical analysis of the problem of the socio-psychological dangers of using ICT in managing higher education and school education; it also summarizes the included and non-included observations over the processes and results of the implementation of the point-rating system and the use of ICT in university education. The results of the study. The systems «Virtual school» and «Virtual university», developed and implemented in order to optimize managing processes and increase the accessibility of education in schools and universities, face serious socio-psychological, managerial and legal problems. One of the main problems is the problem of sporadic or systemic violation of personal and organizational security. This problem arose not only because there is no culture of relationships in the digital environment. It arose because moral, conventional- ritual and legal normsб both in the real and in the «virtual» world, ceased to be real regulators of relations. The real regulators in this environment are the norms of the community that modifies all aspects of its existence. Teachers, administrations, the state face a really complicated challenge, which is to restore Russian education as the best education in the world, restore it as a sphere of culture, not business, re-orientate education to develop individual and culture, and not serve even the best «direct»needs of production and economics. However, morally meaningful and based on moral standards, participatory, developing educational technologies are not the unattainable future, but a developed tradition, which researchers and teachers are ready to support and restore.

About the Author

M. R. Arpentieva
K.E. Tsiolkovskiy Kaluga State University
Russian Federation

Mariam R. Arpentieva – doctor psychology science, Associate Professor, Professor of the Department of Developmental Psychology and Education 

26, Razin str., Kaluga, 248 023



References

1. Bettelheim B. Tutorial on survival in a concentration camp. In: Chernyavskaya A.G. (comp.). Psychology of domination and subordination: A reader. Minsk, Harvest Publ., 1998, pp. 157–281. (In Russ.)

2. Bespapova Yu.M. Ethical problems of higher education reform in Russia. Pedagogika = Pedagogy, 2016, no. 9, pp. 72–77. (In Russ.)

3. Barrows M. The Future is Declassified. What will be the world in 2030. Moscow, Mann, Ivanov and Ferber Publ., 2015, pp. 37–41. (In Russ.)

4. Yampolsky M. In the country of the victorious ressentiment. Available at: http://www.colta.ru/articles/specials/4887 (accessed 18.03.2019). (In Russ.)

5. Yashina G. Ratings-international scam. Why the Minister of Education is trying to reduce the number of «advanced»universities. Available at: http://kapital-ras.ru/articles/article/reitingi_mejdunarodnaya_ afera_zachem_ministr_obrazovaniya_pytaetsya_sokrat (accessed 08.03.2019) (In Russ.)

6. Lyubarets A.V. Neocons – a breakthrough to the creation of a global electronic concentration camp. Scientific search in the modern world. Collection of materials of the XVI International Scientific Practical Conference (Makhachkala, September 30, 2017) Makhachkala, Testing Limited Liability Company Publ., 2017, pp. 32–33. (In Russ.)

7. Kovacic L. Electronic concentration camp in Chinese. Genocide – no! Available at: http://genocid.net/kit-electronic-concentrationcamp-build-up-tows/ (accessed 10.11.2018) (In Russ.)

8. Aoun J.E. Robot-Proof: Higher Education in the Age of Artificial Intelligence. New York, London, MIT Press Publ., 2017, 216 p.

9. Bentham I. Introduction to the foundations of morality and legislation. Moscow, ROSSPEN Publ., 1998, 415 p. (In Russ.)

10. Orwell J. «1984» and essays from different years. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1989, 384 p. (In Russ.)

11. Foucault M. Surveiller et punir: Naissance de la prison. Paris, Gallimard Publ., 1975, 328 p.

12. Frankl V. To say life «Yes!»: A psychologist in a concentration camp. Moscow, Alpina Publ., 2011, 400 p. (In Russ.)

13. Bettelheim B. The Informed Heart: Autonomy in a Mass Age. Glencoe, Ill: Penguin Books, 1991, 320 р.

14. Kostenko I.P. The problem of the quality of mathematical education in the light of historical retrospectives. Moscow, Rostov State University of Communications (in Krasnodar) Publ., 2013, 501 p. (In Russ.)

15. Arpentieva M.R. (ed). Foresight Education: Values, Models and Technologies of Didactic Communication of the XXI Century. Canada, Toronto, Altaspera Publishing & Literary Agency Inc. Publ., 2018, 560 p.

16. Arpentieva M.R. (ed). Psychology and pedagogy of the future: youth foresight.Youth and psychology: ideas and projects. Canada, Toronto, Altaspera Publishing & Literary Agency Inc. Publ., 2018, 340 p.

17. Kassymova G.К., Stepanova G.A., Stepanova O.P., Menshikov P.V., Arpentieva M.R., Merezhnikov A.P., Kunakovskaya L.A. Self-development management in educational globalization. International Journal of Education and Information, 2018, no. 12, pp. 171–176.

18. Stepanova G.A., Tashcheva A.I., Stepanova O.P., Kassymova G.К., Tokar O.V., Menshikov P.V., Arpentieva M.R. The problem of management and implementation of innovative models of network interaction in inclusive education of persons with disabilities. International Journal of Education and Information, 2018, no. 12, pp. 156–162.

19. Stepanova G.A., Tashcheva A.I., Markova T.A., Shpakovskaya E.U., Arpentieva M.R., Bazhenova N.G., Tokar O.V., Kirichkova M.E. Value-notional relations of people with persons with disabilities in additional and alternative education and in other inclusive social practices. International Journal of Education and Information, 2019, no. 1, pp. 65–72.


Supplementary files

For citation: Arpentieva M.R. Social and psychological problems of the score-rating system for evaluating the work of employees in educational institutions. Professional education in the modern world. 2020;10(1):3611-3619. https://doi.org/10.15372/PEMW20200124

Views: 271

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2224-1841 (Print)