.png)
.png)
Email this article 
Socio-philosophical cognition of the phenomenon of uncertainty and forecasting in education
https://doi.org/10.20913/2618-7515-2021-4-3
Abstract
The principle of uncertainty operates in the perspective of discussing the modern Russian education modernization, it arises in the circumstances of unclear public priorities, goals, values. At the educational practice viewpoint, the holistic methodology absence for the philosophical understanding of certainty and uncertainty of ontological, epistemological, epistemological, axiological research programs, is reflected in both satisfying human cognitive needs and forecasting in education. Developing a methodological formalization of concepts «certainty», «uncertainty», «ontological uncertainty» (non-articulation of properties and behavior of the system or its individual element), «epistemological uncertainty» (in techniques of cognition, forming a worldview, implementing innovations, as well as interpreting the quality of education from the standpoint market laws), «epistemological uncertainty» (parametric, random, ambiguous and uncertainty of interaction) are associated with a critical discussion of the essential signs of uncertainty in society and education, which are becoming the research subject of the education philosophy. A survey of philosophers’ opinions regarding the education models of the future pointed to the critically-oriented nature of already existing prototypes and the development of their scenarios. The need to determine the theoretical status of «uncertainty in education» is closely related to understanding a person's place in the world, agreeing in the public consciousness of a consistent understanding of the axiological categories: «value of education» and «education as a value» and their new interpretation based on the articulation of «axiological certainty» as new ecosystems of values and principles of their functioning in the education of the future. Understanding the changes in the ontological, epistemological and axiological foundations of Russian education is private explications of socio-philosophical subjectivism to a certain extent. Modern concepts discussing the axiological reversal in educational practices concentrate around the problem of axiological certainty, namely: the preservation of civilization and the hierarchical nature of educational goals and values as an important component of effective education management.
About the Authors
I. V. YakovlevaRussian Federation
Irina V. Yakovleva – Candidate of Philosophy, Associate Professor, Researcher, Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Education
28, Vilyuiskaya Str., Novosibirsk, 630126
T. S. Kosenko
Russian Federation
Tatyana S. Kosenko – Candidate of Philosophy, Associate Professor, Deputy Head, Scientific Center of the Russian Academy of Education; Professor, Department of Humanities and Social Sciences
28, Vilyuiskaya Str., Novosibirsk, 630126
6/2, Klyuch-Kamyshenskoe plateau, Novosibirsk, 630114
References
1. Yaspers K. The origins of history and its meaning. The meaning and purpose of history. Moscow, Politizdat, 1991, 288 p. (In Russ.).
2. Vizir P. I., Ursul A.D. Dialectics of certainty and uncertainty. Chisinau, Shtiintsa, 1976, 124 р. (In Russ.).
3. Grechanova V.A. Uncertainty and inconsistency in the concept of determinism / scientific. Leningrad, Leningrad Univ. Publ., 1990, 134 p. (In Russ.).
4. Frolova M.I. The world of a man: uncertainty as a challenge (XVII Frolov readings). Problems of philosophy, 2018, no. 4, рр. 187–190. (In Russ.).
5. Pigalev A.I. On some philosophical aspects of modern concepts of removing uncertainty. World of psychology, 2017, no. 3, рр. 129–140. (In Russ.).
6. Veselkova V. S. Forecasting in conditions of uncertainty. XXXIV Ogarevskie readings: proc. of sci. conf. Saransk, 2006, pt. 1, рр. 14–16. (In Russ.).
7. Zbrishchak S.G., Zvyagin L.S. Uncertainty in problems of modeling and control of complex, weakly formalized multicomponent systems. International Conference on Soft Computing and Measurements. Saint Petersburg, 2020, vol. 1, рр. 15–19. (In Russ.).
8. Zubrikhina A.A. Actualization of the problem of uncertainty: modern challenges and strategies of behavior. New challenges of uncertainty: proc. of All-Russ. sci.-pract. conf. Novosibirsk, 2020, pp. 38–40. (In Russ.).
9. Vikhorev S.A. Value orientations of students as a factor of moral choice in the context of tolerance to uncertainty. Philosophy of Education, 2010, no. 3, рр. 232–236. (In Russ.).
10. Efremova I. N., Belkova T.M. Ways and means of expressing the category of certainty/uncertainty in Russian and French. Concept, 2017, vol. 28, pp. 27–30. (In Russ.).
11. Bogdanova E.V. Categories «certainty»and «uncertainty»as elements of contractual regulation of social relations. Legislation and Economics, 2012, no. 4, рр. 21–28. (In Russ.).
12. Nazarova T.S. General secondary education in conditions of uncertainty. Bulletin of Moscow University. Ser. 20. Teacher education, 2013, no. 4, рр. 30–49. (In Russ.).
13. Begalinova K. K., Kosenko T.S., Nalivaiko N.V. The principle of uncertainty in education as a socio-philosophical problem. Philosophy of education, 2016, no. 2, рр. 122–128. (In Russ.).
14. Kodzhaspirova G.M. The uncertainty factor in the process of teacher training. Human capital, 2021, no. 1, рр. 131–140. (In Russ.).
15. Novosadov S.A. Education of the third millennium: changing the logic of social behavior. Philosophy of education, 2018, no. 1, рр. 79–106. (In Russ.).
16. Kosenko T.S., Nalivaiko N.V., Ligostaev A. G., Yakovleva I.V. Changing the role of education in the XXI century (webinar transcript). Philosophy of education, 2018, no. 3, рр. 199–220. (In Russ.).
17. The main reasons that negatively affect the efficiency of the functioning of the domestic education system and inhibit the historical relevance of its progressive development: webinar transcript. Philosophy of education, 2016, no. 4, рр. 168–176. (In Russ.).
18. Kalnei M.S. On the methodology of social forecasting. Philosophy of education, 2008, no. 2, рр. 62–69. (In Russ.).
19. Dudina M. N. Education in conditions of uncertainty: problems of anthropological proportionality. Philosophy of education, 2019, no. 2, рр. 20–35. (In Russ.).
20. Novosadov S.A. Formation of a new methodology of education by way of getting out of the existing technogenic and socio-cultural paradigm. Philosophy of education, 2020, no. 1, рр. 5–24. (In Russ.).
21. Kudryashova E.V., Sorokin S. E. «Entrepreneurial University»as a model of transformation of educational organizations: theoretical approaches and Russian experience. Philosophy of education, 2010, no. 4, pp. 5–19. (In Russ.).
22. Abramova M.A. Model of a unified educational space and (or) preservation of the national education system? Philosophy of education, 2020, no. 1, рр. 25–37. (In Russ.).
23. Tarasova O.I. Education: between the past and the future. Philosophy of education, 2020, no. 4, pp. 17–31. (In Russ.).
24. Yakovleva I.V. Axiology of education as an emerging system: social and philosophical reflection. Philosophy of education, 2020, no. 12, pp. 31–47. (In Russ.).
Supplementary files
For citation: Yakovleva I.V., Kosenko T.S. Socio-philosophical cognition of the phenomenon of uncertainty and forecasting in education. Professional education in the modern world. 2021;11(4):19-27. https://doi.org/10.20913/2618-7515-2021-4-3
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
