«Online against desire»: involvement and responsibility


https://doi.org/10.20913/10.20913/2618-7515-2021-1-24

Full Text:




Abstract

The article discusses the theoretical and methodological bases of the prospects for interacting online and offline education. It analyzes the philosophical, psychological-pedagogical and socio-psychological foundations of the educational process effectiveness. The phenomena of involvement and responsibility are studied as the most important interdisciplinary categories. The paper mentions the role of these concepts in the methodological solu- tions proposed by the authors on the organization of the educational process in the context of the mandatory use of online technologies. EOSC (Educational online social contract) and META (Methodology for expert text analy- sis) are described as methodological solutions. The authors present the philosophical and socio-psychological basis of these methodological solutions; describe the reaction of experts to the practical application of META in the real educational process in details. They show that this methodology demonstrates the efficiency of analytical activities in various professional and academic areas, both online and offline. The article underlines the significance of using these principles within the foresight methodology frameworks in the context of turbulence in educational and other social processes caused by the pandemic conditions. The paper represents for the first time EOSC methodology in the public space, and demonstrates META capabilities in "online against desire" situation. The research is based on such methodological concepts as informal text analytics (NAT), discourse analysis, conceptual analysis.

About the Authors

G. V. Sorina
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation

Galina V. Sorina – Doctor of Philosophical Sciences, Professor, Department of Philosophy of Language and Communication, Faculty of Philosophy, scientific head, Science-Educational Center, Faculty of Philosophy «Philosophic-Methodological Design and Decision-Making»

1, Lenin Hills, Moscow, 119991



A. M. Rikel
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation

Alexander M. Rikel – Candidate of Social Psychology, Associate Professor, Department of Social Psychology, Faculty of Psychology

1, Lenin Hills, Moscow, 119991



References

1. Seaman J. E., Allen I. E. (2018) Grade Increase: Tracking Distance Education in the United States // Babson Survey Research Group.

2. Yuan L., Powell S. (2013) MOOCs and disruptive innovation: Implications for higher education // eLearning Papers, In-depth. Vol. 33. 2. P. 1–7.

3. Meyer K. A. (2010) If Higher Education Is a Right, and Distance Education Is the Answer, Then Who Will Pay? // Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks. Vol. 14. 1. P. 45–68.

4. Sorina G.V., Mes'kov V.S. (2013) Sotsiokul'turnoe izmerenie obrazovatel'nogo prostranstva // Tsennosti i smysly. № 5. 2013. S. 82-98. [In Russian]

5. Trust and the virtual organization. Harvard Business Review May-June 1995. P. 2-8 // http://library.cust.edu.pk/teacher_resources/Cases&Articles/Information-Technology/InformationSystems/TrustandtheVirtualOrganization.pdf (web Resource) (access date 28.01.2021).

6. Kochergin D.G., Zhernov E.E. (2019) Opyt tsifrovizatsii vysshego obrazovaniya v SShA // Mezhdunarodnaya nauchno-prakticheskaya konferentsiya «Professional'noe obrazovanie i zanyatost' molodezhi: XXI vek. Podgotovka kadrov dlya tsifrovoi ekonomiki». Professional'noe obrazovanie v Rossii i za rubezhom 2 (34) P. 12-23 [In Russian].

7. Kentnor H. (2015) Distance Education and the Evolution of Online Learning in the United States // Curriculum and Teaching Dialogue. 17. 1–2. 28–29

8. Sorina G. V. (2019) Sovremennoe obrazovatel'noe prostranstvo: vzaimodeistvie mezhdu onlain- i oflain-obrazovaniem // Tsennosti i smysly. 2019.No 3 (61). P. 6–22 [In Russian].

9. Pange A., Pange J. (2011) Is E-Learning Based on Learning Theories? A Literature Review // World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology. Vol. 5. No 8. P. 56–60.

10. Burke L. (2013) Educational and Online Technologies and the Way We Learn // International Schools Journal. Vol. XXXII. No 2. P. 57–65.

