Managing innovation stress in ensuring the sustainability of educational systems


https://doi.org/10.20913/2618-7515-2025-2-16

Full Text:




Abstract

Introduction. The problem of stress management (prevention of its escalation and taking measures to minimize it), despite its obvious importance, has not been sufficiently studied. Modern studies largely consider innovations, paying tribute to scientific and political fashion, as a phenomenon of ensuring the sustainability of the system. In practice, innovations in modern education carry a significant number of contradictions and problems that can destroy education as such. The goal of such «innovations», many of which are lobbied at the supranational level, is the formation of a society in which education does not perform either the functions of individual development, or the functions of developing groups and the community as a whole. These pseudo-innovations do not reduce, but increase tension in communities (there is an escalation of innovation stress), destroying, rather than improving education. Purpose setting. The purpose of the study is to analyze the processes and conditions of managing (escalation and minimization) innovation stress to ensure the sustainability of educational systems. The novelty of the study lies in the ongoing development of an integrative theory of innovation stress in education, namely, in the study of the processes and conditions of escalation and minimization of innovation stress to ensure the sustainability of educational systems. Methodology and methods of the study. Research methods are theoretical analysis and synthesis of the processes and conditions of escalation and minimization of innovation stress in ensuring the sustainability of educational systems. The paper presents an attempt at an integrative study of the processes and conditions of escalation and minimization of innovation stress in ensuring the sustainability of educational systems. Results. Innovation stress management in education – procedures and results of the influence of the management subject on its various aspects and levels, itself and other stakeholders in order to improve its forms and contents, processes and results, prevent escalation and minimize existing manifestations of stress. Resistance planning, assessment of the directions and processes of restoration of education and its subjects, retention as the preservation of the most valuable and important characteristics and functions of education and revival as a search and study of possibilities for transforming the system require an expanded, reflexive, intersubjective dialogue of education subjects. Based on such a dialogue, a decision can be made on the fate of the innovation, measures and conditions for minimizing negative consequences and preventing the escalation of innovation stress. Conclusion. Innovation stress management is a systemic, reflexive activity of various educational entities aimed at minimizing innovation stress and preventing its escalation in order to ensure the sustainability of educational systems. In our opinion, the prospects of the study are associated with a systemic description of such conditions under which the features of deformations of the value-target level of educational relations will determine the state of other levels (meanings and values, technologies and methods of education).


About the Authors

E. ­ ­V. Krivotulova
Voronezh State University
Russian Federation

Elena V. Krivotulova – candidate of pedagogical sciences, associate professor, associate professor of the department of pedagogy and educational psychology

1 University Square, 394018, Voronezh



L. ­ E. Filatova
Voronezh State Pedagogical University
Russian Federation

Liliya E. Filatova – candidate of psychological sciences, associate professor of the department of practical psychology

86 Lenin str., Voronezh, 394024

 



R. ­ I. Khoteeva
Tsiolkovskiy Kaluga State University
Russian Federation

Raisa I. Khoteeva – candidate of psychological sciences, associate professor, associate professor of the department of general and social psychology

26 Razin str., Kaluga, 248023



References

1. Arpentieva M.R., Gaidar K.M., Kunakovskaya L.A. The stress of innovation in education. Professional education in the modern world, 2020, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 4331–4346. (in Russ.)

2. Aksarina I.Y., Dossayeva S.K., Kosov A.V., Stepanova G.A., Akentyeva I.Y., Brovkina S.N., Kozhedyorov A.I., Arpentieva M.R., Khoteeva R.I., Kassymova G.K. Foresight innovations in educational systems in the BRICS. Bulletin of National Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Kazakhstan, 2019, vol. 4 (380), pр. 123–131.

3. Kassymova K.G., Valeeva G.V., Muller O.Yu., Anufrieva N.V., Arpentieva M.R., Lavrinenko S.V., Dossayeva S.K. Innovation in education: prevention and correction of the pediogenias and matetogenias in students and teachers. Bulletin of National Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Kazakhstan, 2019, vol. 5, no. 381, pp. 11–18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32014/2019.2518–1467.130

4. Kassymova G.K., Valeeva G.V., Stepanova O.P., Goroshchenova O.A., Gasanova R.R., Kulakova A.A., Menshikov P.V., Arpentieva M.R., Dossayeva S.K., Garbuzova G.V. Stress of the innovation and innovation in education. Bulletin of National Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Kazakhstan, 2019, vol. 6, no. 382, pp. 288–300. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32014/2019.2518–1467

