.png)
.png)
Email this article 
Role factors as a pedagogical innovation of interpersonal interaction of cadets
https://doi.org/10.15372/PEMW20190315
Abstract
The article analyzes the problem of the role structure of cadets, the relevance of which is due to the reforms in the system of higher military education, the complexity of training programs and the increasing requirements for the training of unit commanders. It is noted that in the process of interpersonal interaction in the military team, it is assumed that certain roles will be performed. A new method for diagnosing cadets’ role models as participants in the pedagogical process is proposed, using the innovative Kaleidoscope technique, which includes 10 main roles related to the meso-level. The differentiation of roles according to three criteria is considered: activity-passivity, individualism-sociality and spontaneity-traditionalism. The purpose of the article is the disclosure of the features of the role structure of cadets as subjects of the pedagogical process in the context of interpersonal interaction. A three-factor structure was obtained, explaining more than 67.36 % of the total variability, consisting of the moral and emotional aspect of the role-playing behavior of a serviceman in professional activities, role-playing professionally significant qualities of the defender of the fatherland and the expressive-creative potential in implementing role-playing behavior in the pedagogical process. It is determined that the selected role factors reflect a contradictory unity and include, on the one hand, the role of subordination to the standards and regulations of the military community, and on the other hand, the roles that fulfill the expectations of the homeland defender, the winner, the hero, and the role of leader. It is concluded that the consideration of role factors acting at the personality level as content-informational education introduces new changes in the interaction of participants in the pedagogical process at a military university. In addition, it is noted that the role-based interactions implement the conditions for reprogramming the role profile of the participants in the pedagogical interaction, which contributes to the exit from the individual space into the meta-space.
About the Authors
S. B. PerevozkinRussian Federation
Sergey B. Perevozkin – Candidate of Psychological Sciences, Associate professor in Department of General Psychology and History of Psychology, Viluiskaya Street, House 28, 630126, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation
Yu. M. Perevozkina
Russian Federation
Yulia M. Perevozkina – Candidate of Psychological Sciences, Assistant Professor, Head of Division of Practical and Special Psychology of Psychological Department, Viluiskaya Street, House 28, 630126, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation
References
1. Mead G. H. The Social Self. Psychiatry. Interpersonal and Biological Processes,1978, no. 2 (41), pp. 178–182. DOI: 10.1080/00332747.1978.11023971
2. Bern E. The Games People Play: The Psychology of Human Relationships; People who play games: Psychology of human destiny. Moscow, Fair Press Publ., 2000, 480 p. (In Russ)
3. Kelly G., Thibault J. Interpersonal Relations. Theory of interdependence = Modern foreign social psychology. Texts. Moscow, Moscow University Publ., 1984, pp. 61–81. (In Russ)
4. Newcomb T. M. An Approach to the Study of the Communicative Acts. Psychological Review, 1953, no. 6 (60), pp. 393–404.
5. Leontiev A. A. Psychology of communication. Moscow, Meaning Publ., Academy Publ., 2007, 368 p. (In Russ)
6. Lomov B. F. Methodological and theoretical problems of psychology. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1999, 350 p. (In Russ)
7. Chebotnikova T. A. Social role and verbal behavior of an individual: an invariant and variants. SISP, 2011, no. 4. Available at: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=19263342 (accessed 1 October 2018). (In Russ)
8. Gilson T. A., Latimer M., Lochbaum M. Post-LDAC Reflections of ROTC: Relationship to Leadership and Performance. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 2015, no. 2 (27), pp. 235–248. DOI: 10.1080/10413200.2014.982306
9. Goffman E. On Face-Work. An Analysis of Ritual Elements in Social Interaction. Psychiatry Interpersonal and Biological Processes, 1955, no. 3 (18), pp. 213–231. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00332747.1955.11023008 (In Eng)
10. Johnson S. K., Buckingham M. H., Morris S. L. at al. Adolescents ‘Character Role Models: Exploring the Human Personality. Research in Human Development, 2016, no. 2 (13), pp. 126–141. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15427609.2016.1164552
11. Van Mens-Verhulst J., Woertman L., Radtke L. Faculty women as models for women students: how context matters. Studies in Higher Education, 2015, no. 7 (40), pp. 1164–1178. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2013.865163
12. Gartland C. Student ambassadors: «role-models», learning practices and identities. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 2015, no. 8 (36), pp. 1192–1211. DOI: 10.1080/01425 692.2014.886940
13. Flint F. M., Flint S. A. The teacher as a role model in the professional self-determination of schoolchildren. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 2017, no. 6 (2), pp. 13–21.
14. Andreeva G. M. Social Psychology. Moscow, Aspect Press Publ., 2002, 364 p. (In Russ)
15. Kon I. S. Sociological psychology. Voronezh, MODEK Publ., 1999, 560 p. (In Russ)
16. Yadov V. A. Social identification in a crisis society. Sociological journal, 1994, no. 1, pp. 35–52. (In Russ)
17. Guseva N. V. Professional-role self-determination of cadets of universities of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia: author. dis…. Cand. psychol. sciences. Saint Petersburg, 2007, 21 p. (In Russ)
18. Perevozkina Yu. M. Impazo-role model for the diagnosis of socialization of the individual. Siberian Pedagogical Journal, 2016, no. 5, pp. 126–133. (In Russ)
19. Perevozkina Yu. M., Dmitrieva N. V., Perevozkin S. B. Impazo-role prediction of the features of socialization in the communicative sphere of adolescents. SMALTA, 2015, no. 4, pp. 39–46. (In Russ)
20. Neale M., Griffin A. A. A Model of Self-Held Workers and Role Transitions. Human Performance, 2006, no. 1 (19), pp. 23–41. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327043hup1901_2
21. Karmazin T. I. Socio-psychological characteristics of role-playing behavior of cadets of universities of the ground forces in the process of learning: author. diss…. Cand. psychol. sciences. M., 2004. 23 p. (In Russ)
22. Jung K. G. Soul and Myth. Six archetypes. Minsk, Harvest Publ., 2004, 400 p. (In Russ)
23. Khutorskoy A. V. Pedagogical innovation: methodology, theory, practice. Moscow, UC DO Publ., 2005, 222 p. (In Russ)
24. Druzhinin V. N. Essays on existential psychology. Saint-Petersburg, Peter Publ., 2010, 160 p. (In Russ)
25. Bradley J. P., Nicol A. A. Predictors of Military Training for Officer Cadets in the Canadian Forces. Military Psychology, 2006, no. 3 (18), pp. 219–226. DOI: 10.1207/s15327876mp1803_3
26. Wells K. Marching to be somebody: a cadet recruitment. Children’s Geographies, 2014, no. 3 (12), pp. 339–353. DOI: 10.1080/14733285.2014.922680
27. Bartone P. T., Johnsen B. H., Eid J., Brun W., Laberg J. C. Factors Influencing Small-Unit Cohesion in Norwegian Navy Officer Cadets. Military Psychology, 2002, no. 14 (1), pp. 1–22. DOI: 10.1207/S15327876MP1401_01
Supplementary files
For citation: Perevozkin S.B., Perevozkina Y.M. Role factors as a pedagogical innovation of interpersonal interaction of cadets. Professional education in the modern world. 2019;9(3):3027-3035. https://doi.org/10.15372/PEMW20190315
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
