Conceptual analysis of paired categories reflecting the organization and disorganization of the world in the system of socio-philosophical world view
https://doi.org/10.15372/PEMW20190311
Abstract
Introduction. At the beginning of the XXI century, social processes are becoming more complex, diverse, interconnected, proceeding with acceleration. Some processes are moving towards development, others are destructive, and still others are uncertain. This creates special conditions for social transformations, in which not only scenarios for the development and harmonization of global society, but also a sharp increase in global problems with the subsequent degradation of society and the nature of the planet are possible. Understanding modern social events and transformations requires of humanitarian specialists broad socio-philosophical worldview, based not only on modern knowledge, but also on the rich experience of the philosophical culture of the past age about possible manifestations of order and chaos in people's lives. The purpose of the article is to make a certain contribution to the formation of the modern socio-philosophical worldview by studying the opposite world processes and paired categories that reflect them, starting with the fundamental ones – space and chaos. Methodology and research methods. Applied: dialectical methodology; systemic and synergistic approaches; methods: the relationship of historical and logical, axiological, comparative, analogies, as well as the integration of the results. Results. The deep knowledge of the essence of modern processes is impossible without the cultural-philosophical analysis of a similar experience of past. The study showed that notions of the life instability not only of people and society, but also of the world as a whole, developed starting with the oldest primitive and archaic cultures. These fundamental views have undergone their transformation in later years of the mankind development, up to the present. Therefore, the experience of knowing past social events, enclosed in culture and social philosophy, contains a number of important knowledge that can serve as a basis for developing ways to stabilize, streamline modern social life and prevent the most dangerous crisis phenomena in modern civilization. The pairs of categories have been investigated: space and chaos, order and chaos, formation and destruction. Different aspects of the relations of the cosmos (order) and chaos (in statics, dynamics, self-movement), as well as the forms of manifestation of order and chaos in the past and present are determined. Conclusion. The important aspects of the socio-philosophical understanding of the relations of the cosmos (order) and chaos (in statics, dynamics, self-movement), as well as the forms of manifestation of order and chaos, which took place not only in the past, but in modern life as well, have been identified.
About the Author
O. P. KarnaukhovRussian Federation
Oleg P. Karnaukhov – Lecturer at the Department of Administrative law and administrative activities, 49 Chkalov Street, Barnaul, Russian Federation, postgraduate degree seeker at the Department of geopolitics and global studies of Siberian Federal University, Krasnoyarsk
References
1. Artashkina T. A. The problem of competitiveness of domestic education in the context of globalization. Vocational education in the modern world, 2017, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 755–765.
2. Maksimov S. V., Yatsenko M. P. Features of the study of mental aspects of military progress in the global world. Vocational education in the modern world, 2018, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 1990–1999.
3. Panarin V. I., Mamonov O. V., Puchkov O. E. Development of the Russian system of innovative education in the context of globalization. Professional education in the modern world, 2018, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 2167–2177.
4. Yatsenko M. P., Boyarsky M. A. Features of the study of the transformation of the national state in the global world. Vocational education in the modern world, 2018, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 2202–2211.
5. Elchaninov V. A., Panarin V. I., Parshikov V. I., Ushakova E. V. Anthroposocial inheritance as a scientific and educational problem in the conditions of informatization and digitalization. Professional Education in the Modern World, 2019, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 2451–2463.
6. Anisimov A. F. Cosmological representations of the peoples of the North. Moscow, Leningrad, Publishing House of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR, 1959, 106 p.
7. Evsyukov V. V. Myths about the universe. Novosibirsk, Science: Sib. Department, 198, 175 p.
8. Levy-Stros K. Primitive Thinking / Per. entry Art. A. B. Ostrovsky. Moscow, Republic Publ., 1994, 384 p. (Thinkers of the XX century.).
9. Toporov V. N. About cosmological sources of early historical descriptions. Transactions on sign systems. 1973, vol. 6, issue 308, pp. 106–150.
10. Freidenberg O. M. Introduction to the theory of ancient folklore. The myth and literature of antiquity. Moscow, Oriental literature of the Russian Academy of Sciences Publ., 1998, pp. 10–125.
