Social norms in society as the integral factor of formation and estimation of reputation of the individual




Abstract

One of the problems in a research of reputation which rises before experts of different areas is a search of factors of formation and criteria for evaluation of valuable characteristics of the subjects as individualized and collective. So, for example, experts in the field of the game theory hold the opinion that there are game-theoretic models of reputation and norm of activity, and the reputation, in their research is, somewhat, a reflection over norm of activity. In this the task to consider social norms, first, as a factor of formation of reputation, secondly – as a factor of assessment of the subject is set. During education, socialization, vocational training there is an interiozation ("absorption") of the standard social norms, formation of systems of values and certain behavior models that affects activity of the subject. On the basis of the analysis of activity of the subject it is possible to judge reputation. The concept "reputation" has polysemantic character. It allows us to say about reputation, on the one hand, as about the become phenomenon, the developed system of estimates and valuable characteristics, with another – as about process of formation of such estimates and characteristics. In the latter case it turns out that "reputation" as a procedural concept turns to us in the form of process of search of valuable characteristics of subjects and results of their activity. In this context about it it is possible to speak as about process of making decision on what assessment to give to activity of the subject. In article it will be shown that compliance or discrepancy of activity of the subject to the standard social norms, and also valuable preferences of the estimating subject appears one of fundamental factors for making decision on reputation of the estimated subject as individualized, and collective.


About the Authors

Yuliya Kryukova
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation
Tutor of Department of philosophy of language and communication, Lomonosov Moscow State University


Галина Сорина
Московский государственный университет имени М.В. Ломоносова
Russian Federation


References

1. Kryukova Yu. E. [Stages of formation and the subsequent development of problems of reputation: social and philosophical analysis] Etapyi formirovaniya i posleduyuschego razvitiya problem reputatsii: sotsialno-filosofskiy analiz // Kontekst i refleksiya: filosofiya o mire i cheloveke. — 2016. — # 4. — S. 20-36. Available at: http://publishing-vak.ru/file/archive-philosophy-2016-4/2-kryukova.pdf (accessed June, 2018).

2. Kryukova Yu. E. [Reputation: etymology and search of the social and philosophical bases of the analysis] Reputatsiya: etimologiya i poisk sotsialno-filosofskih osnovaniy analiza [Elektronnyiy resurs] // Elektronnoe nauchnoe izdanie Almanah «Prostranstvo i vremya». 2015. # 3(21). C. 134-137. ISSN 22119 – 4525. Available at: http://www.space-time.ru/assets/files/Print_Journal_PDF_2015/2226-7271provr_st3-21.2015.43.pdf (accessed June, 2018).

3. Momdzhyan K. H. [Decision-making process and its place in activity of people]. Protsess prinyatiya resheniy i ego mesto v deyatelnosti lyudey [Elektronnyiy resurs] // Elektronnoe nauchnoe izdanie Almanah «Prostranstvo i Vremya». 2015. T.9. #2. Available at: http://istina.msu.ru/media/publications/article/503/9b6/15382897/2227-9490e-aprovr_e-ast9-2.2015.32.pdf (accessed June, 2018).

4. Nazarova Yu.V. [Axiology of parliamentary culture and anthropological practicians]. Aksiologiya parlamentskoy kulturyi i antropologicheskie praktiki: Monogr. / Yu. V. Nazarova. – Tula: Izd-vo Tul. gos. ped. un-ta im. L. N. Tolstogo, 2013. – 223 s.

5. Ustinova N.V. [Political reputation: essence, features, technologies of formation]. Politicheskaya reputatsiya: suschnost, osobennosti, tehnologii formirovaniya. Diss. … k. polit. n. — Ekaterinburg, 2005. — 166 s.

6. Solkina P.A. [Social norms and their realization in life of society]. Sotsialnyie normyi i ih realizatsii v zhizni obschestva: avtoref. diss. ...kand. filosof. nauk. — Krasnoyarsk, 2012. — 127 c

7. Momov V. V. [Morals and right]. Moral i pravo. — M.: Znanie. 1974. — S.9-10.

8. Kochetkova A. V., Filippov V. N., Skvortsov Ya. L., Tarasov A. S. [Theory and practice of public relations]. Teoriya i praktika svyazey s obschestvennostyu. — SPb.: Piter, 2009. — S. 197–229.

9. [Criminal Code of the Russian Federation]. Ugolovnyiy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii ot 13.06.1996 g. # 63-FZ (red. ot 28.04.2015 g.) // Sobranie zakonodatelstva RF. 1996. # 25. —St. 2954.

10. [Civil code of the Russian Federation]. Grazhdanskiy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii: Chast pervaya – chetvertaya: [Prinyat Gos. Dumoy 23 aprelya 1994 goda, s izmeneniyami i dopolneniyami po sostoyaniyu na 10 aprelya 2009 g.] // Sobranie zakonodatelstva RF. – 1994. – # 22. St. 2457.

11. Sorina G.V. [Decision-making as intellectual activity]. Prinyatie resheniy kak intellektualnaya deyatelnost. Monografiya. — M.: «Kanon », «Reabilitatsiya», 2009. — S.175-180

12. Rozanov I. N. [Literary reputations]. Literaturnyie reputatsii. — M.: Sovetskiy pisatel, 1990 — 464 s.

13. Sokolov M. M. [7 facts about value and sources of intra professional judgment in the academic environment]. 7 faktov o znachenii i istochnikah vnutriprofessionalnogo suzhdeniya v akademicheskoy srede. Available at: http://postnauka.ru/faq/6451 (accessed June, 2018).

14. [Dictionary]. Slovar Dic.academic.ru. Available at: https://dic.academic.ru/dic.nsf/business/20376 (accessed June, 2018).

15. Mironov V. V. [Naukometriya as kind of madness]. Naukometriya kak raznovidnost bezumiya. Zhurnal «Sokrat». 2016 (09). — S.8-12.

16. Grahame Dowling. [Creating Corporate Reputations]. Reputatsiya firmyi: sozdanie, upravlenie i otsenka effektivnosti: Per. s angl. — M.: Konsaltingovaya gruppa «IMIDZh-Kontakt»: INFRA-M, 2003. — XXVI, 368 s. — (Seriya «Sovremennyie konsaltingovyie tehnologii»).

17. Bobneva M. I. [Social norms and regulation of behavior]. Sotsialnyie normyi i regulyatsiya povedeniya. — M: Nauka, 1978. — S. 4

18. Segal A.P. [Image – anything, reputation – already something]. Imidzh – nichto, reputatsiya – uzhe koe-chto. // So-Obschenie. – 2003. – # 4. – S. 49-52. Available at: http://www.soob.ru/n/2003/4/practice/5 (accessed June, 2018).

19. Emile Durkheim. [Sociology: Its subject, method, mission]. Sotsiologiya: Ee predmet, metod, prednaznachenie. — M.: Kanon, 1995. — S. 154.

20. Anna Kostikova, Alexander Segal, Galina Sorina & Sergey Spartak (2017) Big Data: a loop or a challenge for human morality: mapping Russian tradition in philosophy and methodology, Russian Journal of Communication. Available at: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/19409419.2017.1376533 (accessed June, 2018).


Supplementary files

For citation: Kryukova Y., . Social norms in society as the integral factor of formation and estimation of reputation of the individual. Professional education in the modern world. 2018;8(3).

Views: 330

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2224-1841 (Print)