.png)
.png)
Email this article 
Features exploring the transformation of the nation state in the global world
https://doi.org/10.15372/PEMW20180408
Abstract
The article explores the main directions for solving problems related to the study of the national characteristics of the State in a period of social crisis. The authors focus on the need to develop fundamentally new methodology, without which such a learning process is defective. In this connection, the authors highlighted the leading concept of characterizing our liberal education. They also draw attention to the need to use pedagogic experience, which proved itself in the history of the educational system in Russia. The article analyzes the leading concept of the origin of the State and society, as well as features of their functioning in different historical periods. The paper shows the main traditions that allowed young people to form a harmonious socio-cultural outlook, where the role of State structures covered adequately. Particular attention is paid to the analysis of major transformation, which bears the globalization processes and has identity of individual societies. The authors analyze mondialism as one of the dominant concepts, accompanying modern globalization. The authors argue that many problems are caused by the uncertainty of the axiological orientation that characterizes the educational system not only to Russia but also the entire world. Failure to address socio-economic problems of the modern Russian State increasingly actualizes the problem a new humanitarian education, which would take into account to the maximum extent of our history and features of modern life. The authors make case that it is important to revive unique theoretical works of Russian thinkers of the past in order to study the nature and role of the State in the world.
About the Authors
M. P. IatsenkoRussian Federation
Mikhail P. Iatsenko – Doctor of Philosophic Sc., Professor at the Chair of Global Studies and Geopolitics
79 Svobodny Av., 660041 Krasnoyarsk ция
M. A. Boyarskiy
Russian Federation
Maxim A. Boyarskiy – PhD-student at the Chair of Globalization and Geopolitics
Krasnoyarsk
References
1. Hobbes T. [Writings: 2 vol.]. Moscow, Mysl Publ., 1989, 624 p.
2. Locke J. [Writings: 3 vol]. Moscow, Mysl Publ., 1988, 669 p.
3. Antonov D.A. [Methodological features of studying the specifics of individualistic society life in Western philosophical theoretical concepts (on example of theories of social contract)]. Teoriya i praktika obshchetsvennogo razvitiya = Theory and practice of social development, 2011, no. 5, pp. 49–52. (In Russ.)
4. Rousseau J.-J. [Selected proceedings]. Moscow, Detskaya literatura Publ., 1976, 190 p.
5. Holbach P.A. [Selected proceedings: 2 vol.]. Moscow, Sotsekgiz Publ., 1963, 563 p.
6. Tarasov I. S. [Sunset of the national State]. Kosmopolis = Cosmopolice, 1999, pp. 77–89.
7. Pozdniakov E.A. [Nation. Nationalism. National interests]. Moscow, Progress-Kultura Publ., 1994.
8. Abdulatipov R. G. [Ethnicity and politics in Russia]. Moscow, Slavyanskiy dialog Publ., 2000. Chapter 3, 655 p.
9. Hellner E. [Nation and nationalism]. Мoscow, Progress Publ., 1991, 319 p.
10. Balibar E., Wallerstein I. [Race, nation, class. Ambiguous identity]. Moscow, Logos Publ., 2004, 288 p.
11. Walker Connor. «From Tribe to Nation». History of European Ideas Volume 13. New York, Pergamon, 1991.
12. Koh L.A. [On the conflict of global interests and national security of Russia]. Voennaya mysl = Military thought, 2011, no. 6, pp. 14–25. (In Russ.).
13. Rohrmoser G. [Crisis of liberalism]. Мoscow, Institute of philosophy of the Russian Academy of Sciences Press, 1996, 298 p.
14. Mildon V. I. [Still our XIX century]. Voprosy filosofii = Problems of Philosophy, 2006, no. 12, pp. 169–175. (In Russ.)
15. Evzerov R. Ia. [Population right for self-definition in the context of contemporary development]. Prepodavanie istorii i obshchestboznaniya = Teaching history and social studies, 2002, no. 5, pp. 5–11. (In Russ.)
16. Girenok f. [Pleasure to think otherwise]. Мoscow, Akademicheskiy proekt Publ., 2010, 235 p.
17. Shuper V.A. [Russia in the globalized world: alternatives for further development]. Voprosy filosofii = Problems of Philosophy, 2008, no.12, pp. 3–25.
18. Parshikov V. I. Nalivaiko N. V., Mayer B. [Trends in the development of national education (in terms of today»s global problems)]. Professionalnoe obrazovanie v sovremennom mire = Professional education in the modern world, 2012, no. 2 (5), pp. 3–9. (In Russ.)
19. Panarin V. I., Parshikov V. I., Chernykh S. I. [Humanitarian culture as a condition of education transformation]. Professionalnoe obrazovanie v sovremennom mire = Professional education in the modern world, 2016, no. 1 (20), pp. 34–40. (In Russ.)
20. Vatagina M. V. [Ensuring effective professional standards on the basis of integration processes in science, education and production in modern Russia]. Professionalnoe obrazovanie v sovremennom mire = Professional education in the modern world, 2017, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 1169–1178. (In Russ.)
21. Parshikov V. I., Tabakaev Iu. V., Krasnova N. N., Kuzmenko K.A. [Transformation of human rights and legal education]. Professionalnoe obrazovanie v sovremennom mire = Professional education in the modern world, 2017, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 1156–1162. (In Russ.).
22. Elazar D. J. Federal Sistems of the World. A Handbook of Federal, Confederal and Autonomy Arrangements. Essex, 1991, р. 11.
23. Bell D. Ethnicity and Social Change. Ethnicity. Theory and Experience. Cambridge (Mass), 1975, p. 172.
24. Enloe С. Police, military and ethnicity: Foundations of State power. New Brunswick, L.: Transaction Book, 1980, p. 10.
Supplementary files
For citation: Iatsenko M.P., Boyarskiy M.A. Features exploring the transformation of the nation state in the global world. Professional education in the modern world. 2018;8(4):2202-2211. https://doi.org/10.15372/PEMW20180408
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
