Social elevators and their perception by students


https://doi.org/10.20913/2618-7515-2023-1-3

Full Text:




Abstract

Introduction. Society is a hierarchical system in which active elements, that is, individuals, are interested in acquiring a higher position. This is especially true for young people who are just determining their life prospects. Social institutions that allow you to move to a higher social position are commonly referred to as «social elevators». The theoretical basis of this study is the doctrine of systemic inversions. System inversion is a form of relations in hierarchical systems, in which some lower element acquires a dominant value in this system, but does not leave its initially subordinate position. Inversion in a hierarchical system occurs due to the fact that several organizational principles operate simultaneously in such a system, each of which determines the hierarchical position of subordinate elements. Systemic inversion occurs when the action of one organizational principle contradicts the action of another such principle (or several ones). The action of one or another social elevator makes it possible for the subject to change his social status in relation to any organizational principle in the social hierarchy. Thus, the action of the social elevator can both create inversions in the social system and contribute to their resolution.
Purpose setting. In this study, the university students' ideas about the future use of social elevators were studied. The study was of a pilot nature.
Methodology and methods of the study. The study used a specially designed questionnaire. A total of 290 respondents (undergraduate students of various fields of study) were interviewed.
Results. Data were obtained on which social elevators students consider to be the most important for themselves. The most significant are such social elevators as business, professional career in employment, marriage, as well as creative self-realization. Further education, as a social elevator, is reliably more often mentioned by girls than boys.
Conclusions. The study of the social elevators preferred by students should be continued in the future; this information is necessary for the formation of educational and social policy.


About the Authors

D. A. Sevostyanov
Novosibirsk State Medical University
Russian Federation

Dmitry A. Sevostyanov – Doctor of Philosophical Sciences, Associate Professor of the Department of Pedagogy and Psychology

52 Krasny Ave., Novosibirsk, 630 091



A. R. Gainanova
Siberian Transport University
Russian Federation

Alisa R. Gainanova – Candidate of Psychological Sciences, Associate Professor of the Department «Vocational Training, Pedagogy and Psychology»

191 Dusi Kovalchuk Str., Novosibirsk, 630 049



Yu. V. Pechin
Novosibirsk State Agrarian University
Russian Federation

Yuri V. Pechin – Candidate of Psychological Sciences, Associate Professor of the Department of State and Municipal Administration

160 Dobrolyubova Str., Novosibirsk, 630 039



References

1. Sorokin P. A. Man. Civilization. Society. Moscow, Politizdat, 1992, 542 p. (In Russ.).

2. Kosinov S. S. The main channels of social mobility of Russian youth in modern conditions. Bulletin of the Krasnodar University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, 2012, no. 4, pp. 91 – 97. (In Russ.).

3. Volkov Yu. G. New social elevators in the regional space. Reforming Russia, 2020, no. 18, pp. 131 – 159. (In Russ.).

4. Mironova S. P. Social elevator: a look through the prism of mass media. Socio-professional mobility in the XXI century. Yekaterinburg, 2015, pp. 74 – 81. (In Russ.).

5. Romanova K. S. Social elevators as a means of social mobility. Discourse – P, 2015, no. 2, pp. 30 – 34. (In Russ.).

6. Cherkess K. A. The role of youth non-profit organizations in the formation and development of social elevators in modern Russia. Society: Sociology, Psychology, Pedagogy, 2020, no. 11, pp. 45 – 50. (In Russ.).

7. Shpektorenko I. V. Social elevators in the structure of an individual»s social mobility. Administrative Consulting, 2013, no. 6, pp. 93 – 103. (In Russ.).

8. Mednikov A. B. Tapunov Yu. N., Lyzar O. G. Sport as a social elevator: institutional, mass media and existential factors. Society and Law, 2021, no. 1, pp. 154 – 158. (In Russ.).

9. Efimova O. Yu. Social mobility of young people from poor families: experience of pilot research. Knowledge. Understanding. Skill, 2013, no. 4, pp.270 – 273. (In Russ.).

10. Kosaretsky S. G., Pinskaya M. A., Grunicheva I. G. Problems of poverty and access to education. Assessment of the situation in Russia and international experience. Universe of Russia. Sociology. Ethnology, 2014, no. 2, pp.133 – 153. (In Russ.).

11. Shkaratan O. I. Sociology of inequality. Theory and reality. Moscow, Higher School of Economics Publ., 2012, 526 p. (In Russ.).

12. Sevostyanov D. A. Inversions in social hierarchies. Novosibirsk, Zolotoj kolos, 2020, 273 p. (In Russ.).

13. Lenski G. Status crystallization: nonvertical measurement of social status. Sociological Journal, 2003, no. 4, pp. 126 – 140. (In Russ.).

14. Petkov V. A., Filonenko V. A. Mechanisms of functioning of social elevators in the educational space of the university. Theory and Practice of Social Development, 2014, no. 1, pp. 55 – 57. (In Russ.).

15. Selivanova O. A. The problem of deformation of social elevators in the modern educational sphere. Bulletin of the Tyumen State University. Socio-Economic and Legal Studies, 2012, no. 9, pp. 33 – 40. (In Russ.).

16. Chernykh S. I. Social elevators in education: problems and solutions. Higher Education in Russia, 2018, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 88 – 95. (In Russ.).

17. Husén T. Higher education and social stratification: an international comparative study. Paris, Intern. Inst. for Educational Planning, 1987, 75 p.

18. Rakhmatullina L. I., Babenko K. Yu. The problem of brain drain in Russia. Eurasian Union of Scientists, 2015, no. 5 – 2, pp. 50 – 51. (In Russ.).

19. Borusyak L. F. Young intellectuals: why do they leave Russia and then decide to return? Bulletin of Public Opinion. Data. Analysis. Discussions, 2020, no. 1/2, pp. 191 – 205. (In Russ.).

20. Artamonova E. V., Artamonov V. A. Problems of education in the post-industrial era. Social Novelties and Social Sciences, 2021, no. 1, pp. 65 – 79. (In Russ.).


Supplementary files

For citation: Sevostyanov D.A., Gainanova A.R., Pechin Y.V. Social elevators and their perception by students. Professional education in the modern world. 2023;13(1):18-27. https://doi.org/10.20913/2618-7515-2023-1-3

Views: 309

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2224-1841 (Print)