.png)
.png)
Email this article 
Features of academic professional and personal identity of students with disabilities
https://doi.org/10.20913/2618-7515-2023-4-20
Abstract
Introduction. The article substantiates the relevance and feasibility of studying the characteristics of the educational, professional and personal identity of students with disabilities. The need to take into account the characteristics and find ways to effectively and efficiently manage the formation and development of educational, professional and personal identity of students with disabilities is emphasized.
Purpose setting. Purpose of the study is the analysis of the characteristics of the educational, professional and personal identity of students with disabilities.
Methodology and methods of the study. Research methods are the theoretical analysis and synthesis of issues related to the educational, professional and personal identity of students with disabilities. The methodological basis of the study was a systematic approach to understanding the characteristics of the educational, professional and personal identity of students with disabilities.
Results. Currently, there are theoretical tasks of identifying the characteristics of the educational, professional and personal identity of students with disabilities, overcoming the contradictions associated with attempts to comprehend the specifics of identity and other socio-psychological characteristics of groups of students who are extremely diverse in the nature of their existing health limitations. One of the leading problems is related to the divergence of researchers' ideas about the existence, sources and nature of such differences: some researchers believe that many differences between students with and without disabilities are exaggerated. Other researchers believe that these differences are downplayed, underestimated, or insufficiently and accurately described.
Conclusion. The author summarizes the results of research into the characteristics of the educational, professional and personal identity of students with disabilities. The importance and promise of systemic, holistic work in the context of the formation and development of educational, professional and personal identity of students with disabilities is emphasized: providing conditions for the formation and development of mature educational, professional and personal identity of students with disabilities.
Keywords
About the Author
S. V. KoptyaevaRussian Federation
Svetlana V. Koptyaeva – Master of Science (Psychological and Pedagogical Education), Specialist (Social Pedagogue and Psychologist), Postgraduate Student, Applicant for a Degree Candidate of Psychological Sciences
22/48 Razina Str., Kaluga, 248 023
References
1. Maltseva T. E. Inclusive professionalization in higher education: analysis and prospects. Chelovek. Nauka. Sotsium, 2023, no. 1, pp. 180–204. (In Russ.).
2. Suslova O. I., Khmelkova O. V., Sharov A. A. Crisis stages of professional socialization of students with disabilities in the conditions of inclusive education (pilot analysis). Obshchestvo: sotsiologiya, psikhologiya, pedagogika, 2020, no. 5, pp. 113–120. (In Russ.).
3. Simatova O. B. Features of the professional intention of university students with disabilities. Baikal Research Journal, 2021, vol. 12, no. 4, art. 20. https://doi.org/10.17150/2411-6262.2021.12(4).20. (In Russ.).
4. Simatova O. B. Features of some components of the professional mentality of future teachers and psychologists. Izvestiya Baltiiskoi gosudarstvennoi akademii rybopromyslovogo flota: psikhologo-pedagogicheskie nauki, 2018, no. 3, pp. 89–96. (In Russ.).
5. Markova A. K. Psychology of professionalism. Moscow, Pedagogika, 1996, 344 p. (In Russ.).
6. Belinskaya E. P., Tikhomandritskaya O. A. Social psychology of personality: a textbook. Moscow, Aspekt Press, 2001, 301 p. (In Russ.).
7. Breakwell G. M. Resisting representations and identity processes. Papers on Social Representations, 2010, vol. 19, no. 1, art. 6.
8. Belinskaya E. P. Modern studies of identity: from structural certainty to processuality and incompleteness. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta. Psikhologiya i pedagogika, 2018, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 6–15. (In Russ.).
9. Fogelson R. D. Person, Self, and identity: some anthropological retrospects, circumspects, and prospects. Psychosocial theories of the Self: proc. of a conf. on new approaches to the Self, held March 29 – April 1, 1979, by the Center for Psychosocial Studies, Chicago, Illinois. Boston, 1982, pp. 67–109. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-4337-0_5.
10. Kucherenko S. V. Professional identity of the individual. Arkhivarius, 2021, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 29–35. (In Russ.).
11. Shneider L. B. Professional identity: structure, genesis and conditions of formation: Dr. psychol. sci. diss. Moscow, 2001, 327 p. (In Russ.).
12. Lubovsky V. I. Special educational needs. Psikhologicheskaya nauka i obrazovanie, 2013, no. 5, pp. 61–66. URL: https://psyjournals.ru/journals/psyedu/archive/2013_n5/psyedu_2013_n5_Lubovskiy.pdf (accessed 15.10.2023). (In Russ.).
13. Arpentieva M. R. Psychosocial support for persons with disabilities and their families. Saint Petersburg, Lan», 2023, 252 p. (In Russ.).
14. Kalashnikova S. A. A person with disabilities: a psychosynergetic approach to the problem of personality development in special conditions. Gumanitarnyi vektor, 2013, no. 1, pp. 172–179. (In Russ.).
15. Latysheva M. A. Psychological and pedagogical model of teaching psychology students with disabilities. Gumanitarnye nauki, 2019, no. 2, pp. 120–126. (In Russ.).
16. Shapoval I. A. The role of the boundaries of Self and non-Self in determining behavior under conditions of uncertainty. Vektor nauki Tol»yattinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Pedagogika, psikhologiya, 2017, no. 3, pp. 100–106. (In Russ.).
17. Shapoval I. A. Social inclusion of persons with disabilities de jure and de facto: «included», «self-inclusive» and «non-self-inclusive». Vestnik Baltiiskogo federal'nogo universiteta im. I. Kanta. Seriya: Filologiya, pedagogika, psikhologiya, 2019, no. 1, pp. 84–99. (In Russ.).
18. Vygotsky L. S. Development of the child's personality and worldview. Personality psychology: texts. Moscow, 1982, С. 161–165. (In Russ.).
19. Lebedeva A. A. Quality of life of persons with disabilities: from an environmental approach to a personal one. Kul'turno-istoricheskaya psikhologiya, 2012, no. 1, pp. 83–91. (In Russ.).
20. Leontyev D. A., Aleksandrova L. A. Disability challenge: from a problem to a task. Chetvertaya Vserossiiskaya nauchno-prakticheskaya konferentsiya po ekzistentsial'noi psikhologii (Moskva, 4–5 maya 2010 g.): materialy soobshchenii. Moscow, 2010, pp. 114–120. (In Russ.).
21. Kokhan S. T. (ed.). Higher inclusive education: from theory to practice. Chita, ZabGU, 2019, 210 p. (In Russ.).
22. Levitskaya I. A. Professional self-determination as a sociocultural process. Vestnik Kemerovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2014, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 136–140. (In Russ.).
Supplementary files
For citation: Koptyaeva S.V. Features of academic professional and personal identity of students with disabilities. Professional education in the modern world. 2023;13(4):787-795. https://doi.org/10.20913/2618-7515-2023-4-20
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
