.png)
.png)
Email this article 
ANALYSIS OF SPECIFIC FEATURES BELONGED TO REGIONALISM IN THE STRATEGIES OF ETACENTRISM AND GLOBOCENTRISM IN SOCIAL HUMANITARIAN KNOWLEDGE AND EDUCATION
https://doi.org/10.15372/PEMW20190109
Abstract
Introduction. In the XXI century, society experiences the processes of globalization seen as objective and subjective ones. The first background is based on the general achievements of natural and technical and technological sciences. The second background is determined by the vectors of the most active social interests and forces, according to which different global concepts, strategies of social transformations are developed, priorities for development of socio-humanitarian knowledge and types of socio-humanitarian education are changed. The article identifies the main global strategies of leading social actors, on which the objectives of socio-humanitarian knowledge and education depend. Methodology and research method are seen as follows:. system-structural, structural-functional and prognostic approaches. Methods of analysis, comparison, analogy and integration of results in relation to science and education of the XXI century. Results. The objective processes of globalization as a whole are universal, determined by the general level of global communications on the basis of the achieved scientific and technological progress. Subjectively defined globalization, on the contrary, is differentiated depending on the basic interests of global social forces. The latter develop global strategies for the formation and change of the sociosphere, dictate priority directions of knowledge and education. Identification of modern global social strategies is necessary for understanding sociospheric transitional processes, for determining the current and future states of socio-humanitarian knowledge, education, and life prospects of people on the planet. The author singled out and proposed for discussion two leading modern sociospheric strategies: ethos and centristism. Since their implementation should be carried out in different areas of the planet, in regions of the planet, regionalism as an educational and cognitive direction becomes important in the study of these strategies. Accordingly, regionalism is also differentiated into essentially different directions: state regionalism and global regionalism (transregionalism). However, in regional knowledge and education, these forms of regionalism often mix, do not differ, which leads to a misunderstanding of the main perspectives and results of regionalism in different sociospheric strategies. Conclusion. Differential, comparative and prognostic approaches are needed to study the strategies of etacentrism and globocentrism, different forms of regionalism – state and global, analysis of the results of different forms of regional knowledge and identify the fundamental differences of socio-humanitarian education in the noted strategies and forms of regionalism
About the Author
K. A. KuzmenkoRussian Federation
Konstantin A. Kuzmenko – competitor
References
1. Panarin V.I., Parshikov V.I., Chernykh S.I. [Humanitarian culture as a condition for the transformation of education]. Professionalnoe obrazovanie v sovremennom mire = Professional education in the modern world, 2016, Vol.6, no. 1, pp. 34–40 (in Russ).
2. Parshikov V.I., Nalivaiko N.V., Meyer B. O. [Trends in development of national education (in the aspect of contemporary global problems)]. Professionalnoe obrazovanie v sovremennom mire = Professional education in the modern world, 2012, no. 2 (5). pp.3–9 (in Russ).
3. Chumakov, A. N. [Internet as an innovative form of education in the context of globalization]. Professionalnoe obrazovanie v sovremennom mire = Professional education in the modern world, 2016, Vol.6, no. 3, pp. 398–408 (in Russ).
4. Ursul, A. D. [Global studies and globalization studies: the formation of new integrative areas]. Filosofskaya mysl = Philosophical Thought, 2018, no. 4. pp.17–29 (in Russ).
5. Fursov A.I. [The global problem is the unconsciousness of what is happening]. Available at: https://postila.ru/post/62533985 (accessed September 22, 2018).
6. Kissinger G. [How does the Enlightenment end?]. Rossiya i globalnaya politika = Russia in global politics, 2018, no. 4 Available at: https://globalaffairs.ru/numbers/1577; Attali J. [On the threshold of the third millennium]. Moscow, International Relations Publ., 1993, 135 p.
7. Brzezinski, Z. The Great Chess Board (The Reign of America and its Geostrategic Imperatives). Moscow, International Relations Publ., 1998, 428 p.
8. Toffler E. [Metamorphosis of power. Knowledge, wealth and power on the threshold of the XXI century]. Moscow, AST Press, 2002, 583 p.
9. Maltsev V.A. [Political thought of the second half of the twentieth century]. Perm, Zvezda Publ., 1999. 586 p.
10. Kazarinova D. [The crisis of liberalism in the assessments of its adherents]. Rossiya v globalnoy politike = Russia in global politics, 2018, no. 6. Available at: https://globalaffairs.ru/number/Krizis-liberalizma-votcenkakh-ego-adeptov-19848 (accessed September 22, 2018).
11. Lilla, M. The Once and Future Liberal: After Identity Politics. London, Hurst & Co, 2018. 160 p.
12. Deudney D., Ikenberry G.J. Liberal World. The Resilient Order. Foreign Affairs, 2018, Vol. 97, no. 4, pp. 16–24.
13. Luce E. The Retreat of Western Liberalism. New York, Atlantic Monthly Press, 2017, 234 p.
14. Deneen P.J. Why Liberalism Failed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2018, 248 p.
15. [Outlines of the Future in the Context of World Cultural Development: XVIII International Likhachov Scientific Readings (05.2018)]. St. Petersburg, SPbSUP Press, 2018. 628 p.
