.png)
.png)
Email this article 
Features of studying multi-polarity at university as an effective model of regulated global strategic stability
https://doi.org/10.15372/PEMW20190306
Abstract
The article is devoted to one of the most important aspects of international security, namely the formation of global strategic stability adequate to the realities of the modern world. The author offers to consider regulated multi-polarity as a model for prospective global system of strategic stability that responds to the challenges of modernity, and simultaneously takes into account the national interests of Russia. The political changes that occurred in the late 20th century, did not only lead to a new configuration of forces on the planet. Such transformation also stimulated growth of threats and challenges to international security in the new century. Conflicts exacerbated between states, related to uneven development as a result of globalization processes. The author provides evidence that today the gap in the levels of the countries welfare is deepening. The article notes that at this stage universal human values are ignored, and different models of development have become a subject of global competition. According to the author, the development of an effective model of global strategic sustainability implies a multipolar system, the foundations of which should be studied at the level of university education.
About the Authors
M. P. YatsenkoRussian Federation
Mikhail P. Iatsenko – Doctor of Philosophy, Professor at the Department of Global Studies and Geopolitics, 79 Svobodny Av., 660041 Krasnoyarsk
I. D. Peskovec
Russian Federation
Ivan D. Peskovec – post-graduate student at the Department of Global Issues and Geopolitics, 79 Svobodny Av., 660041 Krasnoyarsk
References
1. Barbashina E. V. The need for critical thinking in the conditions of the transformation of education. Professionalnoe obrazovanie v sovremennom mire = Professional education in the modern world, 2018, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 1777–1787. (In Russ)
2. Heidegger M. Being and time. Moscow, Ad Marginem Publ., 1997, 452 p. (In Russ)
3. Etzioni A. From the empire to the community: a new approach to international relations. Moscow, Ladomir Publ., 2004, 293 p. (In Russ)
4. Forrester D. World dynamics. Moscow, AST Publ., 2003, 379 p. (In Russ)
5. Toffler E. The Third Wave. Moscow, AST Publ., 2002, 557 p. (In Russ)
6. Bogdanov A. A. Questions of socialism. Moscow, Politizdat Publ., 1990, 480 p. (In Russ)
7. Sergeytsev T. To the sociology of Russian postsocialism. Odnako = However, 2014, no. 173, pp. 24–51. (In Russ)
8. Maksimov S. V., Yatsenko M. P. Features of the study of mental aspects of military progress in the global world. Professionalnoe obrazovanie v sovremennom mire = Professional education in the modern world, 2018, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 1990–1999. (In Russ)
9. Terentyev A. Ukrainian crisis and a turn to the East. Odnako = However, 2014, no. 174, pp. 58–85. (In Russ)
10. Badov V. Maidan, Bakunin and Aunt Nuland. Odnako = However, 2014, no. 174, pp. 102–113. (In Russ)
11. Kholina L. I., Seredkin N. A. Vocational training of cadets of a military university for management in the process of solving tactical problems. Professionalnoe obrazovanie v sovremennom mire = Professional education in the modern world, 2016, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 268–274. (In Russ)
12. Golubovsky D. Geostrategic joker. Odnako = However, 2014, no. 174, pp. 150–165. (In Russ)
13. Nazarova M. A., Chernykh S. I. Transformation of identity in society. Professional»noe obrazovanie v sovremennom mire = Professional education in the modern world, 2017, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 1163–1168. (In Russ)
14. Girenok F. I. Metaphysics of Pat. Moscow, Labirint Publ., 1995, 307 p. (In Russ)
15. Kuznetsov V. Yu. The world of unity. Moscow, Academic Project Publ., Alma Mater Publ., 2010, 207 p. (In Russ)
16. Ivashov L. G. The global world is striving for bipolarity. Geopolitika i bezopasnost’ = Geopolitics and Security, 2012, no. 1 (17), pp. 28–33. (In Russ)
17. Ilyin I. V., Ursul A. D. Actual problems of global research: Russia in a globalizing world. Russia in the XXI century: global challenges, risks and solutions. Analysis. Expertise. Recommendations. Monograph. Ed. M. Ch. Zalikhanov, S. A. Stepanov. Moscow, MNEPU Publ., 2019, pp. 15–34. (In Russ)
18. Greenberg R. S. Actual problems of socio-technological and economic development in modern Russia. Russia in the XXI century: global challenges, risks and solutions. Analysis. Expertise. Recommendations. Monograph. Ed. M. Ch. Zalikhanov, S. A. Stepanov. Moscow, MNEPU Publ., 2019, pp. 75–81. (In Rus)
19. Saykin E. A. Social roles and multidimensionality of an individual. Idei i idealy = Ideas and ideals, 2010, no. 3 (5), pp. 68–73. (In Russ)
20. Chumakov A. N. Cultural and civilizational research: their role and value in the global world. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 27. Globalistika i geopolitika = Moscow State University Bulletin. Series 27. Global studies and geopolitics, 2018, no. 1, pp. 30–44.
Supplementary files
For citation: Yatsenko M.P., Peskovec I.D. Features of studying multi-polarity at university as an effective model of regulated global strategic stability. Professional education in the modern world. 2019;9(3):2938-2947. https://doi.org/10.15372/PEMW20190306
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
