The specifics of theological education in the system of modern scientific knowledge
https://doi.org/10.20913/2224-1841-2025-3-16
Abstract
Introduction. The article examines the position and specifics of theology as an academic discipline within contemporary scientific knowledge. Purpose setting. Objections against theology as one of the humanities are based on the secular mindset that solidified during the Modern era. To clarify the nature of theology as a science, it is necessary to actualize the post-secular paradigm that began to form by the end of the 20th century. Methodology and methods of the study. The study employs the method of conceptual analysis, which allowed for the identification and construction of logical foundations to determine the specifics of theological knowledge and education. Results. It has been established that the secular worldview has lost its objective critical stance toward religious perspectives. The emerging post-secular paradigm exhibits syncretism and pluralism concerning forms of truth in knowledge. A consequence of this process is the return of theology to scientific discourse and, accordingly, to the education system. The necessity of dividing theology into secular and specifically religious branches is substantiated, which could contribute to the development of theological knowledge and clarify its actual value in the secular domain. Spiritual seminaries and universities, which possess secular accreditation as higher educational institutions, are now capable of providing the humanities discourse with a unique experience of understanding the Christian tradition. The article also discusses the general practical significance of theology, exemplified by the issue of digitalization. Conclusion. As a possible interdisciplinary consideration, the concept of theo-aesthetics is proposed as a distinctive way of contemplating the transcendent essence of the world through the manifestation of the beauty of creation. It is suggested to utilize the axiological potential of theology as a humanitarian discipline in addressing the practical challenges faced by contemporary education.
About the Author
M. P. RomanovRussian Federation
Marat P. Romanov – master, specialization in history, assistant
90 Mira Ave., Krasnoyarsk, 660049, Russian Federation
References
1. Fricker M. Epistemic Injustice. Power and the Ethics of Knowing. New York: Oxford University Press, 2007, 188 p.
2. Gettier E. L. Is Justified True Belief Knowledge? Analysis, 1963, vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 121–123, DOI: 10.1093/analys/23.6.121
3. Anscombe G. E. M. Modern Moral Philosophy. Philosophy: The Journal of the Royal Institute of Philosophy, 1958, vol. XXXIII, no. 124, pp. 1–19.
4. MacIntyre A. After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory. L., 1981; MacIntyre A. Whose Justice? Which Rationality? NotreDame, Ind., 1988, p. 410.
5. Open letter of ten academicians of the Russian Academy of Sciences to the President of the Russian Federation V. V. Putin. (2007). Science in Siberien, 28–29 (2613 2614). (in Russ.)
6. Shturbabin S. A., prot., Orlov M. O., Petrova K. Yu. Theological knowledge in the secular educational space: problems and ways of developing dialogue. Trudy Proceedings of the Saratov Orthodox Theological Seminary, 2022, no. 2 (17), pp. 59–80. (in Russ.)
7. Shmonin D. V. Theology of Education: an introduction to the Subject. Questions of theology, 2021, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 460–477. DOI: 10.21638/spbu28.2021.401 (in Russ.)
8. Kyrlezhev A. The Postsecular: a brief interpretation. Logos, 2011, no. 3 (82), pp. 100–107. (in Russ.)
9. Tejlor Ch. The Secular Age. Transl. from engl. A. Vasil’eva, L. Kolkera, A. Luk’yanova. Moscow, BBI Publ., 2017. (in Russ.)
10. Priluckij A. M., Shmonin D. V. Institutionalization of theology: experience and prospects. Bulletin of St. Petersburg University. Philosophy and conflictology, 2022, vol. 38, ess. 2, pp. 254–263. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu17.2022.209 (in Russ.)
11. Kapriev G. Four synthesis centers. Transl. from bulg. G. V. Vdovinoj. St. Petersburg, Teoestetika Publ., 2022, 704 p. (in Russ.)
12. Jeger V. Early Christianity and Greek Paideia. Moscow, Greko-latinskijkabinet Yu. A. Shichalina, 2014, 216 p. (in Russ.)
13. Bal’tazar G. U. fon. Thank the Lord. Theological Aesthetics. Vol. 1: Contemplation of form. Moscow, BBI Publ., 2019, XIV + 659 p. (in Russ.)
14. Hart D. B. The Beauty of the Infinite: The Aesthetics of Christian Truth. Moscow, BBI Publ., 2010, 673 p. (in Russ.)
15. Manussakis Dzh. P. God after metaphysics. Theological aesthetics. Kiev, DUH I LITERA, 2014, 416 p. (in Russ.)
16. Habermas J. Religion in the Public Sphere. European Journal of Philosophy, 2006, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 1–25.
17. Kaputo Dzh. How the secular world became post-secular. Logos, 2011, no. 3 (82), p. 192. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/kak-sekulyarnyy-mir-stal-postsekulyarnym (accessed 11.04.2024). (in Russ.)
18. Barashkov V. V., Begchin D. A., Kruglova I. N. Temple architecture in the context of theoesthetics: an interdisciplinary approach. Bulletin of Tomsk State University. Philosophy. Sociology. Political Science, 2024, no. 77, pp. 132–141. DOI: 10.17223/1998863Х/77/11 (in Russ.)
19. Kozlov M., prot. His Holiness Patriarch Kirill and Spiritual Education. URL: https://www.doctorantura.ru/publications/vvedenie/ (accessed 09.03.2024). (in Russ.)
20. The rule of the Holy Apostles and the Holy Father with interpretations. Rules of the Holy Apostles No. 69. Moscow, Sibirskaya Blagozvonnica Publ., 2001, 816 с. (in Russ.)
21. Patriarch Kirill: The Russian Orthodox Church is against the use of digital technologies to control personality. URL: https://tass.ru/obschestvo/10416769 (accessed 11.04.2024). (in Russ.)
22. RIA Novosti. Mikhail Klimentyev. Patriarch Kirill is concerned about distance learning. URL: https://ria.ru/20201224/patriarkh-1590775409.html (accessed 11.04.2024) (in Russ.)
23. The speech of His Holiness Patriarch Kirill at the annual act of St. Tikhon’s University. URL: http://www.patriarchia.ru/db/text/5304699.html (accessed 11.04.2024) (in Russ.)
Supplementary files
For citation: Romanov M.P. The specifics of theological education in the system of modern scientific knowledge. Professional education in the modern world. 2025;15(3):586-592. https://doi.org/10.20913/2224-1841-2025-3-16
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.












.png)
.png)






