.png)
.png)
Email this article 
University crisis: from «versatile personality» to «the robot proof specialist»
https://doi.org/10.15372/PEMW20180417
Abstract
The research aims at analyzing national education. Globalization as a cultural phenomenon assumes distribution of economic, legal, sociological, and other theories, including digital technologies, in the sphere of their application in science, art and education. Globalization aims at transmitting values, models of self-perception and world perception, as well as models of communication between countries considered to be carriers of universal human culture, «civilization» (Europe and the USA) into barbarian countries of the «second» and the «third» worlds. In the process of globalization, education is particularly evident. It moves from upbringing and training of Homo sapiens person to «training» of the specialist, Homo habilis, and, further, to the «formation» of the consumer, Homo consúmens, after which the formation of a «robot-resistant» person of service or Homo officialis. The latter is naturally supplemented by Homo dominus, the formation of which can be completely different, but, in general, is not a necessity: Unification of power, cephalization of control (mondialization) actually counteract development. Digital technologies are just a small part of the process. Destruction of traditional education at the university is associated with the fact that the modern universi ty is outdated, unable to form a level of competence of students, sufficient to effectively solve problems in all areas of activity and in all specific situations. The author highlights that in a rapidly changing society, in which new fields of activity and new situations appear, training should be more dynamic. The purpose of such training in the university is seen in the formation of key competencies related to the chosen major and specifics of professional self-realization. Thus, instead of the supposed «expansion» and «dynamization», education narrows and becomes more and «stationary». Elements of scientific search, co-creativity, are withdrawn, replaced by the production of templates, allowing to achieve a state of competitiveness in relation to robots and technologies in general.
About the Authors
M. R. ArpentievaRussian Federation
Mariam R. Arpentieva – Doctor of Psychological Sc., Associate Professor, Corresponding Member of the Russian Academy of Natural Sciences (RANS), leading Researcher Fellow at the Chair of Theory and Methods of Physical Education
Khanty-Mansiysk, Khanty-Mansiysk Autonomous Disctrict – Yugra
S. V. Gridneva
Russian Federation
Svetlana V. Gridneva – Candidate of Psychology, Associate Professor at the Chair of General and Pedagogical Psychology at the Academy of Psychology and Pedagogics
Rostov-on-Don
A. I. Tashcheva
Russian Federation
Anna I. Tashcheva – Candidate of Psychology, Associate Professor at the Chair of Personality Psychology and Consultative Psychology, the Head of Psychological Department at the Academy of Psychology and Pedagogics
Rostov-on-Don
References
1. Nietzsche F. [On the future of our educational institutions (1871–1872)]. Minsk, Popurri Publ., 2000, 62 p.
2. Arpentieva M. R. [Humanistics: the goals of «robot-proof education»]. Setevoe vzaimodeystvie kak uslovie formirovaniya novogo kachestva professionalnogo obrazovaniya. Sbornik materialov III Vserossiyskoy (s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem) nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii [Proceedings of III Russian (with international participation) sci. conf «Network interaction as a condition of a new quality formation in professional education»]. Borisoglebsk, April 5, 2018. Voronezh, Ritm Publ., 2018. P. 5–10.
3. Barber M., Donnelly K., Rizvi S. [Facing avalanche collapse]. Voprosy obrazovaniya = Problems of education, 2013, no. 3, pp. 152–231. (In Russ.)
4. Evrezov D. V., Maier B. O. [Foresight and Russian education]. Professionalnoe obrazovanie v sovremennom mire = Professional education in the modern world, 2013, no. 3 (10), pp. 17–28. (In Russ.)
5. Aoun J. E. Robot-Proof: Higher Education in the Age of Artificial Intelligence. New York, London: MIT Press, 2017, 216 p.
6. Kriukov S.V. [Foresight]. Prostranstvo ekonomiki = Economic space, 2010, no. 3–2, pp. 7–17 (In Russ.)
7. Cubberly E. P. Public School Administration: A Statement of the Fundamental Principles. New York: Nabu Press. 1905/2014, 546 p.
8. Dewey J. My Pedagogical Creed. New York: Forgotten Books, 1897/2017, 50 p.
9. Abakumova I. V., Ermakov P. N., Fomenko V. T., Gridneva S. V., Zvezdina G. P., Tashcheva A. I., Iushko G. N. [Managed individual training in a modern university: theoretical aspects and practical guidance: a practice-oriented monograph]. Rostov-on-Don, SFU Press, 2014, 400 p.
