The navigator on open educational resources is the key to improving natural science education

   Introduction. This article examines the role of science education in the social and economic development of society.

   Emphasis is placed on the importance of scientific literacy and the use of information and communication technologies (ICT) to improve the quality of education.

   Particular attention is paid to the use of open educational resources (OER) as an effective tool for modernizing science education.

   Purpose setting. The problem of finding and effectivelyusing OER is becoming particularly acute in the context of the transformation of educational reforms in Russia and the growing volume of information resources. This work aims to analyze the current state of OER and develop a special tool – the «Navigator for OER in Natural Sciences» – designed to increase the accessibility of high-quality educational materials.

   Methodology and methodology of the study. An integrated approach was used, including a theoretical analysis of scientific publications, a survey of teachers and students, as well as comparative and generalizing data processing methods. The sample included 26 publications and the results of a survey involving 12 teachers and 95 students from Novosibirsk universities.

   Considerable attention was paid to the experience of scientific libraries in creating digital educational spaces and the compliance of resource selection criteria with the needs of educational institutions.

   Results. The study found that the use of OER has a positive impact on student academic performance and motivation. The «OER Navigator for Natural Sciences» was developed and tested, significantly reducing search time and increasing the availability of high-quality educational materials. This tool allows faculty and students to quickly find the information they need, saving time and resources.

   Conclusion: The creation of the «OER Navigator» represents a significant step forward in the development of educational practices and achieving high-quality science education in Russia. Research libraries are important partners in supporting the implementation of OER, providing high-quality methodological support and informational support to faculty and students.

1. Kolysheva Z. I., Surtaeva N. N., Margolina Zh. B. Natural science education in Russia: development problems. Man and education, 2017, no. 2 (51), pp. 38–42. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/estestvennonauchnoe-obrazovanie-v-rossii-problemy-razvitiya (accessed 10. 15. 2025). (in Russ.)

2. Kommers P. Open Educational Resources. Sources for a Better Education: Lessons from Research and Best Practices. Cham: springer international publishing, 2022, pp. 453–474. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-88903-6_31

3. UNESCO recommendation on open educational resources. 2019. URL: http://portal.unesco.org/en/ev.phpURL_ID=49556&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html (accessed 10. 26. 2025).

4. Orr D., Rimini M., Van Damme D. Open Educational Resources: A catalyst for innovation, educational research and innovation. Paris: organisation for economic co-operation and development (OECD), 2015. DOI: 10.1787/9789264247543-en

5. Alieva N. Z. The concept of the quality of higher natural science education in Russia. Competence, 2007, no. 8 (49), pp. 49–51. URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_12795878_59388711.pdf (accessed 10. 10. 2025). (in Russ.)

6. National project «Education»: digital educational environment. URL: https://lic-int-pos-im-marshala-zhukova-r38.gosweb.gosuslugi.ru/natsionalnyy-proekt-obrazovanie/tsifrovaya-obrazovatelnaya-sreda (accessed 10. 21. 2025). (in Russ.)

7. Vanyukova T. V., Zuev P. V., Yantser O. V. Current state and prospects of development of natural-science education of school and university (on the example of USPU). Pedagogical education in Russia, 2016, no. 6, pp. 35–39. URL: https://pedobrazovanie.ru/images/JOURNAL/archive2016/2016–6-tx1c/5.pdf (accessed 15. 10. 2025). (in Russ.)

8. Bernacki M. L., Greene J. A., Crompton H. Mobile technology, learning, and achievement: Advances in understanding and measuring the role of mobile technology in education. Contemporary educational psychology, 2020, vol. 60, p. 101827. DOI: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2019.101827

9. Mullens A. M., Hoffman B. The Affordability Solution: a Systematic Review of Open Educational Resources. Educational psychology review, 2023, vol. 35, no. 72. DOI: 10.1007/s10648-023-09793-7

10. Feldman-Maggor Y., Rom A., Tuvi-Arad I. Integration of open educational resources in undergraduate chemistry teaching – a mapping tool and lecturers’ considerations. Chemistry education research and practice, 2016, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 283–295. DOI: 10.1039/C5RP00184F.

11. Vakhrusheva T. S. Application of augmented reality technologies in education. Science of the present and future, 2017, vol. 1, pp. 37–39. URL: https://elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_29870057_71266305.pdf (accessed 15. 10. 2025). (in Russ.)

