FORESHORTENINGS AND TECHNOLOGIES OF PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH OF ACADEMIC SESSION

The psychological analysis of the lesson is  a complex procedure that makes it possible to investigate the psychological validity and expediency of the teacher’s actions, as well as to implement a more harmonious and successful design of lessons in the future. The subject of psychological research / reflection is the behavioral acts (acts and actions) of the teacher: the teacher, the teacher in the class, and the forms of activity of schoolchildren / students caused by them. There are following aspects of the analysis: 1. goal setting of the lesson and its design, 2. psychology of organizing the cognitive activity of students, 3. motivation of students’ learning activities and building relationships with them, 4. Style and other features of professional communication and didactic communication in general, 5. professional reflection. Despite the importance of cognitive, motivational and interactive aspects of actual interaction, professional reflection and goal setting of the specialist play the greatest role in the success of classes and design. The goal setting allows assessing the features of the educator’s skills in the field of design and construction, reflection – to influence the development of this knowledge and skills. The use of the A. E. Steinmetz scheme of psychological analysis of the training session allows future and working teachers to model a psychologically meaningful way of pedagogical interaction, in which not one is presented, but the system of components of psychological preparation for pedagogical activity. in their professional development and development, the student and teacher move from an analysis of the activities and actions of individual participants to a holistic picture of interaction, uniting their specific, positive and negative, greater or lesser contributions to the design, implementation and reflection of employment, and its various aspects: value-motivational, cognitive, communicative.

1. Bondarevskaia E. V. [Valuable foundations of personally oriented education]. Pedagogics, 1995, no. 4, pp. 29–36. (In Russian)

2. Granik G. G., Bondarenko S. M., Kontsevaya L. A. [How to teach to work with a book]. Moscow: Obrazovanie Publ., 1995, 256 pp. (In Russian)

3. [Studies on reading and literacy in the Psychological Institute for 100 years]. Ed. N. L. Karpova, G. G. Granik, M. K. Cobbard. Moscow: Russian School Library Association Publ., 2013, 432 pp. (In Russian)

4. Haenen J. Piotr Gal’perin: Psychologist in Vygotsky’s footsteps. Commack, New York: Nova Science Publ., 1996, 280 pp.

5. Knowles M. S. The modern practice of adult education from pedagogy to andragogy. Chicago, 1980, 273 pp.

6. Shteinmetz A. E., Gorbacheva E. I., Filatova G. D., Menshikov P. V., Fomin A. E. [Psychological tasks to pedagogical practice of students: a handbook for teachers]. Moscow: VLADOS Publ., 2002, 128 pp.

7. Sukhomlinsky V. A. [Conversation with the young school principal]. Moscow: Prosveshchenie Publ., 1973, 204 pp.

8. Entwistle N. J. Teaching for Understanding at University. Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan Publ., 2009, 208 pр.

9. Entwistle N., Ramsden P. Understanding student learning. London: Croom Helm Publ., 1983, 330 pp.

10. Marton F. & Säljö R. Approaches to learning. In: F. Marton, D. Hounsell, N. J. Entwistle (Eds.). The Experience of Learning. Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press Publ., 1997, pp. 39–58.

11. Arpentieva M. R., Menshikov P. V., Moiseeva Т. V. [Didactic communication: the ability to learn and the ability to teach]. Kaluga: KSU Press Publ., 2017, 353 pp.

12. Menshikov P. V., Arpentieva M. R. [New educational practices in the context of communicative approach]. Professional education in the modern world, 2017, no. 3, pp. 1179–1185. DOI: 10.15372/PEMW20170306 (In Russian)

13. Minigalieva M. R. [Study on Psychology and self-knowledge of person]. Moscow: RSSU Press Publ., 2006, 205 pp.

14. Kan-Kalik V.A. [Grammar of communication]. Moscow: Rospedagentstvo Press Publ., 1995, 108 pр.