.png)
.png)
Email this article 
A power problem in the system of domestic humanitarian education
https://doi.org/10.15372/PEMW20190206
Abstract
This article analyzes the features of the study of the phenomenon of power in the global world. The author focuses on how the authorities dealt with mechanisms in the system of higher education. The article shows that in conditions of transformation of traditional political systems there is a need for adequate perception of specific management tools. Understanding of the specific power structures in the system of humanitarian education emerges as a necessary condition of comprehension of the functioning of the system of power in Russia. The author argues a thesis on the necessity of differentiate between institutional and functional features of the authorities at the level of the textbook. To understand adequately address these objectives, the author turns to the historical roots of formation of Russian statehood, where there was identity of our societies. This task, according to the authors of the article comes to the fore amid increasingly manifested in the modern world trends towards homogenization and cultural identity. That’s why you receive the urgent need to bring to the attention of the younger generation to explain features of the cultural identity of each individual society. The need for a socio-philosophical studies the problems of power derived from an existing set of contradictions that reflect the actually occurring social processes. In addition becomes increasingly apparent need to develop innovative research program the phenomena. The problem is compounded by the fact that globalization has become the leading direction of social development of the world community and the object of study of several Sciences: Economics, politics and ecology. The accumulation of theoretical studies on the essence of power within individual Sciences requires an analysis of the phenomenon with a more general, social and philosophical positions. The implementation of such plants has a scientific meaning, if they are constantly compared with the really existing and intensively developing phenomenon of regionalization. Philosophical analysis of such rapidly developing directions of power mechanisms will fully reveal the essence of contemporary social trends in the educational system.
About the Author
O. E. PuchkovRussian Federation
Oleg E. Puchkov – graduate student, Department of globalization and geopolitics
660 041, Krasnoyarsk, prospect Svobodnyj, House 82a, building 24, Room 3–52,
References
1. Jonah L. G. [Mass and power today (the relevance of E. Canetti)]. Voprosy filosofii, 2007, no. 3, pp. 3–14. (in Russ.)
2. Fedotov V. G. Good society. Moscow, 2005, 544 p. (in Russ.)
3. Frolov I. T. [Socio-ethical problems of modern science and humanistic]. Man-science-humanism: the 80-th anniversary of academician I. Frolov (from Ed. A.a. Huseynov). Institute of philosophy of the Russian Academy of Sciences. Science, 2009, pp. 205–224. (in Russ.)
4. Rohrmoser G. The crisis of liberalism. Moscow, 1996. 298 p. (in Russ.)
5. Churinov N. M. About the crisis of liberalism. Theory and history, 2005, no. 2, pp. 161–169. (in Russ.)
6. Rozin V. M. [Methodological experience of building the course, serving as navigator for programs and courses history and philosophy of science]. Philosophical Sciences, 2005, no. 11, pp. 96–118. (in Russ.)
7. Panfilova T. V. [Problem sense of History]. Voprosy filosofii, 2006, no. 12, pp. 11–23. (in Russ.)
8. Ilyin I.A. [On the resistance to evil by the power]. North, 1990, no. 4, pp. 140–149. (in Russ.)
9. Inozemtsev V. l. [Immigration: new issue of the Millennium. Methodological aspects]. Sociological researches, 2003, no. 6, pp. 29–38. (in Russ.)
10. Shipilov A. V. [The fate of democracy in the era of globalization]. Philosophical Sciences, 2005, no. 11, pp. 21–33. (in Russ.)
11. Tikhomirov L. F. Church Council, sole power and working the issue. Moscow, 2003, 624 p. (in Russ.)
12. Tikhomirov L.A. Monarchist statehood. Moscow, 2006, 624 p. (in Russ.)
13. Sagatovsky V. N. Antropokosmizm fhilosophy in summary. S.-Petersburg, 2004, 232 p.
14. Yatsenko M. P., Сherny D. S. [Study of information management in the context of globalization]. Professional education in the modern world, 2015, no. 4 (19), pp. 42–52. (in Russ.)
15. Rakhimov T.A., Galmagova G. M. [Implementing humanitarian component of educational standards]. Professional education in the modern world, 2017, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 1234–1237. (in Russ.)
16. Korolkov A.A. Spiritual meaning of Russian culture. S.-Petersburg, 2006, 739 p. (in Russ.)
17. Canetti E. People of our century. Art journalism. Moscow, 1990, 474 p. (in Russ.)
18. Trubetskoy E. N. Two beast. Meaning of life. Moscow, 1994, 432 p. (in Russ.)
19. Dahl R. On democracy. Moscow, 2000, 208 p. (in Russ.)
20. Spicy in the meaning of American federalism. What is a self-governing society. Moscow, 1993, 320 p. (in Russ.)
21. Krasin Y.A. [Metamorphosis of democracy in a changing world]. Polis, 2006, no. 4, pp. 127–138. (in Russ.)
22. Aron R. Peace and war between Nations. Moscow, 2000, 879 p. (in Russ.)
23. Cantor V. K. Between tyranny and freedom. To the question about the Russian mentality. The Russian political encyclopedia (ROSSPEN), 2007, 272 p. (in Russ.)
24. Novgorodzev P. I. On Ideally the public. Available at: http://www.philosophy.ru/library/vehi/ideal.html (accessed December 20, 2018). (in Russ.)
25. Kaldor M. New and old war: organized violence in the global era. Moscow, 2015, 416 p. (in Russ.)
Supplementary files
For citation: Puchkov O.E. A power problem in the system of domestic humanitarian education. Professional education in the modern world. 2019;9(2):2693-2701. https://doi.org/10.15372/PEMW20190206
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
