Online-education: reontologisation or deontologisation?


https://doi.org/10.15372/PEMW20200105

Full Text:




Abstract

The problematic goal of the article is to identify the direction of the vector of development of modern educational systems in the digital age towards reontologization or deontologization of education. Purposeful digitalization and commodification of education, which contribute to the implementation of the provisions of transhumanist ethics, entail the transformation of ideas about the nature of education, comparable in scale to the introduction of mass education in the 20th century. New ways of constructing ontologies of education are emerging, aimed at finding the foundations of this phenomenon. For centuries, education has been understood as the process of transmitting knowledge, values, norms of behavior, and ways of doing from person to person, involvement in local and international sociocultural and professional practices adopted in a particular human community. Currently, we are talking about entrusting this mission to artificial intelligence and exclusively personalized, but, in fact, dehumanized computer programs, mobile applications and online courses. Thus, the policy of the next re-ontologization of education as a sociocultural phenomenon is being carried out, in which certain researchers see deontologization, i.e. undermining the foundations in the social structure of education as a sociocultural phenomenon and mode of being. The question arises as to whether the aforementioned trends are so destructive in their consequences, or whether it is a question of changing individual ontologemes (i.e., the provisions of the ontology of education). The author of the article identifies the directions of re-ontologization of education in the 21st century and conducts a socio-philosophical examination of the onto-axiology of online education. The conclusion is drawn that online education has both a positive re-ontologizing and destructively deontologizing potential together with other transforming ontologemes of modern education. Among the fundamental essential foundations of education, the loss of which will mean the end for the sociocultural phenomenon and the birth of a new practice, personal interaction of participants in the educational process and the balance of integration and differentiation in education are singled out.

About the Author

S. Yu. Polyankina
Novosibirsk State Technical University
Russian Federation

Sophia Yu. Polyankina – postgraduate student, Senior Lecturer of the Department of Philosophy of the Faculty of Humanities 

20, K. Marks Ave., 630 073



References

1. Passport of the priority project «Modern Digital Educational Environment in the Russian Federation». Available at: http://government.ru/media/files/8SiLmMBgjAN89vZbUUtmuF5lZYfTvOAG.pdf. (accessed: 10.30.19).

2. «Digital School» will change the role of educators in educational organizations. Available at: https:// edu.gov.ru/press/35/cifrovaya-shkola-izmenit-rol-pedagogov-v-obrazovatelnyh-organizaciyah/(accessed: 10.30.19).

3. Incheon Declaration and Framework for the Implementation of the Sustainable Development Goal. Available at: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0 000245656_rus. (accessed: 10.31.19).

4. Chernykh S.I. Educational space in the conditions of informatization of society. Novosibirsk, NSAU Publ., 2011, 254 p.

5. Aristotle. Metaphysics. Moscow, Eksmo Publ., 2019, 480 p.

6. Krasikov V.I. Ontology. Questions of philosophy, 2013, no. 9, pp. 43–51.

7. Krasikov V.I. Construction of ontologies. Efmerids Ego in time and other essays. Moscow, Aquarius Publ., 2007, 304 p.

8. Datsyuk S. Ontologization. Kiev, 2009, 417 p. Available at: http://www.uis.kiev.ua/xyz/o.htm. (accessed: 10.31.19).

9. Karpov A.O. Ontologization, «ontologization» and education. Problems of Philosophy, 2013, no. 9, pp. 31–42.

10. Altbach P.G. Global Perspectives on Higher Education. Baltimore, JHU Press Publ., 2016, 332 p.

11. BowenW. Higher Education in the Digital Age. Princeton NJ, Princeton University Press Publ., 2013, 232 p.

12. Bryzgalina E.V. Education management as a complex social institution: philosophical problems. Bulletin of TSU. Philosophy Series. Sociology. Political science, 2012, no. 4 (20), vol. 1, pp. 12–19.

