NEW EDUCATIONAL PRACTICES IN THE LIGHT OF THE COMMUNICATIVE APPROACH


https://doi.org/10.15372/PEMW20170306

Full Text:




Abstract

The article is devoted to the modern approach to the question of the psychological peculiarities of the process of educational interaction. The authors describe the processes and learning outcomes in the context of didactic communication. A student is a personality who is actively involved in educational interaction. A teacher is an instructor and organizer of educational environment who controls students’ activity.. The authors discuss new and traditional educational practices aimed at making the process of didactic communication more effective. The article is also dedicated to learning myths, analysis of motivational, intellectual, and interactive learning resources. The authors describe the main aspects aimed at students’ development, their inner world and expressions, possibilities and restrictions.


About the Authors

P. V. Menshikov
Kaluga state University them. K. E. Tsiolkovskiy.
Russian Federation

associate Professor, candidate of psychological Sciences Institute of psychology, Department of psychology  of development and education.

Kaluga.



M. R. Arpentieva
Kaluga state University them. K. E. Tsiolkovskiy.
Russian Federation

 Doctor the course of studies. Sciences, associate Professor, Professor Institute of psychology, Department of psychology  of development and education.

Kaluga.



References

1. Arpentieva M. R. Tekhnologii glubinnogo i poverkhnostnogo obucheniya: vozmozhnosti i ogranicheniya [Technology of deep and surface learning: opportunities and restrictions]. Novye razvivayushchie tekhnologii pedagogicheskoy praktiki [New educational technologies of pedagogical practices]. Ulyanovsk, Zebra Publ., 2016. pp. 215–229.

2. Benka М., Chancharevich-Dzhordzhevich V. [Engaged in the teacher – to challenge and inspire students. Presentation]. Transl. from Serbian P. V. Menshikov. Arilje: Sant Akhil School Publ., 2013. 25 pp.

3. Arpentieva M. R., Menshikov, P. V., Moiseeva T. V. Didakticheskya kommunikatsiya: umenie uchitsya i umenie uchit [Didactic communication: the ability to learn and the ability to teach]. Kaluga, KSU Publ., 2017. 353 pp. 3. Verbitsky A. A. Aktivnoe obuchenie v vysshey shkole [Active learning in higher institution]. Moscow, Vysshaya shkola Publ., 1991. 228 pp.

4. Glasser W. Shkoly bez neudachnikov [Schools without losers]. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1990. 120 pp.

5. Menshikov P. V. Psikhologiya uchebnogo vzaimodeystviya [Psychology of educational interaction]. Kaluga, Kaluga State University Press., 2014. 172 pp.

6. Menshikov P. V. [«The Concept of exposure to» educational psychological explication]. Psikhologiya v vuze = Psychology in University, 2012, no. 4. pp. 37–45. (In Russ).

7. Minigalieva M. R. Izuchenie psikhologii i samopoznanie studentov [Study of Psychology and students’ selfknowledge]. Saarbrucken: LAP Publ., 2012. 632 рp. (In Russian).

8. [Guide to work in the field of adult education. For teachers, Functioning adult basic education]. Ed. by T. Urze, J. Markovic, for. M. Yakovlevich. Belgrade: Project «Second chance», GOPA consultants (GOPA Consultants) d ART.o.o. 2006, 80 pp. (In Serbian).

9. Stankovich D. [The Inclusion of teachers in school development]. Proceedings of Institute of pedagogical studies. 2009, vol. 41, no. 2. pp. 315–330. (In Serbian).

10. Chirjakovich I. [Active learning]. Presentation. Transl. from Serbian. Arilje: Sant Akhil School Publ., 2013.20 p. (In Serbian, in Russian).

11. Barth R.S. [Teacher Leader]. Phi Delta Kappan, 2001, vol. 82. pp. 443–449.

12. Entvistle N. [Styles of learning and teaching]. N. Y., Willey & Sons, 1981. 293 p.

13. Harris A. & Muijs D. [Teacher leadership: principles and practice]. Nottingham: NCSL Publ., 2003. 240 p.

14. Kuzmanovićh B. [Motivational basis of the relationship to self-management and participation in selfmanagement]. Psychological research, 1984, B. 3, B. 465–546. (In Croatian).

15. Kuzmanovićh B. [The inclusion of teachers in the development of the school. Social changes and changes in the value orientations of students]. Psychological research, 1995, Vol. 7. pp. 17–47. (In Croatian).

16. Lortie D. [Schoolteacher: a sociological study]. Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 2002.

17. Maslowski R. [School culture and school performance]. Twente: Twente University Press Publ., 2001. 260 р.

18. Tochon F. V. [Deep Education]. Journal for Educators Teachers and Trainers, 2010, Vol. 1. pp. 1–12.

19. Watkins D. A. [Learning and teaching: A cross-cultural perspective]. School Leadership & Management, 2000, no. 20(2). рp. 161–173.

20. Wawrzyniuk D. [The Art of being a teacher]. School Life, 2003, no. 8.pp. 78–79. (In Polish).

21. Zukowska Z. [Teacher: man, teacher, specialist]. Physical Education and health, 1993, no. 4. pp. 114. (In Polish).


Supplementary files

For citation: Menshikov P.V., Arpentieva M.R. NEW EDUCATIONAL PRACTICES IN THE LIGHT OF THE COMMUNICATIVE APPROACH. Professional education in the modern world. 2017;7(3):1179-1185. https://doi.org/10.15372/PEMW20170306

Views: 467

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2224-1841 (Print)