FORMATION OF MODERN EDUCATIONAL MODELS AND EDUCATION PRINCIPLES BY MEANS OF CREATIVITY BY IA.A. KOMENSKII (THE CONTEXT OF TRUST COMMUNICATION SPACE)


https://doi.org/10.15372/PEMW20180215

Full Text:




Abstract

The article analyses the principles of training and education in the system of Ia. A. Komenskii in the context of possible creation of the trust communication space in the educational environment. The author highlights the following basic principles of educational system of Ia. Komenskii: the principle of the highest value of knowledge; integrity of education and moral education; nonviolence and tolerance; universality and universality of education; homogeneity of the environment; social communication; lifelong learning; equality of all students (subjects of the educational process) and love. The paper considers the possibility of building modern educational model based on the ideas of the great teacher and thinker, taking into account the psychological aspects of learning when forming the cognitive model. The author attempts to describe the stages of the cognitive model in relation to the texts of Ia. A. Komenskii; he makes conclusion that, concerning text analysis, the modeling method can have unlimited capacities. At the same time, the author highlights the possible problems arising in the process of interpretation: between semantics as an area of values defining the «field» of meanings, further understanding and interpretation, and the syntax understood as a combination of language characters, and the principal nonreducibility of the semantic component to the syntax. Inevitably, «putting» semantic characteristics in the model at the first stage of its creation, in the future, in the process of verification, including, perhaps, the analysis of statistics, we will have to somehow transform the qualitativity of semantic characteristics into formalized syntax characters for their processing. This raises another problem seen as the subjective interpretation of the data by the researcher. After receiving the formal results, it will be necessary to “start” the reverse process – «from syntax to semantics». How it will be possible to correctly implement the mechanism of such transformation in both directions – this question is still open and requires further research.

About the Author

E. A. Avtandilian
Lomonosov Moscow State University.
Russian Federation

Evgenii A. Avtandilian – Candidate of Sociology, Associate Professor at the Chair of Language and Communication Philosophy.

27 Lomonosov Av., Building 4, 119991 Moscow.



References

1. [Official website of the club of Rome]. Available at: http://www.clubofrome.org (accessed February 13, 2018).

2. Avtandilian E.A. [J. J. Rousseau and the new methodology of educational processes. National and foreign pedagogics]. Moscow, 2012. (In Russian)

3. Skripkina T.P. [Psychology of trust]. Moscow: Akademiya Publ., 2000, 264 p. (In Russian)

4. Komenskii Ia.A. [Pampady]. Available at: http://jorigami.ru/PP_corner/Classics/Komensky/Komensky_%20Yan_Amos_Pampedia_izbr.htm (accessed February 13, 2018). (In Russian)

5. Komenskii Ia.A. [GreatDidactics]. Available at: http://jorigami.ru/PP_corner/Classics/Komensky/Komensky_Yan_Amos_Velikaya_didakt_izbr.htm(accessed February 13, 2018). (In Russian)

6. Chalmers D. [Conscious mind: searching for fundamental theory]. Moscow: Librokom Publ., 2015, 512 p. (In Russian)

7. Avtandilian E.A. [Trinitarian model of post-nonclassical methodology as an explication of Hinduism]. Megapolis Management, 2015, no. 4(46), pp. 14–19 (In Russian)

8. Meskov V.S., Mamchenko A. A. [Education for knowledge societies: post-nonclassical model of education processes]. Values and Meanings, 2010, no. 2(5), pp. 17–49 (In Russian)

9. Meskov V.S. [Methodology of Trinitarianism]. Problems of Philosophy, 2013, pp. 66–76. (In Russian)

10. Zolian S.T. [Endless labyrinth of couplings]: the semantics of a text as a multidimensional structure]. Criticism and semiotics, 2013, no. 1(18), pp. 18–44. (In Russian)

11. Searle G. [How can we solve the problem ‘consciousness – body’?] Moscow: Idea Press Publ., 2014, 108 p. (In Russian)

12. Avtandilian E.A. [S. I. Hessen and humanization of Russian education in the context of a return to spiritual and cultural values]. Scientific almanac, 2015, no. 8(10), pp. 1425–1429. (In Russian)

13. Barlo D. K. [The process of Communication. An Introduction to Theory and Practice]. N. Y., 1960.

14. Bugental J.F.T. [Talking: The fundamentals of humanistic professional communication]. Santa Rosa, CA: Author Publ., 1980.

15. Bugental J.F.Т. [Seek a wild god]. AHP Perspective. 1980. March, p. 8.

16. [Greeting and Maintaining Trust]. Training and development, 1995, December.

17. Lahno B. [Trust, Reputation and Exit in Exchange Relationships]. J. of Conflict Resolution, 1995, vol. 39(3).

18. May R. [Love and will]. New York: Norton Publ., 1969.


Supplementary files

For citation: Avtandilian E.A. FORMATION OF MODERN EDUCATIONAL MODELS AND EDUCATION PRINCIPLES BY MEANS OF CREATIVITY BY IA.A. KOMENSKII (THE CONTEXT OF TRUST COMMUNICATION SPACE). Professional education in the modern world. 2018;8(2):1868-1875. https://doi.org/10.15372/PEMW20180215

Views: 389

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2224-1841 (Print)