11. Mayer R. (2015) Coursera Partners’ Conference // Keynote Plenary. New- port Beach, CA. https://www.coursera.org/learn/coursera-partners-por- tal /lecture/anwb6/richard-mayer-keynote-plenary

12. Shilko R.S., Egorov S.Yu., Zinchenko Yu.P. (2020) Problema samoregulyatsii uchebnoi deyatel'nosti v massovykh otkrytykh onlain kursakh / Gertsenovskie chteniya: psikhologicheskie issledovaniya v obrazovanii. 3. 632-639. DOI: 10.33910/herzenpsyconf-2020-3-104 [In Russian].

13. Daniel, J. (2012) Making sense of MOOCs: Musings in a maze of myth, paradox and possibility. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, vol. 3, art. 18. DOI: 10.5334/2012-18

14. Floratos, N., Guasch, T., Espasa, A. (2015) Recommendations on formative assessment and feedback practices for stronger engagement in MOOCs. Open Praxis, vol. 7 (2), P. 141–152. DOI: 10.5944/openpraxis.7.2.194

15. Hew, K. F. (2015) Towards a Model of Engaging Online Students: Lessons from MOOCs and Four Policy Documents. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, vol. 5 (6), P. 425–431.

16. Kiuru K.V., Popova E.E. (2018) Problema studencheskoi vovlechennosti v protsess obucheniya v usloviyakh onlain-obrazovaniya // Problemy sovremennogo pedagogicheskogo obrazovaniya..No 59-3. P.380-383 [In Russian].

17. Sorina G.V. (2017) Metodologiya ekspertnogo analiza teksta (MEAT) v obrazovatel'nom protsesse M. // https://www.litres.ru/g-v-sorina/metodologiya-ekspertnogo-analiza-teksta-meat-v-obrazovatelnom-processe/ [Web Resource] (access date 28.01.2021) [In Russian].

18. Mironov V. V. (2006) Kommunikatsionnoe prostranstvo kak faktor transformatsii sovremennoĭ kul'tury i filosofii // Voprosy filosofii. 2006. No 2. P. 27–43 [In Russian].

19. Girenok F.I. (2015) Klipovoe soznanie. M. Izdatel'stvo: Prospekt. 2015 [In Russian].

20. Levin K. (2000) Razreshenie sotsial'nykh konfliktov / [Per. s angl. I. Yu. Avidon]. — SPb. Rech'. [In Russian].

21. Karpenko A.S. (2016) Razvitie mnogoznachnoi logiki. M.: URSS. 448p. [In Russian].

22. Sorina G. V. (2019) Kommunikativnyi kharakter logicheskogo korpusa rabot Aristotelya // Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 7: Filosofiya. Izd-vo Moskovskogo universiteta, 2019.No 5, P. 65-71. [In Russian].

23. Dlugach T.B. (2013) Russo i obshchestvennyi dogovor // Istoriko-filosofskii ezhegodnik. M.: IF RAN. P. 177-190. [In Russian].

24. Pronskikh V.S. (2019) Ontologiya kollektivnogo eksperimentatora: ot gruppy Al'varetsa k megasaiens // Epistemologiya i filosofiya nauki. Vol. 56. 4. P. 165–182. [In Russian].

25. Frantsuzskie studenty stradayut ot odinochestva. 25.01.2021. Euronews [web Resource]. https://ru.euronews.com/2021/01/25/france-students-facing-covid (access date 28.01.2021) [In Russian].

26. Konferentsiya trudovogo kollektiva i obuchayushchikhsya MGU // Sait MGU [web Resource]. https://www.msu.ru/news/konferentsiya-trudovogo-kollektiva-i-obuchayushchikhsya-mgu.html?sphrase_id=3274201 (access date 28.01.2021) [In Russian].

27.


Supplementary files

For citation: Sorina G.V., Rikel A.M. «Online against desire»: involvement and responsibility. Professional education in the modern world. 2021;11(1):214-225. https://doi.org/10.20913/10.20913/2618-7515-2021-1-24

Views: 322

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2224-1841 (Print)