Education of socially responsible behavior among student youth
https://doi.org/10.20913/2618-7515-2023-2-20
Abstract
Introduction. The development of social responsibility as a personal and professional quality among young people at the university stage of their growth has become an important state goal of education today. Purpose setting. To study the components of socially responsible behavior among university students, the formation of which is carried out in the process of educational activities of curators of student groups. Methodology and methods of the study. Organizational, empirical methods (experiment, testing, questionnaire, expert survey), quantitative and qualitative analysis, methods of data interpretation were used. Results. When studying the motivational component of socially responsible behavior using the methodology «Motivation to participate in socially significant activities», it was revealed that 68% of respondents have a high level of motivation for socially significant activities; 32% have an average level. Reflection as the ability to analyze one's own behavior and assess its social significance was studied using the O. V. Kalashnikova test. In the studied sample, 37% of respondents had a high level of reflection, 63% – on average. During the survey, it was revealed that the work of curators at the Tula State Lev Tolstoy Pedagogical University satisfies students, is considered important and useful. The dynamics of the formation of socially responsible behavior was studied using the methodology «Responsibility before and now». All respondents indicated a subjectively felt increase in indicators of responsibility in their student years. Conclusion. The essence of socially responsible behavior of students is determined, its components are specified, the indicators of which were identified in the diagnostic process; on the basis of an expert survey, the role of curators in the education of socially responsible behavior of students is revealed; the fundamental components of the curatorial support model implemented at the Tula State Lev Tolstoy Pedagogical University are described. The most significant, in the opinion of young people, events and activities of curators, as well as their personal qualities that affect the process of educating socially responsible behavior among students, were identified. The correlation of data on all the methods used allowed us to draw a general conclusion about fairly good results for all the studied indicators of socially responsible behavior of students. Most of the students gave a highly positive assessment of the contribution of the curators in educating them socially responsible behavior.
About the Author
S. V. PazukhinaRussian Federation
Svetlana V. Pazukhina – Doctor of Psychological Sciences, Associate Professor, Head of the Department of Psychology and Pedagogy of the Faculty of Psychology
125 Lenina Ave., Tula, 300026
References
1. Jonas H. The principle of responsibility. Moscow, Airis-Press, 2004, 480 p. (In Russ.).
2. Volkova E. V., Bashkatov S. A., Chernyshova L. V. Review of research on responsibility in Russian and foreign psychology of the XXI century. Vestnik Kostromskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Pedagogika. Psikhologiya. Sotsiokinetika, 2019, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 53 – 59. (In Russ.).
3. Damen T. G. E., Baaren R. B. van, Brass M., Aarts H., Dijksterhuis A. Put your plan into action: the influence of action plans on agency and responsibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2015, vol. 108, no. 6, pp. 850 – 866. DOI: 10.1037/pspa0000024.
4. Koval C. Z., Dellen M. R. van, Fitzsimons G. M., Ranby K. W. The burden of responsibility: interpersonal costs of high self-control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2015, vol. 108, no. 5, pp. 750 – 766. DOI: 10.1037/pspi0000015.
5. Berndsen M., Manstead A. S. R. On the relationship between responsibility and guilt: antecedent appraisal or elaborated appraisal? European Journal of Social Psychology, 2007, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 774 – 792. DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.397.
6. Kenneth S., Boven L. van, Epley N., Wight W. M. The unpacking effect in allocations of responsibility for group tasks. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2005, vol. 41, no. 5, pp. 447 – 457. DOI: 10.1016/j. jesp.2004.08.008.
7. Burnette J. L., Forsyth D. R. «I didn't do it»: responsibility biases in open and closed groups. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 2008, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 210 – 222. DOI: 10.1037/1089 -2699.12.3.210.
8. Zimmermann A., Abrams D., Doosje B., Manstead A. S. R. Causal and moral responsibility: antecedents and consequences of group-based guilt. European Journal of Social Psychology, 2011, vol. 41, no. 7, pp. 825–839. DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.826.
9. Walter N., Tsfati Y. Interactive experience and identification as predictors of attributing responsibility in video games. Journal of Media Psychology: Theories, Methods, and Applications, 2018, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 3 – 15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000168.
10. Tscharaktschiew N., Rudolph U. The who and whom of help giving: an attributional model integrating the help giver and the help recipient. European Journal of Social Psychology, 2016, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 90 – 109. DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.2135.
11. Khanjari L. Investigating the relationship between social responsibility and improving organizational commitment in employees of Tehran Ghavamin Bank with respect to the mediating role of psychological empowerment. Journal of Fundamental and Applied Sciences, 2016, vol. 9, no. 1S, pp. 96 – 121. DOI: 10.4314/jfas.v9i1s.681.
12. Baranovskaya L. A. Formation of the student's social responsibility in the socio-cultural educational space: Dr. ped. sci. diss. abstr. Chita, 2012, 42 p. (In Russ.).
13. Baurova Yu. V. Fundamentals of the formation of social responsibility of a student of a modern university. Izvestiya Saratovskogo universiteta. Novaya seriya. Seriya: Filosofiya. Psihologiya. Pedagogika, 2016, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 338 – 343. (In Russ.).
14. Simonovich N. E. Psychological features of modern youth. Kul»turno-istoricheskaya psikhologiya: ot nauchnoi revolyutsii k preobrazovaniyu sotsial»nykh praktik: materialy XVII Mezhdunar. chtenii pamyati L. S. Vygotskogo (Moskva, 14 – 19 noyab. 2016 g.). Moscow, 2016, vol. 2, pp. 210 – 215. (In Russ.).
15. Dumazedier J. Leisure planning and cultural development. Obrazovanie vzroslykh i dosug v sovremennoi Evrope. Praga, 1966, pp. 51 – 59. (In Russ.).
16. The President of Russia proposed to introduce additional payments for curators of study groups of technical schools and colleges, April 21, 2021. Minprosveshcheniya Rossii: site. URL: https://edu.gov.ru/press/3635/prezident-rossii-predlozhil-vvesti-doplaty-dlya-kuratorov-uchebnyh-grupp-tehnikumov-i-kolledzhey/ (accessed 28.04.2023). (In Russ.).
17. Kalinina Z. N., Pazuhina S. V. Student group curator's book. Tula, Tul. gos. ped. un-t im. L. N. Tolstogo, 2018, 43 p. (In Russ.).
18. Shved I. V. University as a model of civil society. Vestnik Stavropol»skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2008, no. 1, pp. 35 – 38. (In Russ.).
19. Charles D. R. Universities and engagement with cities, regions and local communities. Rebalancing the social and economic. Learning, partnership and place. Leicester, 2005, pp. 143 – 157.
20. Nikitina V. V, Kutsaya A. Yu., Salun S. N. On the problem of curatorship in a modern university. Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya, 2019, no. 2. URL: http://science-education.ru/ru/article/view?id=28666 (accessed 28.04.2023). (In Russ.).
21. Smirnov S. D. Pedagogy and psychology of higher education: from activity to personality. Moscow, Aspekt Press, 1995, 270 p. (In Russ.).
22. Seleznyova E. V. Peculiarities of students' responsible behaviour. Akmeologiya, 2017, no. 1, pp. 18 – 22. (In Russ.).
23. Barkunova O. V., Sedova S. S., Smirnova O. A. Formation of socially responsible behavior of university students. Sovremennye naukoemkie tekhnologii, 2021, no. 5, pp. 124 – 128. (In Russ.).
Supplementary files
For citation: Pazukhina S.V. Education of socially responsible behavior among student youth. Professional education in the modern world. 2023;13(2):386-394. https://doi.org/10.20913/2618-7515-2023-2-20
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.