16. P.D. Watson [Brzezinski: The New World Order is in danger because of the «resistance of the broad masses of the population»]. Available at: https://3rm.info/publications/30720-zbignev-bzhezinskiy-soprotivlenie-masssbivaet-dvizhenie-k-novomu-mirovomu-poryadku-s-kursa.html (accessed September 22, 2018).
17. Piven P.V., Sapelkin V.S., Tarasova E.I., Ushakova E.V. [Possible strategies of humanity: noospheres, conflict spheres, necrospheres]. [Proceedings of Internat.sci.conf «Nauka i obrazovanie»]. Belgorod, 2014, Vol. 3 Philosophy Music and life, pp. 12–20.
18. Pfanenshtil I.A. [Geopolitical aspects of globalization in the context of the civilizational prospects of mankind]. Professionalnoe obrazovanie v sovremennom mire = Professional education in the modern world, 2016, Vol.6, no. 1, pp. 40–47 (in Russ).
19. Maneshin V.S., Rachkov P.A. [The problem of law in the social sciences]. Moscow, MSU Press, 1989. 172 p.
20. Khalev V.V., Parshikov V.I., Ushakova E.V. [Transitivity in a system of socio-natural existence: a philosophical-methodological analysis]. Novosibirsk, SB RAS Press, 2014, 232 p.
21. Zinoviev A.A. [Factor of understanding]. Moscow, Algorithm Publ., Eksmo Press, 2006, 528 p.
22. Vyazantsev V.E. [Integrative approaches to the construction of modern concepts of social development. Cand. Philosoph. sci.thesis].Barnaul, AltSU Press, 2006, 178 p.
23. Diakov A.V., Sokolov A.M. [State Sovereignty in the Space of Philosophical Reflection: Civilizational Strategies and Biopolitics]. Voprosy filosofii = Questions of Philosophy, 2018, no. 11, pp. 25‒34 (in Russ).
24. Ivanov A.V., Fotieva I.V., Shishin M.Iu. [Spiritual and Ecological Civilization: Foundations and Prospects]. Barnaul, ASAU Press, 2010, 133 p.
25. Pfanenshtil I.A., Iatsenko M.P. [Actual problems of globalism and geopolitics]. Krasnoyarsk, SFU Press, 2012, 318 p.
26. Almond G., Powell J., Strom K., Dalton R. Comparative Political Science today. World overview. Moscow, Aspect Press, 2002, 537 p.
27. Maltsev V.A. [Political thought of the second half of the twentieth century]. Perm, Zvezda Publ., 1999, 586 p.
28. Abramkina S.R. [Polarization of Regions of a Federal State under the Conditions of the Openness of the National Economy. Cand. econ sci.thesis]. Chelyabinsk, 2010. 27 p.
29. Timofeev I.Iu. [Development of methods for assessing the role of regions in the formation of human potential]. Belgorod, BelSAU Press, 2015. 160 p.
30. Efremova K.A. [From regionalism to transregionalism: a theoretical comprehension of new reality]. Sravnitelnaya politika = Comparative policy, 2017, no. 8 (2), pp. 58–72 (in Russ).
31. Ruishuan, Zhu. [Features of the Chinese picture of the world]. Voprosy psikholingvistiki = Questions of psycholinguistics, 2015, no. 12 (23), pp. 233–237 (in Russ.)
32. Ekonomi E. [The Imperial Leader of China. Xi Jinping strengthens its power]. Rossiya v globalnoy politike = Russia in global politics, 2015, no. 1. Available at: https://globalaffairs.ru/number/Imperskiilider-Kitaya-17317 (accessed September 22, 2018).
33. Antonov, D. V. [Study of the categorical apparatus of the regional economy]. TERRA ECONOMICUS, 2010, Vol. 8, no. 3. Part 2, pp. 181–186 (in Russ).
34. Mezhevich N. M. [Concept «region» in modern scientific discourse]. Pskovskiy regionologicheskiy zhurnal = Pskov Regional Journal, 2006, no. 2, pp. 3–22 (in Russ).
35. Prokhorenko I.L. [New Regionalism and the Transformation of the International Order]. Puti k miru i bezopasnosti = Ways to Peace and Security, 2015, no. 2, pp. 20–28 (in Russ).
Supplementary files
For citation: Kuzmenko K.A. ANALYSIS OF SPECIFIC FEATURES BELONGED TO REGIONALISM IN THE STRATEGIES OF ETACENTRISM AND GLOBOCENTRISM IN SOCIAL HUMANITARIAN KNOWLEDGE AND EDUCATION. Professional education in the modern world. 2019;9(1):2464-2475. https://doi.org/10.15372/PEMW20190109
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
