Organizational culture of professional’s personality: Features of modern content and formation in the context of digital development of the educational environment

Introduction. The authors examine the problem of forming a personality’s organizational culture with an emphasis on the becoming of a professional’s personality in modern conditions of social development.
Purpose setting. The article purpose is to identify the features of the professional personality organizational culture in the context of digital development of the educational environment.
Methodology and methods of the study. The study of the concept «organizational culture of professional’s personality» is based on the analysis and scientific generalization of publications problematizing the issues of formation of professional qualities of a modern personality that influence the formation of organizational components of its culture. The concept of organizational culture is considered in its general content with an emphasis on the totality of all cultural values created by an organization, determined by the historical and cultural context of the development of society as a whole.
Results. Through the generalization of these sources, the features of the content of the concept of «organizational culture of professional’s personality» are revealed. Based on the study of the issues of formation of the organizational culture of professional’s personality in the context of current development of the digital educational environment, it is emphasized that in the context of modern problems of the development of society, its globalization and digitalization, the issues of organizational formation of professional’s personality acquire their own specifics. It is emphasized that the organizational principles of formation of the culture in modern conditions are directly mediated by the development of various forms of network interaction in the educational system. The need for the formation of the motivational component of the organizational culture of a professional in the modern conditions of the development of the digital educational space is emphasized.
Conclusion. The contradictions between the challenges of an intensively evolving digital environment in modern conditions of development of the professional education and the personal values of professionals are reflected in the formation of the individual organizational culture, while the organizational component of personality’s general culture is called one of the most important for formation in the professional educational system. As a result, it is emphasized that one of the most important features is the mutual influence of the components of a professional’s digital culture on the components of his organizational culture in the process of becoming a person’s readiness for professional activity.

1. Milovanova Yu. V., Petrenko T. V. A modern approach to the definition of organizational culture. Problemy razvitiya predpriyatii: teoriya i praktika: sb. st. IX Mezhdunar. nauch.‑prakti. konf., Penza, 18–19 apr. 2022 g. Penza, 2022, pp. 113–116. (In Russ.).

2. Chernykh S. I., Allaham Y. S., Parshikov V. I. Education as a destructor of social order. Science for Education Today, 2021, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 81–101. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2102.04. (In Russ.).

3. Chernykh S. I. Education as fictitious capital. Professional’noe obrazovanie v sovremennom mire, 2020, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 3400–3408. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15372/PEMW20200102. (In Russ.).

4. Fedorchuk Yu. M., Morozov A. V. Education development strategy: from the international level to the level of an educational organization. Global’naya ekonomika i obrazovanie, 2021, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 73–81. (In Russ.).

5. Shalamova L. F., Vladimirova T. N., Leskonog N. Y. Provision of comprehensive secondary schools with teaching staff holding university-level degrees: with the main focus on the regions of the Russian Federation. Science for Education Today, 2022, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 111–135. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2202.06. (In Russ.).

6. Hanelt A., Bohnsack R., Marz D., Marante C. A. A systematic review of the literature on digital transformation: insights and implications for strategy and organizational change. Journal of Management Studies, 2021, vol. 58, no. 5, pp. 1159–1197. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12639.

7. Latuha O. A. Assessing the sustainability development of an organization. Science for Education Today, 2021, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 142–159. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2106.08. (In Russ.).

8. Smetanina M. D. On the issue of correlation of the concepts of «organizational culture» and «corporate culture». Gumanitarnaya paradigma, 2018, no. 3, pp. 63–69. (In Russ.).

9. Khotinets V. Yu. Cohesion between the dimensions of national culture and organizational culture. Teoreticheskie problemy etnicheskoi i krosskul’turnoi psikhologii: materialy Pyatoi mezhdunar. nauch. konf., Smolensk, 27–28 maya 2016 g. Smolensk, 2016, vol. 1, pp. 264–268. (In Russ.).

10. Kochetkova A. I. Organizational culture and culture of an organization in modern Russia. Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta kul’tury i iskusstv, 2009, no. 4, pp. 206–210. (In Russ.).

