.png)
.png)
Email this article 
Marx’s socio-philosophical concept as a tool for forming the projective thinking and other input com-petencies from middle to higher humanitarian education
https://doi.org/10.15372/PEMW20180309
Abstract
The author analyzes and systematizes the reasons for the current revival of interest in Marxism, its research and prognostic potential. Against the background of this interest, the author raises the question of the degree of understanding of both the system of Marx»s views and other socio-philosophical concepts, and comes to a disappointing conclusion about the prevalence of profane interpretations of humanitarian knowledge in General and the system of views of the classics of Marxism in particular. The author gives several reasons for this situation. The school actually forms «input competences» for training in higher education institution. Among them, first, there is a significant social stratification, already established social groups with opposite interests and, accordingly, views on reality. While for some it is important to apply knowledge in the business process, for others it is a problem of lack of prospects and minimal social justice. Secondly, the quality of the perception of humanitarian knowledge is affected by the specifics of the presentation of materials in the school course of social studies: internal inconsistency, fragmentation and haphazardness. The article considers in detail some fragments of the educational material and identifies their shortcomings. The author emphasizes that they are determined not only by the work of the author»s team, but by the specificity of the perception of students whose research activity is at the initial stage of development and is focused on the empirical perception and analysis, not on the synthesis of theoretical knowledge. Based on his own teaching and research experience, the author examines the possible forms and directions of studying Marx social philosophy in high school. According to the author, Marx methodology, the beginning of which can be learned in high school, will be an excellent tool for training in high school, the formation of a number of «input competencies» necessary for training in a classical University. One of these competencies is the ability to target. The author draws attention to the fact that the goal is an element of the future in the present.
About the Author
A. P. SegalRussian Federation
PhD in Philosophy Sciences, researcher, Chair of Philosophy of Language and Communication, Faculty of Philosophy.
Training and Re-search Corps «Shuvalov», 1, Lenin Hills, Moscow, 119991
References
1. Mcluhan, Fiore, Quentin. [War and Peace in the Global Village]. Gingko Press, 2001, 192 с.
2. Standing G. [The Precariat: The New Dangerous Class]. N. Y.; L., Bloomsbury Academic, 2011, 192 с.
3. Toffler A. [Powershift: Knowledge, Wealth, and Violence at the Edge of the 21st Century]. N. Y.; L., Bantam books, 1990, 551 с.
4. Vaziulin V. A. [Formation of the method Of scientific research of K. Marx (logical aspect)]. Moscow, MSU Press Publ., 1975, 223 p.
5. Rosenthal M. M. [The Dialectic of K. Marx»s «Capital»]. Moscow, KRASAND Publ., 2010, 592 p.
6. Zinoviev A. A. [The ascent from the abstract to the concrete (by the material of K. Marx»s «Capital»]. Moscow, Ros. akad. nauk. In-t filosofii Publ., 2002, 319 p.
7. Baghaturia G. A. [To the question about the development of Marxist theory, the structural transformation of society]. Socialism-XXI. 14 texts of the post-Soviet school of critical Marxism. Moscow, Kult. revolutsiya Publ., 2009.
8. Ilyenkov E. V. [The dialectics of the abstract and the concrete in scientific-theoretical thinking]. Moscow, Rus. Polit. entsikl. (ROSSPEN), 1997, 95 p.
9. Vaziulin V. A. [The Problems of the theory of socio-economic formations in the works of K. Marx (historical aspect)]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta = Bulletin of Moscow University. Series 7: Philosophy, 1983, pp. 14–24. (In Russian)
10. Vaziulin V. A. [The logics of history. Issues of theory and methodology]. Moscow, MSU Press Publ., 1988.
11. Vaziulin V. A. [Logics of Marx»s Capital]. Moscow, MSU Press Publ., 1968, 293 pp.
12. [Conference «Logic of «Capital» and understanding of cotemporary society»]. Faculty of Philosophy of Moscow state University, 2018. Available at: http://philos.msu.ru/node/1956 (accessed July 01, 2018).
