THE PROBLEM OF THE INDIVIDUAL STABILITY OF THE OPERATOR TO INFORMATION STRESS UNDER RISK CONDITIONS


https://doi.org/10.15372/PEMW20180224

Full Text:




Abstract

The article deals with the problem of individual psychic stability of representatives of one of the professions (operator) of high-tech content to information-risk variables in psychologically difficult situations. The scientific interest lies in a more in-depth study of the most significant properties in the system of personal qualities of the operator that provide an adaptation to the stressors in the labor process. The methodological basis of the study was the provisions of the system-complex approach, the system-regulative concept, the cognitive approach to the study of stress and cognitive-affective personality theory. The results of the analysis of theoretical approaches to the stressiveness of the employees of high-tech occupations were the basis for carrying out an experimental study. Along with general scientific methods, a set of techniques was used, including an individual typological questionnaire, L. N. Sobchik; a questionnaire of the dominant mental state of LVKulikov; a questionnaire of strong-willed self-control, developed by AG Zverkov and BV Eidman, which made it possible to assess the stress-resistance of the surveyed contingent. 62 operators were surveyed in the work, carrying out professional activities at various strategic sites deployed in the Siberian subregion. The results of the study of the mental state of operators under conditions of information impact are presented. A group of respondents is singled out probabilistically exposed to information-risk variables. The results of the study showed that 6% of respondents were experiencing general anxiety, 12% – aggression, 15% – depression and 9% are in a state of intrapsychological conflict. At the same time, from 3% to 6% of respondents showed a low level of activity and performance. In general, a low level of satisfaction with life showed about 21% of respondents. The assumption of the specificity of the influence of information stress under the conditions of risk has been confirmed. A group of respondents is identified probabilistically exposed to the impact of information stress. It is concluded that it is necessary not only to systematically monitor the state of stress resistance of operators, but also to increase the individual stability of the operator with the help of psychological techniques and training. Further study of the psychological nature of stress resistance, the mechanisms of its manifestation, the dependence on the specifics of the activity and the impact on the labor process will make it possible to substantiate the prospective directions of research.

About the Authors

V. V. Sobolnikov
Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University.
Russian Federation

Valery V. Sobolnikov – Doctor of Psychological Sc., Professor at the Chair of General Psychology and History of Psychology. Full Member of the International Academy of Pedagogical Education, Vice-President of the Academy of Polar Medicine and Extreme Human Ecology.

28 Vilyuyskaya Str., 630126 Novosibirsk.



V. V. Irgit
Новосибирский государственный педагогический университет.
Russian Federation

Victoria V. Irgit – PhD-student at the Chair of General Psychology and History of Psychology. 

28 Vilyuyskaya Str., 630126 Novosibirsk.



References

1. Mischel W., Shoda Y. [A cognitive-affective system of theory of personality]. Psychological Review, 1995, vol. 102, no. 2, p. 246–268.

2. Sobolnikov V. V. [Psychology of activity in special and extreme conditions: problems of personality development]. Novosibirsk: NSPU Publ., 187 p. (In Russian)

3. Maynard D. C., Hakel M. D. [Effects of Objective and Subjective Task Complexity on Performance]. Human Perfomance, 1997, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 303–330.

4. Kroak J. [Psychological encyclopedia]. St. Petersburg: Piter Publ., 2003, 869 p.

5. Selye G. [Stress without distress]. Riga: Vieda Publ., 1992, 286 p.

6. Kobasa S. C. [Personality and Resistance to illness]. American Journal of Community Psychology. 1979, vol. 7, pp. 413–423.

7. Martenuick R. G. [Differential effects of shock arousal on motor performance]. Perception and Motor Skills, 1969, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 443–447.

8. Parsons P. A. [Advances in the Study of Behavior]. Behavior Genetics, 1998, vol. 18, pp. 155–180.

9. Lazarus R. S., Launier R. [Stress – Related Transactions between Person and Environment]. Ed. L. A. Pervin, M. Lewis. Perspectives in Interventional Psychology. New York: Pervin/Plenum, 1978, pp. 287–327.

10. Rizvi N. H. [A critique of the models to the study of stress]. Journal of Social Science and Human, 1985, vol. 1–2, pp. 103–123.

11. Leonova A. B. [Psychology of professional activity]. Psychological journal, 2004, no. 2, pp. 69–78. (In Russian)

12. Lazarus R. S. [Progress on a cognitive motivational-relational theory of emotion]. American Psychologist, 1991, vol. 46, pp. 819–837.

13. Sapov I. A., Novikov V. S. [Nonspecific mechanisms of human adaptation]. Leningrad: Nauka Publ., 1984, 146 p. (In Russian)

14. Endler N. S., Parker J. D.A. [Multidimensional assessment of coping: the Acritical evaluation]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1990, vol. 58(5), pp. 844–854.

15. Folkman S., Schaefer C., Lazarus R. [Cognitive processes as Mediators of stress and Coping]. Human Stress and Cognition: An information processing approach. Chapter 9. Ed. V. Hamilton, D. M. Warburton. Chichester: Wiley Publ., 1979, pp. 265–298.

16. Bodrov V. A. [Information stress]: monograph. Moscow: Per SE Publ., 2000, 352 p. (In Russian)

17. Kulikovskiy V. V., Bokovikov A. M. [Information loads with mental activity and asthenic syndrome]. Physiology of man, 1993, no. 1, pp. 75–77. (In Russian)

18. Nikulina N. Iu., Gudakova E. V. [Risks of the Modern Information Society]. Young Scientist, 2015, no. 1, pp. 361–363. Available at: https://moluch.ru/archive/81/14763/ (accessed January 24, 2013). (In Russian)

19. Reber Arthur S. [A great explanatory psychological dictionary]. Transl. with English. Moscow: Veche Publ.; AST, 2000, vol. 2 (P – Ya), 560 p. (In Russian)

20. Mammut L. S. [State in the context of globalization]. Law and Politics, 2004, no. 1, pp. 4–13. (In Russian)

21. Buunk B. P. Schauffeli W. B.]Burnout: A perspective from social comparison theory. Professional burnout: Resect developments the theory and research]. Ed. W. B. Schauffeli, S. C. Maslach and T. Marek. Washington DC: Taylor and Francis Publ., 1993, pp. 53–69.

22. Mischel W. [Personality dispositions revisited and revised: A view after three decades]. In: L. A. Pervin (Ed.). Handbook of personality: Theory of and Research. N.Y; London: Guilford Press Publ., 1990, pp. 111–134.

23. [The automated workplace of military psychologist: method Leadership]. Moscow: DIP Publ., 2012, 320 p. (In Russian)


Supplementary files

For citation: Sobolnikov V.V., Irgit V.V. THE PROBLEM OF THE INDIVIDUAL STABILITY OF THE OPERATOR TO INFORMATION STRESS UNDER RISK CONDITIONS. Professional education in the modern world. 2018;8(2):1940-1951. https://doi.org/10.15372/PEMW20180224

Views: 469

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2224-1841 (Print)