.png)
.png)
Email this article 
Psychological aspects of educational communication in regards to new didactic paradigm
https://doi.org/10.15372/PEMW20190219
Abstract
The paper explores students» reflexive ideas about such aspects of didactic communication with a teacher as space and time of educational interaction (temporal-topological aspect), educational content, organizational model of communication, means and methods of interaction (interactive aspect), individual-personal features of communicators, relevant for educational interaction. The author compares students» opinions about ideal educational communication and their real estimation. The research aims at theoretical and empirical modeling of the construct «didactic communication». Research methods are seen as follows: theoretical and empirical modeling of the construct «didactic communication». The author applied inventory Psychological structure of the educational communication and the Constructivist test. The research was carried out with the secondand third-year students of Tsiolkovski Kaluga State University (Pedagogical Faculty). The author highlights that there are conjugate (coherent) statements on the sample of students» opinions on the preferred parameters of didactic communication with the teacher. The most desirable characteristics are seen as spatial-temporal, content and individual-personal aspects arranged in compliance with students» expectations. In their subjective assessments of real learning interaction, the subjects most highly noted the group modus of didactic communication, which is fully confirmed by an external criterion: the student community is actually a communicative network, and their communications are not confined to the student, on the contrary, are more addressed to fellow students. At the same time to assessing the real interactions our probationers have pointed to the feeling of low contribution and estrangement in communicative process control. Deficient activity in the educational interactions is partially compensated with the activity in the non-formal student communication.
About the Author
P. V. MenshikovRussian Federation
Petr V. Menshikov – Associate Professor at the Chair of Psychological Development and Education
248023, Kaluga, Razaina str., 26
References
1. Arpentieva M. R. [Meta-cognitive structures and understanding in didactic communication]. Mir psikhologii = World of Psychology, 2017, no. 2 (90), pp. 186–198. (in Russ.)
2. Arpentieva M. R. [Network concept in education] In: Networking as a condition for the formation of a new quality of vocational education. Collection of materials of the II All-Russian scientific-practical conference (April 5, 2017, Borisoglebsk, Voronezh Region). Borisoglebsk: Borisoglebsky College of Industrial and Information Technologies, Ritm Publishing House, 2017. P. 5–14. (in Russ.)
3. Arpentieva M. R., Menshikov P. V. [New investigations of the educational communication] Ed. M. R. Arpentieva. Kaluga, Tsiolkovskiy University Publishing house, 2017. 426 p. (in Russ.)
4. Gurevich K. M. [Differential psychology matters]. Voronezh: Moscow, Applied psychology institute Publ., 1998, 384 p. (in Russ.)
5. Zimnyaya I.A. [The key competences as the goal-oriented principles of the conpetence approach in the education]. Moscow, Research Centre of personnel training quality, 2004, 41 p. (in Russ.)
6. Lyaudis V. Y., Negure I. P. [Psychological principles of the literary speech training by the juniors]. Moscow, International pedagogical academy, 1994, 150 p. (in Russ.)
7. Menshikov P. V. [Phenomenon of the educational communication: monograph]. Kaluga, Tsiolkovski University Publ., 2017. 326 p. (in Russ.)
8. Menshikov P. V., Arpentieva M. R. [Didactic communication modern and classical research] / Ed. M. Arpentieva. Toronto: Altaspera Publishing, 2018. 341 p.
9. Arpentieva M. R. (ed.) Psychology and pedagogy of the future: youth foresight.Youth and psychology: ideas and projects. In: Actual problem of the practical psychology. Volume 5. Сanada, Toronto: Altaspera Publishing & Literary Agency Inc., 2018. 504 p. (Ser.)
10. Nagornova A. Yu. (ed.) [Theoretical basis and development of modern Russian education.Team’s work]. Uljanovsk, Zebra Publ., 2017. 326 p. (in Russ.)
11. Arpentieva M. R. (ed.) Foresight Education: Values, Models and Technologies of Didactic Communication of the XXI Century In: Actual problem of the practical psychology. Volume 4. Сanada, Toronto: Altaspera Publishing & Literary Agency Inc., 2018. 710 p.
12. Khutorskoi A. V. [Meta-subject approach in the education]. Moscow: Ejdos, Educational anthropology institute Publ., 2012, 73 p. (in Russ.)
13. Zuljan M., Vogrinc J. (ed.) Facilitating effective student learning through teacher research and innovation. Slovenia, Ljubljana: University of Ljubljana, 2010. 495 p.
14. Barnett R. Learning to work and working to learn. Supporting lifelong learning, Vol. 2: Organizing learning. London: Routledge Falmer, 2002, pp. 7–20.
15. Cormier D. Rhizomatic Education: Community as Curriculum. In: Dave»s Educational Blog, 2008. Available at: http://davecormier.com/edblog/2008/06/03/rhizomatic-education-community-as-curriculum/ (accessed March 24, 2019).
16. Crouch C. H., Mazur E. Peer instruction: Ten years of experience and results. American Journal of Physics, 2016, Vol. 9, pp. 970–977.
17. Downes S. The Role of Open Educational Resources in Personal Learning. Open Educational Resources: Innovation, Research and Practice. Athabasca: UNESCO, 2013. Availllable at: http://www.col.org/resources/publications/Pages/detail.aspx?PID=446 (accessed March 24, 2019).
18. Nabi A. E. Constructivist Translation Classroom Environment Survey (CTLES); Development, Validation and Application. The International Journal for Translation & Interpreting Research, 2013, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 163–182.
19. Pritchard A. Ways of Learning: Learning theories and learning styles in the classroom. New York, Routledge, 2013, 160 p.
20. Robbins J. Contexts, collaboration and cultural tools: a sociocultural perspective on researching children’s thinking. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 2005, vol. 6 (2), pp. 140–149.
21. Rogoff B. The cultural nature of human development. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003, XIII+448 p.
22. Siemens G. Connectivism: A Learning Theory for the Digital Age. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 2005, vol. 2, no. 1. Available at: http://www.itdl.org/Journal/Jan_05/article01.htm (accessed March 24, 2019).
23. Stone C.A. What is missing in the metaphor of scaffolding? In: E.A. Forman, N. M. Minick, C.A. Stone (Eds.) Context for learning. Sociocultural dynamic in children development. New York: Oxford University Press, 1993, pp. 169–183.
24. Tharp R. G., Gallimore R. Rousing minds to life: Teaching, learning, and schooling in social context. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1988, 340 p.
25. Van Boxtel C., Van der Linden С., Kanselaar G. Collaborative learning tasks and the elaboration of conceptual knowledge. Learning and Instruction, 2000, vol. 10 (4), pp. 311–330.
26. Van de Pol J., Volman M., Beishuizen J. Scaffolding in teacher-student interaction: A decade of research. Educational Psychology Review, 2010, vol. 22 (3), pp. 271–297.
27. Wells G., Claxton G. Introduction: Sociocultural perspectives on the future of education. In: G. Wells, G. Claxton (Eds.) Learning for life in the 21st century. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers, 2002, pp. 1–18.
Supplementary files
For citation: Menshikov P.V. Psychological aspects of educational communication in regards to new didactic paradigm. Professional education in the modern world. 2019;9(2):2823-2831. https://doi.org/10.15372/PEMW20190219
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
