.png)
.png)
Email this article 
Methodological approaches of quality management of higher education in the retrospective socio-economic transformation in Russia
https://doi.org/10.15372/PEMW20190314
Abstract
The article deals with methodological approaches to quality control of higher education in different historical periods of the Soviet Union and the Russian Federation, due to the state of scientific and pedagogical thought, the state of the economy and the direction of state policy. The concept of «quality of higher education» from a social and economic point of view, as a social good and educational service is considered. It is shown that during the first five years of Soviet power, the quality control was carried out on a personal-oriented pedological basis, then it was considered anti-scientific and replaced with taking into account formal indicators: academic performance, attendance, participation in socialist competition and others. In post-war years the quality control was focused on achievement of socially significant results for the state. Scientists developed a national system of quality education, qualimetric indicators and evaluation criteria. In the post-perestroika period in a market economy, under the conditions of the standardization of education and signing of the Bologna agreement, the quality management systems that meet international standards were developed and implemented in Russian universities. Russia aspired to the competitiveness of higher education and entry into the international educational space. The article shows the ambiguous attitude to the Bologna agreement of the scientific community. The initial directions of the development of quality management systems in Russian universities (SWOT analysis, TQM concept and ISO 9000:2000 standards) are outlined, the main features of the new international quality standard ISO 21 001:2018 are highlighted. It is determined, in accordance with domestic and foreign developments, that modern quality management systems should be mobile, constantly improving, taking into account national and international requirements, as well as based on the evaluation of quality processes in organizations. The historical stages of the state education quality regulation through licensing and the accreditation procedure are considered. The problems, as well as the main trends and prospects for improving the quality of higher education are highlighted. The quality of higher education is determined as a guarantee of training competitive, mobile and high-demand professionals.
About the Author
N. R. KruglovaRussian Federation
Nadezhda R. Kruglova – PhD in Pedagogics, Associate Professor at the Department of information, service and basic technical disciplines, Faculty of technology and entrepreneurship, 28, build. 3 Viluiskaya str., Novosibirsk,
Russian Federation
References
1. All-Union meeting of higher education institutions in the Kremlin. Moscow, Higher school Publ., 1973.
2. Gus’kova M. V. Fundamentals of achalasia in the management of the quality of education. Monograph. Moscow, INFA-M Publ., 2017, 204 p.
3. Davydov Yu. S. Bologna process. Myth or reality. Higher education in Russia, 2005, no. 10, pp. 3–11.
4. Seer E. F., Symanuk E. Competence approach to the modernization of vocational education. Higher education in Russia, 2005, no. 4, pp. 23–30.
5. Krasheninnikov V. V., Kruglova N. R., Nekrasova I. I. Cognitive activity of students and pedagogical quality monitoring at the faculty of technology and entrepreneurship. Monograph. Novosibirsk, NSPU Publ., 2007, 108 p.
6. Kruglova N. R. Pedagogical monitoring of the quality of training in higher education: Diss…. candidate of pedagogical Sciences: 13.00.08. Novosibirsk, 2009.
7. Leonov S. A. Formation of a common resource base and practical experience in the framework of combining higher education institutions in the supporting regional universities. Quality, innovation, education, 2018, no. 1, pp. 33–36.
8. Lvova L. S. The Role of quality assurance in higher education: an international dialogue of UNESCO, Russia, Eastern Europe and Central Asia. Professional education, 2018, no. 6, pp. 19–22.
9. Some aspects of the problem of ensuring the quality of education in higher education. Legal and organizational problems of the education system of the Russian Federation: present and future: Stat. and mater. CA. Part. Conf. Ed. by A. A. Voronina. Ekaterinburg, ros. gov’t. Profess.-teacher. un-ta, 2006, 216 p.
10. Sharapov A. I. Problems of modern education in the context of the Bologna process. Legal and organizational problems of the education system of the Russian Federation: present and future: Stat. and mater. Conf. Ed. A. A. Voronin. Ekaterinburg, RSPU Publ., 2006, 216 p.
11. Silaeva S. S., Semenov V. P., Zvezdova A. B. The Establishment of a management system of an educational organization on the basis of the principles and requirements of the new international standard ISO 21 001:2018. Quality, innovation, education, 2018, no. 5, pp. 5–10.
12. Smolin O. N. Education strategy – a matter of national security. Vocational education, 2018, no. 1, pp. 6–8.
13. Subetto A. I. Technology of data collection and processing in the process of monitoring the quality of education (at the Federal level). St. Petersburg, Moscow, Research center for quality training Publ., 2000, 49 p.
14. Tyurikov A. G., Orekhov N. I., Bolsunov A. I. etc. Modern education: challenges, status, prospects. Quality, innovation, education, 2017, no. 11, pp. 3–7.
15. Shaperenkova G. A. Model of management of educational systems in the context of modern requirements to the quality of education. Vestn. CHPU, 2009, no. 2, pp. 249–257.
16. Yaroslavtseva N. V. Formation and development of educational services in Western Siberia. Monograph. Novosib. state UN-t; novosib.in-t monitoring and development of education. Novosibirsk, CPI NSU Publ., 2018, 150 p.
17. Matthews W. E. The Missing Element in Higher Education. Journal for Quality & Participation, 1993, vol. 16 (1), pp. 102–108.
18. Sallis E. Total Quality Management in Education. New York, Rutledge Publ., 2009, 182 p.
19. Schargel F. P. Transforming Education through Total Quality Management: A. Practitioner Guide. Princeton Junction, 1994. 197 p.
20. Stevahn L., King J. A., Ghere G., Minnema J. Establishing essential competencies for evaluators. American Journal of Evaluation, 2005, vol. 26 (1), pp. 43–59.
21. Stevahn L., King J. A., Ghere G., Minnema J. Evaluator competitions in university-based evaluation training programs. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 2006, vol. 20 (1), pp. 101–123.
Supplementary files
For citation: Kruglova N.R. Methodological approaches of quality management of higher education in the retrospective socio-economic transformation in Russia. Professional education in the modern world. 2019;9(3):3019-3026. https://doi.org/10.15372/PEMW20190314
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
