.png)
.png)
Email this article 
Социально психологический тренинг как инструмент развития инновативных качеств личности
https://doi.org/10.15372/PEMW20190218
Abstract
The article highlights the experimental results of the research aimed at improving the innovative abilities of students when studying at university, demonstrating the possibilities of socio-psychological training as a tool for development of innovative abilities. The object of the research is the characteristics of innovative personality; the subject of the research is the impact of socio-psychological training on development of students» innovation in when studying at higher institution. As a result of the theoretical analysis, the authors found a discrepancy between the scientific ideas about the filling of the construct «innovativeness» of a person, despite the common nature of identifying certain features characteristic of an innovative person (creativity, communicative competence, reflexivity, risk, striving for success, etc.). The authors proposed a program for development of innovative personal features and provided an assessment of the effectiveness of the program using psychological testing and methods of mathematical statistics on a sample of 80 students. As a result of the experiment, the subjects from the experimental group became more curious, began to relate to a greater degree the possibility of achieving success with changes and manifestation of activity, and also perceive themselves as more creative people, they increased the number of proposed ideas, their originality and development. These results, as well as the emergence of significant differences with a predominance of high values for the studiedparameters of «innovativeness» in subjects from the experimental group compared to the control group, allows us to conclude about the effectiveness of the proposed program for the development of innovative personality traits in the youth environment in the process of learning at the university.
About the Authors
O. S. ShemelinaRussian Federation
Olga S. Shemelina – Associate Professor of psychology and pedagogy, Faculty of Humanities
630073, Novosibirsk, Karl Marx Avenue, House, 20
E. S. Bykova
Russian Federation
Evgeniya S. Bykova – Senior Lecturer of psychology and pedagogy, Faculty of Humanities
630073, Novosibirsk, Karl Marx Avenue, House, 20
References
1. Anisimov N. [The components of the innovation potential]. School Director, 1997, no. 3, pp. 67–70. (in Russ.)
2. Veselova E. K., Artemeva V.A. [Innovative personality: moral and psychological aspects]. Bulletin of civil engineers, 2014, no. 4, pp. 128–133. (in Russ.)
3. Gorev P. M., Utemov V. V. [Scientific creativity. A practical guide to the development of creative thinking (Methods and techniques of TRIZ)]. Moscow, Lenand Publ., 2017.
4. Zagorulia T. B. Actualization of the personality of students as carriers of innovative culture: theory and practice: dis…. dr. ped. Sciences: 13.00.01. Ekaterinburg, Russian State Vocational and Pedagogical University, 2017, 410 p.
5. Zagorulia T. B. [Personality as a carrier of innovative culture]. Historical and socio-educational thought, 2014, no. 4, pp. 107–112. (in Russ.)
6. Kapustina V.A., Kozlova Yu.A. [The influence of binary practical exercises on the motivation of teaching students of the university and their professionally significant skills]. Modern Education, 2016, no. 4, pp. 103–112. (in Russ.)
7. Kornilova T. V., Chumakova M.A. [The scales of tolerance and intolerance to uncertainty in the modification of S. Badner’s questionnaire]. Experimental Psychology, 2014, no. 1, pp. 92–110. (in Russ.)
8. Lebedeva N. M., Tatarko A. N. [Methods of research on the relationship of the individual to innovation]. Almanac of modern science and education, 2009, no. 4 (23), part II, pp. 89–96. (in Russ.)
9. Meerovich M.I., Shragina L.I. [Technology of Creative Thinking: A Practical Guide]. Minsk, Harvest, 2003.
10. Murovanaya N. N. Innovative Personality Culture: Characterization of the Concept. The implementation of the competence approach in the system of vocational education of the teacher. Simferopol, Arial Publ., 2018.
11. Rodina E. N., Lapaeva E. V. Interactive learning as a prerequisite for the formation of the innovative potential of the individual. Educational experiment in education, 2018, no. 3, pp. 8–13. (in Russ.)
12. Semenov I. N. [Milestones and the logic of the development of reflexive psychology of creativity at the turn of the XV–XXI centuries]. Psychology. Historical and critical reviews and current research, 2013, no. 3–4, pp. 7–32. (in Russ.)
13. Sidorov V. V., Rezanovich I. V. [Formation of innovative potential of technical college students]. Siberian Pedagogical Journal, 2010, no. 2, pp. 328–334. (in Russ.)
14. Sitnikov A. P. Acmeological training: Theory. The technique. Psychology. Moscow, Texnological School of Business, 1996. (in Russ.)
15. Strategy of innovative development of the Russian Federation for the period up to 2020. Available at: http://innovation.gov.ru/sites/default/files/documents/2014/5636/1238.pdf (accessed: January 29, 2015) (in Russ.)
16. Tunik E. E. [Modified Williams creative tests]. St. Petersburg, Speech Publ., 2003. (in Russ.)
17. Shmeleva E.A. The development of the innovation potential of the individual in the scientific and educational environment of a pedagogical university: dissertation Dr. Psychol. sciences. Nizhny Novgorod, Nizhegor. state architecture.-building. un-t, 2013. (in Russ.)
18. Sternberg R. J. [Sharpen your Intelligence]. Minsk, Popurri Publ., 2000. (in Russ.)
19. Fedotov V.A. [The relationship of values and innovative attitudes among representatives of different generations of Russians]. Social psychology and society, 2016, no. 7, pp. 82–92. (in Russ.)
20. Yagolkovsky S. R. [Psychology of innovation: approaches, models, processes]. Moscow, NRU Higher School of Economics Publ., 2011. (in Russ.)
21. Collings D. G., Mellahi K. Strategic Talent Management: A review and research agenda. Human Resource Management Review, 2009, pp. 304–313.
22. Chan D. W., Chan L., Zhao Y. Twenty-five years of gifted education research in Hong Kong 1984– 2008: What lessons have we learned? Educational Research Journal, 2009, vol. 24, pp. 135–164.
23. Farao C., Gianecchini M. University Talent Management: an experimental design to enhance students» employability. WOA Organizing between reality and appearance in times of change. Pisa, University of Pisa, 2017. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/313720556 (accessed January 29, 2017)
24. Hughes D. J., Rowe M., Batey M., Lee A. A tale of two sites: Twitter vs. Facebook and thepersonality predictors of social media usage. Computers in Human Behavior, 2012, no. 28 (2), pp. 561–569.
25. Kumar M., Bharadwaj A. Psychology of innovation: innovating human psychology? Technological and Institutional Innovations for Marginalized Smallholders in Agricultural Development, 2016. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-25718-1_4
Supplementary files
For citation: Shemelina O.S., Bykova E.S. . Professional education in the modern world. 2019;9(2):2814-2822. https://doi.org/10.15372/PEMW20190218
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