13. [Youth round table «How and why to study Marx?»]. International scientific conference of students, postgraduates and young scientists «Lomonosov-2018». 2018. Available at: https://lomonosov-msu.ru/rus/event/schedule/331#3761 (accessed July 01, 2018).
14. [Fresh «pearl» from Sergei Schmidt: Teleinform News Agency publishes a collection of curiosities from the exam2017 in social science]. IA «Teleinform». 2017. Available at: http://i38.ru/obrazovanie-pervie/svezhaya-perlovka-otsergeya-shmidta-teleinform-publikuet-kollektsiiu-kurezov-s-ege-po-obschestvoznaniiu (accessed June 28, 2018).
15. Smith A. An Inquiry Into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations (1776). Vol 1. London, The Electric Book Company Ltd Publ., 1998.
16. Castells M. Democracy in the age of the Internet. The Institut Ramon Llull. Catalan culture abroad. 2010. Available at: https://llull.cat/IMAGES_175/transfer06-not01.pdf (accessed July 13, 2018).
17. Bogolyubov L. N., Lazebnikova A. Yu., Smirnova N. M. [Social Studies: advanced level]: Textbook for the 10th grade of educational institutions. Moscow, Prosvesheniye Publ., 2007, 416 p.
18. Bogolyubov L. N., Lazebnikova A. Yu., Kinkulkin A. T. [Social Studies]. 11th grade: Textbook for General education institutions: the advanced level. Moscow, Prosvesheniye Publ., 2014, 432 p.
19. Marks K. [Economic Manuscripts 1857–1859 (The original version of Capital)]. Vol. 46, part II, 1969.
20. Marx K. Das Elend der Philosophie. Antwort auf Proudhons «Philosophie des Elends». Vol MEW, 4. Berlin: Dietz Verlag, 1960. (In German)
21. Lenin V. I. [Karl Marx (a Brief biographical sketch with an exposition of Marxism)]. July – November 1914. Vol. 26. Lenin V. I. Complete works. Moscow: IPL Publ., 1969, pp. 43–93.
22. Lenin V. I. [Three sources and three components of Marxism]. March 1913. Vol. 23. Lenin V. I. Complete works. Moscow: IPL Publ., 1973, pp. 40–48.
23. Marx K. [Reflections of a young man in choosing a profession]. Marx K., Engels F. From the early works. Moscow, State publishing house of political literature Publ., 1956, pp. 1–5.
24. Marx K. [A letter to Father]. Marx K., Engels F. From the early works. Moscow: State publishing house of political literature, 1956, pp. 6–16.
25. Marx K. [Debates of the sixth Rhine Landtag (article three). The debate about the law on theft of forest]. Marx K., Engels F. Works. Moscow, IPL Publ., 1955, vol. 1, pp. 119–160.
26. Marx K. MEGA. Capital. Critique of Political Economy. Erster Band, Hamburg, 1890. BERLIN, DIETZ VERLAG Publ., 1991, vol. 10, 1288 p.
27. Koshel V. A., Segal A. P. [Logic of Capital And understanding of contemporary society]. Credo New, 2018, no. 3 (95). (In Russian)
28. Marx K. [The sketches of the response to a letter from V. I. Zasulich]. Marx K., Engels F. Collected works. Essays. Moscow, IPL Publ., 1961, vol. 19, pp. 400–421.
29. Marx K. [Capital]. 1960. Essays. Moscow, IPL Publ., 1960, vol. 23, 908 pp.
Supplementary files
For citation: Segal A.P. Marx’s socio-philosophical concept as a tool for forming the projective thinking and other input com-petencies from middle to higher humanitarian education. Professional education in the modern world. 2018;8(3):2032-2042. https://doi.org/10.15372/PEMW20180309
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