12. Gnitskaya T. N., Drozdova E. M. The quality of natural science education in the conditions of digitalization of the educational environment. Society. Communication. Education, 2021, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 56–64. DOI: 10.18721/JHSS.12105. (in Russ.)

13. Leshkova O. V., Lunev K. A. The use of virtual laboratories for the study of natural sciences. Innovative science, 2023, no. 5–2, pp. 41–44. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/ispolzovanie-virtualnyh-laboratoriy-dlya-izucheniya-estestvennyh-nauk/viewer (accessed 10. 19. 2025). (in Russ.)

14. Siregar N., Aziza S. Optimization of facilities and infrastructure management in improving the quality of learning. Jurnal Tarbiyah, 2021, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 30–43. DOI: 10.30829/tar.v28i1.905

15. Bakanova I. G., Kapustina L. V., Kozyreva M. P. Development of an educational scenario of learning using virtual reality technology. Pedagogical education in Russia, 2024, no. 3, pp. 25–30. URL: https://pedobrazovanie.ru/images/3–2024/3-2024-25-30.pdf (accessed 10. 11. 2025). (in Russ.)

16. Merchant Z., Goetz E. T., Keeney-Kennicutt W., Kwok O.-M., Cifuentes L., Davis T. J. The learner characteristics, features of desktop 3D virtual reality environments, and college chemistry instruction: a structural equation modeling analysis. Computers & education, 2012, vol. 59, pp. 551–568. DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2012.02.004

17. Daineko E. A., Ipalakova M. T., Tsoi D. D., et al. The use of virtual reality technology for studying physics. Bulletin of the Kazakh National University. Physics series, 2019, no. 1 (68), pp. 112–119. EDN: RFRZDY. DOI: 10.26577/rcph-2019-1-1103. (in Russ.)

18. Feldman-Maggor Y., Rom A., Tuvi-Arad I. Integration of open educational resources in undergraduate chemistry teaching – a mapping tool and lecturers’ considerations. Chemistry education research and practice, 2016, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 283–295. DOI: 10.1039/C5RP00184F

19. Grieger K., Leontyev A. Teaching Green Chemistry Through Student-Generated Open Educational Resources. Journal of college science teaching, 2023, vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 18–23. DOI: 10.1080/0047231X.2023.12290628

20. Parisky A., Boulay R. Designing and developing open education resources in higher education: A molecular biology project. International journal of technology, knowledge and society, 2013, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 145–156. DOI: 10.18848/1832–3669/cgp/v09i02/56376

21. Green N. H., Walter M., Anderton B. N. The Explorer’s Guide to Biology: a free multimedia educational resource to promote deep learning and understanding of the scientific process. Journal of microbiology & biology education, 2022, vol. 23, no. 1, p. e00257–21. DOI: 10.1128/jmbe.00257–21

22. Lodygina A. S., Mironov A. N. Electronic educational resource «Theory of functions of a complex variable» for bachelors of the direction «Mathematics and Physics». Skif. Student science issues, 2021, no. 5 (57), pp. 524–528. URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=46276388 (accessed 11. 01. 2025). (in Russ.)

23. Protasovsky A. K. Development of cognitive interest of students in studying the subject «Geography» through author’s electronic educational resources. «Pedagogical workshop «MASTER GEO-2021»», 2021, pp. 91–94. URL: https://elib.bsu.by/handle/123456789/271816 (accessed 10. 09. 2025). (in Russ.)

24. Budke A., Hindmarsh K. Promotion of Geography Student Teachers’ Abilities to Diagnose Pupils’ Written Argumentation Skills with the Help of a Diagnostic Tool. Re-visioning Geography: Supporting the SDGs in the post-COVID era. Cham: springer international publishing, 2023, pp. 3–18. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-40747-5_1

25. Singh-Pillay A., Samuel M. A. Life sciences teachers negotiating professional development agency in changing curriculum times. EURASIA journal of mathematics, science and technology education, 2017, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 1749–1763. DOI: 10.12973/eurasia.2017.00696a

26. Order of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation of February 24, 2021, no. 118 (as amended on July 24, 2023). Laws, codes and regulations of the Russian Federation. URL: https://legalacts.ru/doc/prikaz-minobrnauki-rossii-ot-24022021-n-118-ob-utverzhdenii/ (accessed 10. 19. 2025). (in Russ.)