10. Minigalieva M. R. [Education and educational interaction: ability to learn and ability to teach. A methodological manual for students, students and parents, as well as teachers of higher and secondary schools]. Kaluga, Tsiolkovsky KSU Press, 2014, 32 p.
11. Arpentieva M. R., Menshikov P. V. [Didactic communication: ability to learn and the ability to teach]. Kaluga, Tsiolkovsky KSU Press, 2017, 354 p. (In Russ.)
12. Budushchee obrazovaniya: globalnaya povestka. Doklad, podgot. ASI Skolkovo i Skoltekhom [The future of education: a global agenda. Report prepared by ASI Skolkovo and Skoltekh]. Available at: edu2035.org/pdf/GEF.Agenda_en.pdf (accessed September10, 2017).
13. Zhukova G. K. [The Forsyte Saga or on the idols of Global Education]. VIII zasedanie Molod. diskuss. kluba RISI «Inostrannoe vliyanie na sferu obrazovaniya v Rossi [Proceedings of VIII meeting of Youth Club RISI «International influence on education in Russia»]. St. Petersburg, RIAC. Available at: http://katyusha.org/view?id=3365 (accessed September 10, 2017).
14. Peskov D., et al. [What education forsyte is]. Nauka i tekhnologii Rossii = Science and Technology of Russia. Available at: http://www.strf.ru/material.aspx?CatalogId=354&d_no=72965#.WcgOQLJJbIV (accessed September 10, 2017).
15. Bok D. [Pros and cons of commercialization]. Otechestvennye zapiski = National notes, 2003, no. 6 (14), pp. 56–72. (In Russ.)
16. Grachev I. [The new which is well-forgotten]. Literaturnaya gazeta = Literary magazine, 2007, August 8–14, no. 32, pp. 13. (In Russ.)
17. Lyotard J.-F. [Situation of postmodernity]. St. Petersburg, Aleteya Publ., 1998, pp. 118–119.
18. Eagletone T. [Slow destruction of university]. Sovet rektorov = Rectors Council, 2015, no. 4, pp. 19–26.
19. Ivanov O. B. [Global risks and tendencies of modern world]. ETAP: Ekonomicheskaya Teoriya, Analiz, Praktika = ETAP: Economic Theory, Analysis and Practice, 2017, no. 1, p. 7–20. (In Russ.)
20. Korneeva V. Iu., Shipanov E. F. [Risk management system in corporate structures in economic conditions]. Vestnik Donskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta = Bulletin of Don State Technical University, 2010, vol. 10, no. 5 (48). pp. 798–807. (In Russ.)
21. Filatov A.A. et.al. [Risk management, audit and internal control], Moscow, Izdatelskie resheniya Publ., 2015, 248 p. (In Russ.)
22. [Results of the Tempus program and the new program Erasmus +]. Moscow, Erasmus +, NEO in Russia, 2016. 38 p. Available at: http://www.ric.vsu.ru/UserFiles/File/201505/20150512/20150 512_Anna_Muraveva.pdf (accessed March 15, 2018) (In Russ.)
23. Tashcheva A. I., Gridneva S. V. [Quality improvement of psychological and pedagogical education in the university]. XXVI Merlinskiye chteniya: Psikhologicheskie innovatsii v obrazovanii. materialy Vserossiyskoy nauchnoy konf., posv. 90-letiyu so dnya obrazovaniya PGPI-PGPU [Proceedings of Russian sci.conf. devoted to 90th anniversary of PSPI-PSPU foundation XXVI Merlin readings: Psychological innovations in education]. Perm, PSPU Press, 2011, pp. 175–177.
24. Pulbere A.I. Sistema monitoring kak sredstvo upravleniya kachestvom nepreryvnogo tekhnicheskogo obrazovaniya. Diss. dokt. ped. nauk [Monitoring system as a means of quality control in lifelong technical learning. Doct. ped. sci. thesis]. Rostov-on-Don, T. Shevchenko Dnestr State University Press, 2006, 441 p.
25. Dunning Th. J. Trade’s Unions and Strikes: Their Philosophy and Intention. London: Published by the author, and Sold by M. Harley, no 5, Raquet court, Fleet street, E. C., 1860. 52 p.
26. Marx K. Capital: A Critique of Political Economy – The Process of Capitalist Production, Palala Press, 2018, 884 p.
Supplementary files
For citation: Arpentieva M.R., Gridneva S.V., Tashcheva A.I. University crisis: from «versatile personality» to «the robot proof specialist». Professional education in the modern world. 2018;8(4):2298-2308. https://doi.org/10.15372/PEMW20180417
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
