.png)
.png)
Email this article 
Inversion and converted forms of educational activities
https://doi.org/10.15372/PEMW20190407
Abstract
The article considers and compares two cognitive constructs – «converted forms»and «inverse relations» – in relation to educational activity. Inversions are understood as a form of relations in hierarchical systems, in which the lowest hierarchical element acquires a dominant value, while remaining at the same time in the same subordinate position. Previously converted forms were treated as a result of some accomplished transformation. In this study, the converted forms are presented as a result of inversion. There are many examples where the relationship between the concepts of «transformed forms»and «inversions»can be demonstrated. In a converted form it is possible to recognize, as a rule, the initial form existing before the transformation. Of particular importance are transformed forms in education. Thus, in many cases, there are transformed forms of educational activity, both on the part of students and teachers. For example, cramming becomes the converted form of educational activity on the part of students. It appears as a result of inversion, when the results of pedagogical control are put first in academic activity. With this inversion, the learning process is sacrificed to control. Training is not for future professional activities, but for the exam. Educational activity gets transformed in the case when emotions caused by the learning process, but not achieving the goal, come to the fore in the student»s activity The result is academic procrastination. Here educational activity (or any other purposeful activity) also acquires its converted form, namely pastime. Finally, the transformed form of educational activity is generated by the inversion of goals on the part of controlling authorities. As a result, the activity of the teacher is not to prepare students, but to meet the requirements for the accreditation of educational institutions.
About the Author
D. A. SevostyanovRussian Federation
Dmitry A. Sevostyanov – candidate of medical sciences, associate Professor, associate Professor of the Department of Personnel Policy and Personnel Management
630039, Novosibirsk, Dobrolyubov Street, house160
References
1. Sevostyanov D. A. Contradiction and Inversion. Novosibirsk, Novosibirsk State Agrarian University, Golden Ear Publ., 2015, 245 p. (In Rus)
2. Van der Meer J. M. Order. Available at: http://www.encyclopedia.com/topic/Order.aspx
3. Aksenovskaya L. N., Bazarov T. Yu. Management of Organizational Culture. Rossijskij psihologicheskij zhurnal = Russian Psychological Journal, 2008, no. 2, pp. 9–17. (In Rus)
4. Lévi-Strauss K. Primitive Thinking. Moscow, TERRA–Book club, Respublika Publ., 1999, 392 p. (In Rus)
5. Saaty T. Decision-Making. Method of Analysis of Hierarchies. Moscow, Radio and communication Publ., 1993, 316 p. (In Rus)
6. Marks K., Engels F. Compositions. Vol. 26, Part III. Moscow, Publishing House of Political Literature, 1964, pp. 471–568. (In Rus)
7. Mamardashvili M. K. Converted Forms (On the Necessity of Irrational Expressions). Moscow, Progress Publ., 1992, pp. 269–282. (In Rus)
8. Lungstein M. S. Transformed Forms in Political Economy: Methodological Issues. Available at: http://marklangstein.narod.ru/LaTransf.doc (In Rus)
9. Batishchev G. S. Contradiction as a Category of Dialectical Logic. Moscow, Higher School Publ., 1963, 120 p. (In Russian)
10. Bart R. Introduction to structural analysis of narrative texts. Zarubezhnaya ehstetika i teoriya literatury XIX-XX vv.: traktaty, stat’i, ehsse = Foreign Aesthetics and Theory of Literature of XIX-XX Centuries: Treatises, Articles, Essays, Moscow, Moscow state University Publ., 1987, pp. 387–422. (In Rus)
11. Leach E. Culture and communication: the Logic of the relationship of symbols. On the use of structural analysis in social anthropology. Moscow, Eastern literature of the Russian Academy of Sciences Publ., 2001, 142 p. (In Rus)
12. Wittgenstein L. Philosophical Writings. Part I. Moscow, Gnozio Publ., 1994. 521 p. (In Rus)
13. Rorty R. M., ed. The Linguistic turn: essays in philosophical method. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1992, 407 p. (In English)
14. Zavershneva E. Yu. A Transformed Form in the Theory of Archetypes by C. G. Jung. Available at: http://www.voppsy.ru/journals_all/issues/1999/996/996070.htm (In Rus)
15. Solomko Z. V. Social State as a Transformed Form. Rossiya: put’ k social’nomu gosudarstvu. Materialy Vserossijskoj nauchnoj konferencii (Moskva, 6 iyunya 2008 g.) = Russia: the path to a social state. Proceedings of the all-Russian scientific conference (Moscow, June 6, 2008), Moscow, Scientific Expert Publ., 2008, pp. 329–339. (In Rus)
16. Sevostyanov D. A. Inversive Analysis in the Management. Novosibirsk, Novosibirsk State Agrarian University, Golden Ear Publ., 2016, 287 p. (In Russian)
17. Chernykh S. I., Parshikov V. I. «Paralysis caused by analysis» or knowledgeable education. Profes-sional’noe obrazovanie v sovremennom mire = Professional education in the modern world, 2018, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 2148–2159. (In Rus)
18. Bogdan N. N., Bushueva I. P. Formation of professional development competencies in the preparation of bachelors of state and municipal administration. Vysshee obrazovanie segodnya = Higher education today, 2013, no. 11, pp. 14–21. (In Rus)
19. Sevostyanov D. A. Bezrodnaya G. V., Chel’cov M. V. Pedagogical control: inversion of goals and means. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher education in Russia, 2012, no. 1, pp. 31–37. (In Rus)
20. Gurina R. V. Management experiments with the contents of education and pedagogical science: the cart before the horse. Professional’noe obrazovanie v sovremennom mire = Professional education in the modern world, 2018, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1610–1617. (In Rus)
21. Glasser W. Schools without Failure. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1991, 184 p. (In Rus)
22. Barabanshchikova V. V., Marusanova G. I. Perspectives for Research of the Procrastination Phenomenon in Professional Work. Nacional’nyj psihologicheskij zhurnal = National Psychological Journal, 2015, no. 4 (20), pp. 130–140. (In Rus)
23. Bendicho P. F. et al. Effect on Academic Procrastination after Introducing Augmented Reality. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 2017, no. 13 (2), pp. 319–330.
24. Steel P. The Nature of Procrastination: A Meta-Analytic and Theoretical Review of Quintessential Self-Regulatory Failure. Psychological Bulletin, 2007, vol. 133, no. 1, pp. 65–94.
Supplementary files
For citation: Sevostyanov D.A. Inversion and converted forms of educational activities. Professional education in the modern world. 2019;9(4):3195-3204. https://doi.org/10.15372/PEMW20190407
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
