The philosophy of contemporary education: the fundamental nature or competence of the digital space

A. A. Gladyshev; A. A. Gladysheva

doi:10.15372/PEMW20200114

The philosophy of contemporary education: the fundamental nature or competence of the digital space

A. A. Gladyshev, A. A. Gladysheva

https://doi.org/10.15372/PEMW20200114

Full Text:

Abstract

The aim of the article is to study the conceptual foundations of the competence approach, the results of its spreading in the Russian educational space and its correlation with the digital space. In the context of the goal, the author analyzes the content of the competence-based education system, the distinctive features of its formation in different countries, the specifics of its implementation in the Russian educational space. We consider the problems of the transition period and difficulties associated with the inability to implement some provisions of the Bologna process due to differences in the organizational and economic basis of universities. We have indicated the degree of readiness of universities to fulfill the requirements of the Federal state educational standard of higher education for the implementation of individual educational trajectory of students in full. We present a number of conditions for the successful implementation of individual educational trajectory in a university. The paper also discusses the main types of digital learning, its features; focuses on the existence of several approaches to the introduction of computer games and digital technologies in the educational process, their efficiency and effectiveness. We noted the possibility of using digital platforms in the educational process, defined the practice-oriented nature of digital technologies, reasoned their use for fundamental learning. The methodological basis of the study was the philosophical position on continuity. In this case, the expected continuity of education systems, forms, means, methods and learning outcomes. In the process of work, general scientific methods were used: analysis, synthesis, induction, deduction.

Keywords

fundamental education, competence, digital educational space, digital learning, principle of foundation, virtual and augmented reality, modular educational programs, individual educational trajectory,

About the Authors

A. A. Gladyshev

Novosibirsk State Agrarian University
Russian Federation

Аlexandr А. Gladyshev – senior lecturer Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution

160, Dobrolyubova str., Novosibirsk, 630039

A. A. Gladysheva

Novosibirsk State Agrarian University
Russian Federation

Аnna А., Gladysheva – Phd Pedagogical science, associate professor, head of department Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution

160, Dobrolyubova str., Novosibirsk, 630 039

References

1. Barney J.A. Organizational Culture: Can It Be A Source of Sustained Competitive Advantage?. Academy of Management Journal, 1986, vol. 11 (3), pp. 656–665.

2. Barney J.A. Types of Competition and the Theory of Strategy: Toward an Integrative Framework. Academy of Management Review, 1986, no. 11 (4), pp. 791–800.

3. Arnold R. Schlusselqualifikationen – Ziel einer ganzheitlichen Berufsbildung. In: Kolner Zeitschrift fur, Wirtschaft und Pеdagogik. 7. Jg., 1992. Heft 13, pp. 65–88.

4. Achtenhagen F. John E.G. Mehrdimensionale Lehr-Lern-Arrangements – Innovationen in der kaufmannischen Aus- und Weiterbildung. (Hrsg.): Mehrdimensionale Lehr-Lern Arrangements. Innovationen in der kaufmannischen Aus- und Weiterbildung. 1992, pp. 3–11.

5. Cappelli P., Crocker-Hefter A. Distinctive human resources are firms»core competencies. Organizational Dynamics. Winter. 1996, pp. 7–22.

6. Delamare le Deist F., Winterton J. What is competence? Human resource development international, 2005, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 27–46.

7. Bowskill N., Foster J., Lally V., McConnell D. Networked professional development: Issues and strategies in current practice. The International Journal for Academic Development, 2000, vol. 5 (2), pp. 93–106.

8. Boyatzis R. the Competent Manager. Model of effective work. trans. with English. Moscow, HIPPO Publ., 2008, 352 p.

9. Barney J.A. Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management, 1991, no. 17 (1), pp. 99–120.

10. Cazal D., DietrichA. Compeґtences et savoirs: quels concepts pour quelles instumentations. Geґrer les Compeґtences: des Instruments aux Processus. A. Klarsfeld and E. Oiry (Eds). Paris: Vuibert. 2003, pp. 241–262.

11. Spitzer R.D. TQM: The Only Source of Sustainable Competitive Advantage. Quality Progress. 1993, pp. 59–64.

12. Spencer L.M. Jr., Spencer S.M. Competence at work: models for superior performance. J. Wiley & Sons.Inc. New York, 1993.

13. Synder A.V., Ebeling Jr.H. W. Targeting A. Company»s Real Core Competencies. Journal of Business Strategy, 1992, pp. 26–32.

14. Mansfield R. Building competency models: Approach for HR professionals, Human Resource Management. Spring, 1996, vol. 35, Namber I, pp. 7–18.

15. Bjornavold J. Making Learning Visible. Identification, Assessment and recognition of Non-form, al Learning in Europe. CEDEFOP. Luxemburg: EUR-Op. 2000, 325 p.

16. Le Boterf G. Construire les competences individuelles et collectives. Paris: Editions d»organisation, 2010.

17. Jacqueline M. de Chabert. A model for the development and implementation of core competencies in restaurant companies for superior financial performance. Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and StateUniversity in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy In Hospitality and Tourism Management. Available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10919/30 765

18. UK Qualifications and Credit Framework. OCA, 2008.

19. Prahalad С.К., Hamel G. Competing for the Future. Harvard Business Review.1994, 10 p.

20. Cheetham G., Chivers G. The reflective (and competent) practitioner: A model of professional competence which seeks to harmonise the reflective practitioner and competence-based approaches. Journal of European Industrial Training, 1998, vol. 22, no. 7, pp. 267–276.