5. Kassymova G.K., Aksarina I.Y., Demchuk A.V., Stepanova G.A., Aksarina Y.S. Bogach M.A., Brovkina S.N., Kosov A.V., Arpentieva M.R., Dossayeva S.K. Foresight and the role of innovation in the development of Russian education. Bulletin of National Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Kazakhstan, 2019c, vol. 4 (380), pр. 93–101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32014/2019.2518–1467.96

6. Bowen Br.D. Lessons from anticipatory intelligence: Resilient pedagogy in the face of future disruptions. Thurston T.N., Lundstrom K., González C. (Eds.), Resilient pedagogy: Practical teaching strategies to overcome distance, disruption, and distraction. Utah, USA, Utah State University, 2021, pp. 93–114. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26079/a516 fb24

7. RеhnA. Innovation for the Fatigued: How to Build a Culture of Deep Creativity. New York, Kogan Page Publishers, 2019, 224 p.

8. David J.L., Cuban L. Cutting Through the Hype: The Essential Guide to School Reform Revised. Harvard, Harvard Education Press, 2010, 220 p.

9. Arpentieva M.R. Development scenarios: dynamic capabilities of industrial clusters and foresight. Problems of management theory and practice, 2017, no. 10, pp. 50–60. (in Russ.)

10. Kerbel J. Coming to terms with anticipatory intelligence. War on the Rocks. 2019. August 13. Р. 1. URL: https://warontherocks.com/2019/08/coming-to-terms-with-anticipatory-intelligence/ (accessed 12.21.2024)

11. Office of the Director of National Intelligence [ODNI]. (2019b). Worldwide threat assessment of the US Intelligence Community (Rep.). United States of America: National Intelligence, 29 january 2019, 42 р. URL: https://www.dni.gov/files/ODNI/documents/2019ATA-SFR-SSCI.pdf (accessed 12.21.2024)

12. Office of the Director of National Intelligence [ODNI]. (2019a). National intelligence strategy of the United States of America (Rep.). United States of America: National Intelligence, 2019. 36 р. https://www.dni.gov/files/ODNI/documents/National_Intelligence_Strategy_2019.pdf?utm_source=Press%20Release&utm_medium=Email&utm_campaign=NIS_2019 (accessed 12.21.2024)

13. Azevedo, J. P., Gutierrez, M., de Hoyos, R., & Saavedra, J. The Unequal Impacts of COVID-19 on Student Learning. In: Reimers F.M. (eds.). Primary and Secondary Education During Covid-19. Cham: Springer, 2022, pp. 421–459. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978–3–030–81500-4_16

14. Kuchma V.R., Sedova A.S., Stepanova M.I., Rapoport I.K., Polenova M.A., Sokolova S.B., Aleksandrova I.E., Chubarovskiy V.V. Well-being of children and adolescents who study remotely during the epidemic of a new coronavirus infection (COVID-19). Questions of School and University Medicine and Health, 2020, vol. 2, pp. 4–23. URL: http://schoolshealth.ru/docs/2–2020/KuchmaVR_etall_2_2020_4-23.pdf (accessed 10.10.2024) (in Russ.)

15. Hargreaves A., Shirley D. Well-Being in Schools: Three Forces That Will Uplift Your Students in a Volatile World. London, SCD, 2021, 188 р.

16. Kosaretsky S., Zair-Bek S., Kersha Y., Zvyagintsev R. General Education in Russia During COVID-19: Readiness, Policy Response, and Lessons Learned. In: Reimers F.M. (eds.). Primary and Secondary Education During Covid-19. Cham, Springer, 2022, pp. 227–261. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978–3–030–81500-4_9

17. Munro A.P., Faust S.N. Children are not COVID-19 super spreaders: Time to go back to school. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 2020, vol. 105 (7), рp. 618–619.

18. ArpentievaM.R., TashchevaA.I., Gridneva S.V.Commodification of education: processes and results. Professional education in the modern world, 2019, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 2406–2420. (in Russ.).

19. Taleb N.N. Antifragile: Things that gain from disorder. London, Random House Incorporated, 2016, 546 p.


Supplementary files

For citation: Krivotulova E.­., Filatova L.E., Khoteeva R.I. Managing innovation stress in ensuring the sustainability of educational systems. Professional education in the modern world. 2025;15(2):351-359. https://doi.org/10.20913/2618-7515-2025-2-16

Views: 5

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2224-1841 (Print)