13. Bryzgalina E.V., Smirnova A.A. Russian education: from local practices to global trends (notes on the forum «Education of Russia / EDU Russia). Problems of modern education, 2017, no. 3, pp. 126–136.

14. Pavlyutkin I.V. Market as a metaphor: a critical analysis of the marketing of education. Materials of the HSE seminar. Available at: https://www.hse.ru/data/271/107/1225/2009 02 24.doc. (accessed: 10.30.19).

15. Karpov A.O. Commodification of education in the perspective of its goals, ontology and logic of the cultural movement. Questions of Philosophy, 2012, no. 10, pp. 85–96.

16. Karpov A.O. «Tovarization» of education against the knowledge society. Bulletin of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 2014, vol. 84, no. 5, pp. 434–440.

17. Sevostyanov D.A., Gaynanova A.N. The values of education: inversion of meanings. Higher education in Russia, 2014, no. 2, pp. 43–48.

18. Pichugina V.K., Bezrogov V.G. Education and self-care in the era of metamodern. Vestnik PSTGU. Series 4: Pedagogy. Psychology, 2015, no. 3 (38), pp. 116–128.

19. Ahmed W. The Polymath. Unlocking the Power of Human Versatility. Chichester: Wiley, 2018, 228 p.

20. The Flipped Classroom. Practices in Higher Education / ed. by C. Reidsema, L. Kavanagh, R. Hadgraft, N. Smith. Singapore, Springer Publ., 2017, 307 p.

21. Peters M.A. The university in the epoch of digital reason. Fast knowledge in the circuits of cybernetic capitalism. Universities in the time of flux: An exploration of time and temporality in university life. London, Routledge Publ., 2014, pp. 9–31.

22. Smolin O.N. The contours of the new educational policy of Russia. Economics and Management, 2011, no. 11 (73), pp. 41–43.

23. Keehr G., Anderson M., Boyles D. Neoliberalism, Technology, and the University: Max Weber»s Concept of Rationalization as a Critique of Online Classes in Higher Education. Contemporary Philosophical Proposals for the University. Cham, Palgrave Macmillan Publ., 2018, pp. 47–66.

24. Artificial Intelligence in Education: Supporting Learning through Intelligeny and Socially Informed Technology. ed. by Ch. K. Looi, G. McCalla, B. Bredeweg, J. Breuker. Amsterdam, IOS Press Publ., 2005, 1012 p.

25. Artificial Intelligence in Education. 19th International Conference, AIED 2018 London, UK, June 27– 30, 2018 Proceedings, Part II. ed. by C. Penstein Rose, R. Martinez-Maldonado, H.U. Hoppe, R. Luckin, M. Mavrikis, K. Porayska-Pomsta, B. McLaren, B. du Boulay. Cham, Springer Publ., 2018, 580 p.

26. Aoun J.E. Robot-Proof. Higher Education in the Age of Artificial Intelligence. Cambridge, The MIT Press Publ., 2017, 187 p.

27. Polyankina S.Yu. The problem field of social integration and differentiation in the system of domestic education = The problem field of social integration and differentiation in the system of domestic education. Philosophy of Education, 2017, no. 3, pp. 17–27.

28. Reichenbach R. Beyond sovereignty: The twofold subversion of Bildung. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 2003, no. 35 (2), pp. 201–209.

29. Bowles N. The Digital Gap between Rich and Poor Kids Is Not What We Expected. Available at: https:// www.nytimes.com/2018/10/26/style/digital-divide-screens-schools.html (accessed: 12.05.19).

30. Ritzer G. The McDonaldization of Society. London, Pine Forge Press Publ., 2000, 278 p.


Supplementary files

For citation: Polyankina S.Y. Online-education: reontologisation or deontologisation? Professional education in the modern world. 2020;10(1):3428-3437. https://doi.org/10.15372/PEMW20200105

Views: 542

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2224-1841 (Print)