11. Eliade M. Sacred texts of the peoples of the world. Moscow, Kron-Press Publ., 1998, 624 p.
12. Graham D. W. Criticism by Heraclitus of Ionian philosophy / Per. from English M. N. Wolf, ed.: Graham D. W. Heraclitus' criticism of Ionian philosophy. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy. Vol. XV / Ed. by C. C. W. Taylor Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1997. P. 1–50. Available at: https://nsu.ru/classics/Wolf/Graham-HERACLITUS-OSAP.pdf
13. Drach G. V. The birth of ancient philosophy and the beginning of anthropological problems. Moscow, Gardariki Publ., 2003, 318 p.
14. Lebedev A. V. Atonal model of space at Heraclitus. Historical and Philosophical Yearbook’87, Moscow, 1987, pp. 29–46.
15. Losev A. F. Ancient space and modern science. Genesis. name. Space. Author: Alexei Fedorovich Losev; comp. and ed. A. A. Tahoe Godi. Moscow, Thought Publ., 1993, 958 p.
16. Averintsev S. S. The order of space and the order of history in the worldview of the early Middle Ages. Antiquity and Byzantium, Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1975, pp. 266–285.
17. Gaidenko V. P., Smirnov A. G. Western European science in the Middle Ages. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1989, 352 p. (Library of the World History of Natural History).
18. Rozhansky I. D. The development of natural science in the era of antiquity. Early buckwheat. science «about nature». Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1979, 485 p.
19. Koyre A. From a closed world to an infinite universe. Translation from English. K. Golubovich, O. Zaitseva, V. Strelkov. Moscow, Logos Publ., 2001, 288 p.
20. Sagatovsky V. N. Philosophy of developing harmony: philosophical foundations of a worldview: In 3 hours. St. Petersburg: Publishing House of St. Petersburg State University, 1997–1999. Part 1: Philosophy and life: 1997. 222 p.; Part 2. Ontology: 1999. 268 p.; Part 3. Anthropology. Conclusion: 1999. 288 p.
21. Asoyan A. A. Space and chaos. «Information and analytical portal and hypertext electronic library «Russian ideology». Available at: http://russidea.rchgi.spb.ru/ideasinrussia/filcategory/index.php?ELEMENT_ID=3889
22. Jordanian B. V. Chaos and harmony. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1982, 343 p.
23. Losev A. F. Chaos. Myths of the World: Encyclopedia. In 2 vol. Ch. ed. S. A. Tokarev. Vol. 2. Moscow, Soviet Encyclopedia Publ., 1980, pp. 579–581.
24. Sagatovsky V. N. Space and chaos. Philosophical categories: author’s dictionary. St. Petersburg, SPbNIU ITMO Publ., 2011. Available at: http://vasagatovskij.narod.ru
25. Theoretical culturology. Moscow, Academic Project Publ.; Ekaterinburg, Business Book Publ.; RIC Publ, 2005, 624 р. (Series «Encyclopedia of Cultural Studies»)
26. Toporov V. N. Primeval Chaos. Myths of the World: Encyclopedia. In 2 vol. Ch. ed. S. A. Tokarev. Vol. 2. Moscow, Soviet Encyclopedia Publ., 1980, pp. 581–582.
27. Anthology of sources on the history, culture and religion of Ancient Greece. Ed. V. I. Kuzishchin. Textbook allowance. St. Petersburg, Aletheya Publ., 2000, 606 p.
28. Anthology of ancient philosophy. Comp. and the author of the foreword. S. V. Perevezentsev. Moscow, OLMA-PRESS Publ., 2001, 415 p.
29. Trubnikov N. N. The Time of Human Being. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1987, 255 p.
30. Mundus. Lat. term. Available at: http://www.symbolarium.ru/index.php/Mundus
31. Averintsev S. S. Poetics of early Byzantine literature. Moscow, Coda Publ., 1997, 343 p.
32. Engels F. Dialectics of nature. Marx K., Engels F. Compositions. 2nd ed. Vol. 20, pp. 176.
Supplementary files
For citation: Karnaukhov O.P. Conceptual analysis of paired categories reflecting the organization and disorganization of the world in the system of socio-philosophical world view. Professional education in the modern world. 2019;9(3):2984-2996. https://doi.org/10.15372/PEMW20190311
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.