11. Kobozeva E. M. Kuznetsov S. M. Subject-substantive relationships between the concepts of «corporate culture» and «organizational culture». Molodezh’ i sistemnaya modernizatsiya strany: sb. nauch. st. 4‑i Mezhdunar. nauch. konf. studentov i molodykh uchenykh, Kursk, 21–22 maya 2019 g. Kursk, 2019, vol. 2, pp. 250–254. (In Russ.).

12. Marshuba O. A. Culture and organizational culture: the essence and interdependence of phenomena. Nauchno-metodicheskii elektronnyi zhurnal «Kontsept», 2016, no. S13, pp. 38–43. (In Russ.).

13. Sharov A. A., Konovalov A. A. Vocational education teachers’ soft-competences: assessment methodology and correlation analysis. Science for Education Today, 2022, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 7–21. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2205.01. (In Russ.).

14. Balve P., Ebert L. Ex post evaluation of a learning factory – competence development based on graduates feedback. Procedia Manufacturing, 2019, vol. 31, pp. 8–13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2019.03.002.

15. Pogodaeva M. V., Chepurko Yu. V. The study of teachers’ emotional competence and its development during training sessions. Science for Education Today, 2022, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 51–72. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2202.03. (In Russ.).

16. Ryapisov N. A. Personnel of the general education system: problems and solutions. Sovremennaya shkola Rossii. Voprosy modernizatsii, 2021, no. 8–1, pp. 73–75. (In Russ.).

17. Bravve Y. I., Shpiks T. A., Kirsch J., Pushkareva E. A., Sokolov S. V., Kiryakova I. D., Tolstova K. S., Latuha O. A. Evaluating the effectiveness of using Process Factory in the development of leadership competencies for healthcare managers. Science for Education Today, 2021, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 43–56. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2105.03. (In Russ.).

18. Chang-Kredl S., Colannino D. Constructing the image of the teacher on Reddit: best and worst teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 2017, vol. 64, pp. 43–51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.01.019.

19. Garkusha N. S., Alekseeva A. S., Asmolova L. M. Digital culture of the head of an educational institution: methodological approaches to research. Science for Education Today, 2023, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 123–147. DOI: http:// dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2304.06. (In Russ.).

20. Cattaneo A. A. P., Antonietti C., Rauseo M. How digitalised are vocational teachers? Assessing digital competence in vocational education and looking at its underlying factors. Computers & Education, 2022, vol. 176, art. 104358. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104358.

21. Khromova A. O., Bukhtayarova E. Y., Klimova A. A., Kurnosova M. A., Druzhinina M. V. Research on motivational, creative, communicative and organizational components of future educators’ readiness to use innovative technologies. Science for Education Today, 2022, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 7–25. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2204.01. (In Russ.).

22. Ryan R. M., Deci E. L. Self-determination theory: basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. New York, Guilford Press, 2017, 756 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1521/978.14625/28806.

23. Maznichenko M. A., Neskoromnykh N. I., Sadilova O. P., Brevnova S. V., Grigoraschenko-Alieva N. M., Fomenko V. A. Identification and support of gifted children within the framework of school-university networks. Science for Education Today, 2021, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 7–31. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2102.01. (In Russ.).

24. Novikov V. S., Gadzhieva E. Yu., Orudzheva S. A. Formation and development of organizational culture of network structures as an efficiency management tool. Vestnik Akademii znanii, 2020, no. 36, pp. 172–177. DOI: http:// dx.doi.org/10.24411/2304-6139-2020-00031. (In Russ.).

25. Dyakov S. I. Motivational and value constructs of personal self-organization in the semantic space of education. Science for Education Today, 2021, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 75–91. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658-6762.2101.05. (In Russ.).

26. Klaeijsen A., Vermeulen M., Martens R. Teachers’ innovative behaviour: the importance of basic psychological need satisfaction, intrinsic motivation, and occupational self-efficacy. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 2018, vol. 62, no. 5, pp. 769–782. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2017.1306803.

27. Barkova V. V., Semchenko A. A., Savchenkov A. V., Mamylina N. V. Specific features of student’s self-identification in the comparative context of analysing socio-cultural characteristics of the society. Science for Education Today, 2023, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 48–64. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2658–6762.2301.03. (In Russ.).