.png)
.png)
Email this article 
Digital literacy of university students in non-core training directions
https://doi.org/10.20913/2618-7515-2023-4-13
Abstract
Introduction. Forming and improving the readiness and ability of students in non-core (non-IT) areas of training to effectively, productively (safely) use digital devices, programs, technologies, apply digital competencies (knowledge, abilities and skills) to solve educational problems in the context of educational and professional activities is one of the important goals of educational standards in modern universities.
Purpose setting. Purpose of the study is the analysis of the problems of the concept, structure and levels of digital literacy of university students in non-core areas of training.
Methodology and methods of the study. Research methods are theoretical analysis and synthesis of research results on the definition, structural understanding and level typology of digital literacy of modern university students in non-core areas of training. The methodological basis of the study was the conceptual provisions and principles of the competency-based and personal-activity approaches.
Results. Currently, there are theoretical tasks of developing an integrative model of digital literacy and practical tasks of increasing the digital literacy of students in non-core fields of study, including to the level where the student not only consumes digital competencies, but is able and ready to use them in the process independently or jointly with other students and teachers setting and solving educational and professional problems, including in the context of new professional specializations or even professions arising as a result of the digitalization of their work. The leading role in this process is played in the intrapersonal context by the cognitive components of literacy, and in the interpersonal context by communicative and moral-ethical ones.
Conclusions. The author summarizes the results of studies on the formation and development of digital literacy among university students in non-core areas of training. The importance and promise of systematic, holistic work in the context of the formation and development of digital literacy of university students in non-core areas of training is noted. The prospects for theoretical and empirical study of this problem are connected precisely with the study of this component and its integrative role in the formation and development of digital literacy of university students in non-core fields.
About the Author
M. A. MoiseenkovaRussian Federation
Margarita A. Moiseenkova – Post-graduate Student, Teacher of the Department of Pedagogy of Professional and Additional Education
1 Lenina Ave., Surgut, Khanty-Mansi Autonomous Okrug – Yugra, 628412
References
1. Bélisle C. Literacy and the digital knowledge revolution. Digital literacies for learning. Facet Publ., 2006, pp. 51–67. https://doi.org/10.29085/9781856049870.007.
2. Street B. V. Literacy in theory and practice. Cambridge, New York, Cambridge Univ. Press, 1984, 243 p.
3. Lankshear C., Knobel M. New literacies: changing knowledge and classroom learning. Buckingham, Philadelphia, Open Univ. Press, 2003, XIII, 223 p.
4. Baimuratova L. R., Dolgova O. A., Imaeva G. R., Gritsenko V. I., Smirnov K. V., Aimaletdinov T. A. Digital literacy for the economy of the future. Moscow, NAFI, 2018, 85 p.
5. Stepanenkova A. D. New professions in the labor market in the digital economy. Vestnik nauki, 2023, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 130–137. (In Russ.).
6. Ministry of Economic Development of the Russian Federation. Passport of the federal project «Personnel for the digital economy» of the National program «Digital economy of the Russian Federation». URL: https://digital.gov.ru/uploaded/files/ktse.pdf (accessed: 21.05.2023). (In Russ.).
7. Larionov V. G., Sheremet»eva E. N., Barinova E. P. Transformation of terminology, competencies and knowledge in the digital economy. Vestnik Astrakhanskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta. Series: Ekonomika, 2019, no. 4, pp. 21–28. (In Russ.).
8. Fateeva N. B., Petryakova S. V., Simachkova N. N., Petrova L. N., Krutikova N. F. Development of digital competencies in the education system. Obrazovanie i pravo, 2022, no. 1, pp. 112–114. https://doi.org/10.24412/2076-1503-2022-1-112-114. (In Russ.).
9. Stepanova G. A., Demchuk A. V., Arpentieva M. R. Digitalization and problems of modern Russian education. Gumanitarnye nauki, 2021, no. 3, рр. 16–27. (In Russ.).
10. Gokhberg L. M. (ed.). What is the digital economy? Trends, competencies, measurement: HSE report: for the 20th April intern. sci. conf. on problems of economic and social development, Moscow, April 9–12, 2019. Moscow, Izd. dom Vyssh. shk. ekonomiki, 2019, 82 p. (In Russ.).
11. Sukhomlin V. A., Zubareva E. V., Yakushin A. V. Methodological aspects of the concept of digital skills. Sovremennye informatsionnye tekhnologii i IT-obrazovanie, 2017, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 146–152. (In Russ.).
12. Riazantseva M. V. The development of digital competencies as a source of labor productivity growth. Ekonomika. Nalogi. Pravo, 2019, vol. 12, no. 6, pp. 77–85. DOI: 10.26794/1999-849X-2019-12-6-77-85. (In Russ.).
13. Vuorikari R., Punie Y., Carretero Gomez S., Van den Brande G. DigComp 2.0: the digital competence framework for citizens. Update phase 1: The conceptual reference model. Luxembourg, Publ. Office of the European Union, 2016, 40 p.
14. Kellner D. Technological transformation, multiple literacies, and the re-visioning of education. E-Learning and Digital Media, 2004, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 9–37. https://doi.org/10.2304/elea.2004.1.1.8.
15. Tyner K. Literacy in a digital world: teaching and learning in the age of information. New York, Routledge, 1998, 304 p. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410601971.
16. Gilster P. Digital Literacy. New York, Wiley Computer Publ., 1997, 276 p.
17. Martin A., Grudziecki J. DigEuLit: concepts and tools for digital literacy development. Innovation in Teaching and Learning in Information and Computer Sciences, 2006, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 249–267.
18. Søby M. Digital competence: from ICT skills to digital «bildung». Oslo, ITU, Univ. of Oslo, 2003, 33 p.
19. Kastel's M. Information age: economics, society and culture. Moscow, GU VShE, 2000, 608 p. (In Russ.).
20. Bukht R., Khiks R. Definition, concept and measurement of the digital economy. Vestnik mezhdunarodnykh organizatsii: obrazovanie, nauka, novaya ekonomika, 2018, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 143–172. https://doi.org/10.17323/1996-7845-2018-02-07. (In Russ.).
21. Degtyarev A. V. Work in the «cloud» as the transformation of social and labor relations in the digital economy. Kreativnaya ekonomika, 2017, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 241–248. (In Russ.).
22. Novikova I. V. Identifying the skills of workers ready for employment with signs of instability. Monitoring obshchestvennogo mneniia: ekonomicheskie i sotsial'nye peremeny, 2017, no. 6, pp. 232–249. (In Russ.).
23. Brodovskaya E. V., Dombrovskaya A. Iu., Pyrma R. V., Sinyakov A. V., Azarov A. A. Interrelation of value and competence choice of youth in the digitalization conditions: results of all-Russian research (2018). Tsennosti i smysly, 2019, no. 2, pp. 76–104. https://doi.org/10.24411/2071-6427-2019-00016. (In Russ.).
24. Arpentieva M. R. The phenomenon of digital homelessness. Vestnik Saratovskogo oblastnogo instituta razvitiia obrazovaniia, 2017, no. 2, pp. 37–40. (In Russ.).
Supplementary files
For citation: Moiseenkova M.A. Digital literacy of university students in non-core training directions. Professional education in the modern world. 2023;13(4):715-723. https://doi.org/10.20913/2618-7515-2023-4-13
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
