.png)
.png)
Email this article 
REPRESENTATIONS OF THE TEACHER ON THE PREFERRED FORMS OF DIDACTIC COMMUNICATION WITH THE TRAINING
https://doi.org/10.15372/PEMW20180218
Abstract
The article is dedicated to the problem of the educational communication in the light of trainee’s reflection. The author proceedes from the supposition that trainee’s notions play the great part in the accomplishment of the effective educational communication with the teacher. As the subject of our research the trainee’s notions about the goals of educational communication with the teacher, the notions about educatory effect and forms of educational communication, the trainee’s implicit criteria concerning the educational communication are considered. The research was carried out on the base of the peer-groups of the first year students of Tsiolkovski State University (in total number 62 persons). The author’s questionnairy was used. According the data our probationers consider the development of own psychological competence as the main goal of the educational communication with the teacher. The trainees have shown preference to the communicative forms of the educational interaction. The students implicitly have rated the educational communication by the criteria of the personal importance of the didactic item and the psychological competence of the educatory effect.
About the Author
P. V. MenshikovRussian Federation
Petr V. Menshikov – Ph.D., Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Department of Developmental Psychology.
Stepana Razina str., 26, 248023, Kaluga.
References
1. Bondarevskaia E. V. [Valuable foundations of personally oriented education]. Pedagogics. 1995, no. 4, pp. 29–36. (In Russian)
2. Menshikov P. V., Arpentieva M. R. [New educational practices in the context of the communicative approach]. Professional education in the modern world, 2017, no. 3, pp. 1179–1185. (In Russian)
3. Shteinmetz A. E., Gorbacheva E. I., Filatova G. D., Menshikov P. V., Fomin A. E. [Psychological tasks to pedagogical practice of students]. Moscow: VLADOS, 2002, 128 p. (In Russian)
4. Haenen J. Piotr Galperin: Psychologist in Vygotsky’s footsteps. Commack; N. Y.: Nova Science Publishers Publ., 1996, 280 p.
5. Marton F., Säljö R. Approaches to learning. Ed. F. Marton, D. Hounsell, N. J. Entwistle. The Experience of Learning. Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press Publ., 1997, pp. 39–58.
6. [Studies in reading and literacy in the Psychological Institute for 100 years]. Ed. N. L. Karpova, G. G. Granik, M. K. Cobbard. Moscow: Russian School Library Association, PI RAO, 2013, 432 p. (In Russian)
7. Minigalieva M. R. [The study of psychology and self-knowledge of person]. Moscow: RSSU Press Publ., 2006, 205 p. (In Russian)
8. Entwistle N., Ramsden P. [Understanding student learning]. London: Croom Helm Publ., 1983, 330 p.
9. Knowles M. S. [The modern practice of adult education from pedagogy to andragogy]. Chicago, 1980, 273 p.
10. Granik G. G., Bondarenko S. M., Kontsevaia L. A. [How to teach to work with a book]. Moscow: Obrazovaniye Publ., 1995, 256 p. (In Russian)
11. Kan-Kalik V.A. [Grammar of communication]. Moscow, 1995, 108 р. (In Russian)
12. Sukhomlinskiy V. A. [Conversation with the young school principal]. Moscow: Prosveshchenie Publ., 1973, 204 p. (In Russian)
13. Entwistle N. J. [Teaching for Understanding at University]. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan Publ., 2009, 208 р.
14. Arpentieva M. R., Menshikov P. V., Moiseeva Т. V. [Didactic communication: the ability to learn and the ability to teach]. Kaluga: KSU Press Publ., 2017, 353 p. (In Russian)
Supplementary files
For citation: Menshikov P.V. REPRESENTATIONS OF THE TEACHER ON THE PREFERRED FORMS OF DIDACTIC COMMUNICATION WITH THE TRAINING. Professional education in the modern world. 2018;8(2):1896-1901. https://doi.org/10.15372/PEMW20180218
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