21. Dohmen G. Weiterbildungsinstitutionen, Medien, Lernumwelten: Rahmenbedingungen und Entwicklungshilfen für das selbstgesteuerte Lernen. – Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung, 1999.

22. Klemp G.O. The Assessment of Occupational Competence. Washington. DC.: Report to the National Institute of Education,1980.

23. Le Boterf G. De la competence, essai sur un attracteur etrange. Paris: Les editions d»organisation, 1994.

24. Flothow K. Förderung von Handlungskompetenzen in der beruflichen Erstausbildung durch Lern – und Arbeitstechniken. Bergisch Gladbach, 1992.

25. ` Martynyuk O.I. et al. Experience of formation of competence model of the graduate of pedagogical high school as standards of quality and base of an assessment of results of education (on the example of physical and mathematical faculty) / pod nauch. ed. N.A. Selezneva, I.N. Medvedeva. Qualimetry in education: methodology, methodology, practice: Proceedings of the XI Symposium-Moscow: Research center for quality problems of training, 2006. 48 p.

26. Zhuk O.L. Pedagogical preparation of students: competence approach. Minsk: national Institute of higher education, 2009. 336 p.

27. Zhuk O.L. Competence approach in pedagogical training of students of classical University. Vesnik BDU, Ser. 4, 2009, no. 1, pp. 95–104.

28. Makarov A.V. Competence model of social and humanitarian training of University graduates. Vysh. SHK, 2004, no. 1, pp. 16–12.

29. Ryabov L.Р. comparative studies of higher education systems: methodol. aspect. Moscow, 2002, 271 p.

30. Subetto A.I. Quality management System in the University (model): materials X SIMP. «Qualimetry in education: methodology and practice». Edited by N.A. Selezneva, A.I. Subetto. Research. center for quality problems of training. Moscow, 2002, 25 p.

31. Kletneva A.A., Davydova S.A., Gladyshev A.A. Creation of individual educational trajectories of bachelors of physical culture. Strategy of harmonious development of the personality in the concept of the International children»s games «Sport, art, intelligence». Novosibirsk, Novosibirsk, State Acad. waters». Transport Publ., 2013, pp. 224–227.

32. Plyukhina S.V. the Content of social and professional competence as a holistic quality of the graduate and the result of education. Secondary vocational education, 2011, no. 11, pp. 26–28.

33. Gladyshev A.A. Formation of an individual educational trajectory of students of physical culture and sports profile on the basis of a competence approach (for specialization in the field of fitness). Disserta tion submitted to for the degree of candidate of pedagogy 13.00.08/ A.A. Gladyshev. – Nizhnevartovsk, 2016. – 217 p. [https://esu.citis.ru; (date of issue: 02.02.2020)]

34. Kanthan R., Senger J. The impact of specially designed digital computer games-based learning in undergraduate pathology and medical education. Education in Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, 2011, vol. 135, pp. 135–142.

35. Vandercruysse S., Vandewaetere M., Cornillie F., Clarebout G. Competition and students» perceptions in a game-based language learning environment. Educational Technology Research and Development, 2013, vol. 61 (6), pp. 927–950. DOI: 10.1007/s11 423 013 9314 5

36. Rondon S., Chiarion S., Furquim de Andrade C. Computer game-based and traditional learning method: A comparison regarding student»s knowledge retention. BMC Medical Education, 2013, vol. 13 (30), pp. 1–8. DOI: 10.1186/1472 6920 13 30

37. Reinders H., Wattana S. Affect and willingness to communicate in digital game-based learning. The Journal of EUROCALL, 2015, vol. 27 (1), pp. 38–57.

38. Boeker M., Andel P., Vach W., Frankenschmidt A. Game-based e-learning is more effective than a conventional instructional method: A randomized controlled trial with third-year medical students. PloSOne, 2013, vol. 8 (12). DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0082 328.

39. Herro D., Clark R. An academic home for play: Games as unifying influences in higher education. On the Horizon, 2016, vol. 24 (1), pp. 17–28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/ OTH-08 2015 0060

40. Turner P.E., Johnston E., Kebritchi M., Evans S., Heflich D.A. Influence of online computer games on the academic achievement of nontraditional undergraduate students. Cogent Education, 2018, vol. 5, pp. 1437671. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2 331186X.2018.1437671

41. Dadheech A. Available at: https://theknowledgereview.com/importance-game-based-learning-modern-education/

42. Antonaci А., Klemke R., Specht M. The Effects of Gamification in Online Learning Environments: A Systematic Literature Review. Informatics, 2019, vol. 6, pp. 32. DOI: 10.3390/informatics6030 032.

43. Smirnov E.I., Belkina V.N., Tikhomirov A.S., Troshina T.L. Funding in determining the content of mathematical education of the future teacher. Yaroslavl pedagogical Bulletin, 2013, no. 3, vol. II, pp. 134–140.

Supplementary files

For citation: Gladyshev A.A., Gladysheva A.A. The philosophy of contemporary education: the fundamental nature or competence of the digital space. Professional education in the modern world. 2020;10(1):3508-3519. https://doi.org/10.15372/PEMW20200114

Refbacks

There are currently no refbacks.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

ISSN 2224-1841 (Print)

Username
Password