.png)
.png)
Email this article 
Teacher, Student and administrator in educational process: strengthening the archetype of hierarchy
https://doi.org/10.15372/PEMW20190202
Abstract
The authors have made an attempt to consider the consequences of strengthening the role of the administrator in the modern educational process from the standpoint of the concept of archetypes of the collective unconscious, which allows to identify unconscious «programs»that are strung on the cultural and symbolic experience of consciousness. The paper analyzes the interrelations of archetypal figures of the pupil, teacher and administrator. The authors observed a balanced impact of the archetypes of corporativity and hierarchy in the interaction between a teacher and a student. On the one hand, they are both equal in their opposition to the world and in their identification with the we-self. On the other hand, the teacher is supposed to have higher with the certain power in relation to the student. The teacher is regarded as a «guide» to the area of implicit knowledge, as a person who «launches» collective unconscious programs in a student, in which the experience of previous generations is fixed on the archetypal level. The transfer of a fixed cultural code to the student, which allows to achieve the necessary level of coherence with other members of the community, is the main task of the education system. The authors show the strengthening of the role of the Government in the educational process, which brought the figure of an administrator, which significantly increased the archetype of the hierarchy. This led to the following consequences: a decrease in the independence of the social institution of education; distortion of the motives of the participants of the educational process with a reorientation to formal indicators set by the external environment; formalization of interpersonal relations between the participants of the educational process; reducing the sense of unity and belonging generated by the archetype of corporativity; increased competition between educational institutions; the emergence and flourishing of various forms of distant education.
About the Authors
Iu. V. Gritskov,Russian Federation
Yuri V. Gritskov – doctor of philosophical sciences, professor, professor, department of philosophy
660032, Krasnoyarsk, Belinskogo st. 1, 312
D. V. Lvov
Russian Federation
Denis V. Lvov – candidate of philosophical sciences, associate professor, associate professor, department of sociology
660001, Krasnoyarsk, Lado Ketskhoveli st. 69, 87
References
1. Polanyi M. [Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy]. Moscow, 1985, 344 p. (in Russ.)
2. Lebedev S. A. [Tacitknowledge]. Filosofi slovarosnovnyihterminov. = Philosophy of Science: a dictionary of basic terms. Available at: https://philosophy_of_science.academic.ru/249/%D0%9D%D0%95%D0%AF%D0%92%D0%9D%D0%9E%D0%95_%D0%97%D0%9D%D0%90%D0%9D%D0%98%D0%95 (accessed January 17. 2018). (in Russ.)
3. Gubanova E. O. [Tacit knowledge: essence and species]. Znanie. Ponimanie. Umenie = Knowledge. Understanding. Skill, 2010, no. 4, pp. 253–256. (in Russ.)
4. Jung K. G. [Essays on the psychology of the unconscious]. Moscow, 2010, 352 p. (in Russ.)
5. Fromm E. [Escape from freedom]. Moscow, 2007, 272 p. (in Russ.)
6. Universitet v Rossiyskoyimperii XVIII – pervoypolovinyi XIX veka [University in the Russian Empire of the XVIII the fi half of the XIX century]. Moscow, 2012, 671 p. (in Russ.)
7. Bourdieu P., Passeron J. C. [Reproduction: elements of the theory of the education system]. Moscow, 2007, 267 p. (in Russ.)
8. Valentinova O. I. [Bureaucratization of society bureaucratization of language]. Russkaya rech = Russian speech, 2010, no. 6, pp. 63–65. (in Russ.)
9. Artamonova E. V. [Control and Appraisal Component in the Conditions of Reforming the Domestic Vocational Education: Problems and Prospects of Development]. Vektor nauki Tolyattinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Pedagogika, psihologiya = Vector of science of Togliatti State University. Series: Pedagogy, psychology, 2017, no. 2 (29), pp. 9–13. (in Russ.)
10. Golosnov O. A., Popova S. L. [Prospects for the development of human capital on the way to a knowledge society in Russia]. Diskussiya = Discussion, 2017, no. 6 (80), pp. 101–110. (in Russ.)
11. Vysotskaya A. V. [USE: results, quality of education and regional differences (analytical review of publications in e-library.ru)]. Universum: obschestvennyie nauki = Universum: sociak sciences, 2017, no. 8 (38), pp. 14–17. (in Russ.)
12. Nikolayenko G. A., Fedorova A. A. [Russian universities in world rankings: successes, failures, prospects]. Sotsiologiya nauki I tehnologiy = Sociology of science and technology, 2017, no. 1, pp. 96–112 (in Russ.)
13. Yudina A. S., Pavlova I. A. [International ratings and competitivenessofuniversities ]. Vestnik nauki Sibiri = Bulletin of siberian science, 2017, no. 1 (24), pp. 1–24. (in Russ.)
14. Patsukevich O. V. [In search of a world-class university (from the history of the emergence of the Shanghai ranking)]. Vestnik Belorusskoy gosudarstvennoy selskohozyaystvennoy akademii = Bulletin of the Belarusian State Agricultural Academy, 2017, no. 2, pp. 152–155. (in Russ.)
15. Matsibora M. G. [From the history of the formation of correspondence education in Russia]. Vestnik Kostromskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta = Bulletin of the Kostroma State University, 2007, no. 3, pp. 41–45 (in Russ.)
16. Matsibora M. G. [FormationofthecorrespondenceeducationofadultsinRussia] Chelovekiobrazovanie = Human and education, 2008, no. 3, pp. 79–82. (in Russ.)
17. Lebedeva M. B. [Massive open online courses as a development trend of education]. Chelovekiobrazovanie = Human and education, 2015, no. 1 (42), pp. 105–108. (in Russ.)
18. Travkin I. Yu. [Non-formal education in the Internet: from net communities to massive open online courses]. Obrazovatelnyietehnologiiiobschestvo = Educational technologies and society, 2015, no. 2, pp. 441–471. (in Russ.)
19. Andreev A. Yu. [Russian universities of the XVIII fi half of the XIX century in the context of university history of Europe]. Moscow, 2009, 640 p. (in Russ.)
20. Morozov O. Wilhelm von Humboldt and Berlin University: A New Look at the Origin of the Humboldt Myth? Working Papers: Humanities. WPBRP 134/HUM/2016. Available at: https://wp.hse.ru/data/2016/10/20/1108079812/134HUM2016.pdf (accessed January 19, 2018).
21. Babintsev V. P., Rimskiy V. P. [Bureaucratization of the university as an anti-intellectual process]. Nauka. Iskusstvo. Kultura = Science. Art. Culture, 2014, no. 4, pp. 5–17. (in Russ.)
Supplementary files
For citation: Gritskov, I.V., Lvov D.V. Teacher, Student and administrator in educational process: strengthening the archetype of hierarchy. Professional education in the modern world. 2019;9(2):2654-2662. https://doi.org/10.15372/PEMW20190202
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
