.png)
.png)
Email this article 
On the problem of metacognitive regulators of the university student viability
https://doi.org/10.20913/2618-7515-2020-4-19
Abstract
The article is devoted to the analysis of the phenomenon of vitality and its metacognitive regulators, in particular, cognitive styles. The vitality is considered as a multi-causal phenomenon that integrates various cognitive, emotional and personal aspects. The analysis made it possible to identify and describe the components and factors of viability using various methodological approaches: systemic, system-network, inte grative, structural ones. The study compares the concepts of «vitality and «hardiness». The base of the empirical study are the model of viability by E. A. Rylskaya, model of hardiness by S. Maddy, and typology of cognitive styles by A. Harrison -R. Bramson. The author identifies the most and least pronounced cognitive styles, as well as their relationship with the parameters of vitality and hardiness based on research on a student sample. So, the most pronounced styles are «analyst» and «realist» styles, and the least pronounced – «synthesizer» style. Correlations of the «idealist» and «pragmatist» styles with the parameters of vitality and hardiness are grouped into opposite pleiads. The study reveals that the ability to plan, predict, reflexive analysis, acting as its metacognitive regulators, play the greatest role in the vitality forming. At the same time, a pronounced pragmatic orientation in thinking leads to the vitality decrease.
About the Author
A. V. TarakanovRussian Federation
Anton V. Tarakanov – Candidate of Psychological Sciences, Associate Professor, Head of the Department of Psychology and Pedagogy
20 K. Marx Ave., Novosibirsk, 630073, Russian Federation
References
1. Makhnach A. V., Dikaya L. G. Interdisciplinary and intersystem studies of human viability: state and prospects. Human viability: individual, professional and social aspects [ed. A. V. Makhnach, L. G. Dikaya]. Moscow, 2016, pp. 7–28. (In Russ.)
2. Ananiev B. G. Man as a subject of knowledge. Leningrad, Leningrad Univ. Publi. House, 1968, 343 p. (In Russ.)
3. Masten A. S. Ordinary magic: Resilience in development. New York, Guilford Press, 2014, 370 p.
4. Zelenkova T. V. On the network paradigm in psychology. Methodology and History of Psychology, 2007, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 18–28. (In Russ.)
5. Makhnach A. V. Viability of man and family: social and psychological paradigm. Moscow, Inst. of Psychology RAS, 2016, 459 p. (In Russ.)
6. Rylskaya E. A. Viability as the potential of the integrity of a person and his existence: an integrative approach. Human vitality: individual, professional and social aspects. Moscow, 2016, pp. 111–126. (In Russ.)
7. Laktionova A. I. Viability as the potential of the integrity of a person and his being: an integrative approach. Human vitality: individual, professional and social aspects. Moscow, 2016, pp. 88–110. (In Russ.)
8. Rylskaya E. A. On the problem of a person psychological vitality: a conceptual model and empirical experience. Psychology. Journal of the Higher School of Economics, 2011, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 9–38. (In Russ.).
9. Rylskaya E. A. Human vitality: concept and conceptual foundations of research. Siberian Psychological Journal, 2009, no. 31, pp. 6–12. (In Russ.).
10. Maddi S., Khoshaba D. Hardiness and mental health. Journal of Personality Assessment, 1994, vol. 63, no. 2, pp. 265–274.
11. Jung K. G. Psychological types. Moscow, Univ. book, AST, 1998, 720 p. (In Russ.)
12. Sobchik L. N. Introduction to the psychology of individuality. Moscow, Inst. of Appl. Psychology, 1997. 469 p. (In Russ.)
13. Holodnaya M. A. Cognitive styles. On the nature of the individual mind. 2nd ed. Saint Petersburg, Peter, 2004, 384 p. (In Russ.)
14. Sternberg R. J. Mental self-government: a theory of intellectual styles and their development. Human Development, 1998, vol. 31, pp. 197–221.
15. Karpov A. V. Metasystemic organization of level structures of the psyche. Moscow, Inst, of Psychology RAS, 2004, 504 p. (In Russ.)
16. Karpov A. V. On the concept of metacognitive abilities of a person. Psychology of abilities and giftedness: proc. of the All-Russ. sci.‑pract. conf. (Nov. 21–22, 2019). Yaroslavl, 2019, pp. 40–44. (In Russ.)
17. Harrison A. F., Bramson R. M. The art of thinking: strategies for asking questions, making decisions, and solving problems. New York, Berkley Books, 1984, 208 p.
18. Liedtke J., Fromhage L. Modelling the evolution of cognitive styles. Evolutionary Biology, 2019, vol. 19, art. 234, pp. 1–10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12 862‑019‑1565‑2.
19. Lopez O., Kamargo A. Cognitive style and academic achievement. Educación y Educadores, 2011, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 67–82.
20. Achina A. V. Analysis of the relationship between the styles of thinking and the parameters of the solution of psychodiagnostic tasks among student psychologists and practicing psychologists. Russian Psychological Journal, 2012, no. 3, pp. 65–71. (In Russ.)
21. Chiksentmikhaii M. Stream: the psychology of optimal experience. 3rd ed. Moscow, Smysl, 2013, 461 p. (In Russ.)
22. Leontyev D. A., Rasskazova E. I. Test of hardiness. Moscow, Smysl, 2006, 63 p. (In Russ.)
Supplementary files
For citation: Tarakanov A.V. On the problem of metacognitive regulators of the university student viability. Professional education in the modern world. 2020;10(4):4359-4368. https://doi.org/10.20913/2618-7515-2020-4-19
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
