SIGNIFICANCE OF INTEGRATED METHODOLOGY IN PHILOSOPHY OF LAW, CONSTITUTIONAL LEGISLATION AND LEGAL EDUCATION

Iu. V. Tabakaev; N. N. Krasnova; K. A. Kuzmenko

SIGNIFICANCE OF INTEGRATED METHODOLOGY IN PHILOSOPHY OF LAW, CONSTITUTIONAL LEGISLATION AND LEGAL EDUCATION

Iu. V. Tabakaev, N. N. Krasnova, K. A. Kuzmenko

Full Text:

Abstract

Modern society is a very complex system. Its management is carried out with the help of political and legal system, the center of which is state power. The state power in its activity rests on the existing legislation, the core of which is the constitutional legislation. The basis of the constitutional legislation of Russia is the Constitution of the Russian Federation. This means that the most important changes in the legal reality of the country, one way or another, concern its Basic Law, or the Constitution. Since most of the current changes in the legal reality and its conceptual core– the constitutional legislation– are of a complex systemic nature, an adequate complex methodology is needed to study these phenomena. It can be successfully implemented in the philosophy of law, the theory of state and law, in the study of constitutional legislation. This methodology is based on the priority of the whole with respect to the part and includes several interrelated approaches: dialectical, systemic, structural-functional, global (systemecological), comparative, structural-organizational. It is based on the theoretical basis of synthetic dualism. Legal education requires the training of specialists of the appropriate profile.

Keywords

philosophy of law, constitutional legislation, legal education, integrated methodology, basic methodological approaches,

About the Authors

Iu. V. Tabakaev

Gorno-Altaisk state University
Russian Federation
Doctor Philosophical Sc., Professor, the Head of the Chair of Philosophy and Law at Gorny Altay State University

N. N. Krasnova

Gorno-Altaisk state University
Russian Federation
PhD-student at the Chair of Philosophy and Law at Gorny Altay State University

K. A. Kuzmenko

Bar Association of the Altai territory
Russian Federation
lawyer at the Altai Territory Advocates Chamber

References

1. Ushakova E.V. [Partiality and holism in modern science and education]. Filosofiya obrazovaniya = Philosophy of Education, 2008, no. 3 (24). pp. 41–48 (in Russ).

2. Nalivayko N.V., Ushakova E.V. [Review of the book written by Professor V.N. Nikitenko “Holism and Education”]. Filosofiya obrazovaniya = Philosophy of Education, 2016, no. 6. pp. 170–176 (in Russ).

3. Parshikov V. I. [Actual issues of the development of national professional education]. Professionalnoe obrazovanie v sovremennom mire = Professional education in the modern world, 2012, no. 1. pp. 3–8 (in Russ).

4. Kulipanova N.V., Orlova N.P., Ushakova E.V., Parshikov V. I., Nalivayko N.V. [Philosophy of law and the philosophy of education: cognitive-practical aspects of interaction]. Professionalnoe obrazovanie v sovremennom mire = Professional education in the modern world, 2011, no. 3. pp.16–25 (in Russ).

5. The Constitution of the Russian Federation (amended on December 30, 2008) Consultant Plus. Available at: 10/03/2013 / www.consultant.ru

6. Avakian S.A. Konstitutsiya Rossii: priroda, evolyutsiya, sovremennost [The Constitution of Russia: nature, evolution and current situation]. Moscow, “Sashko” Publ., 2000. 528 p.

7. Iatsenko M.P. [Globalization as a form of organization of the historical process: nature and problems] Professionalnoe obrazovanie v sovremennom mire = Professional education in the modern world, 2011, no. 1. pp.53–59 (in Russ).

8. Panarin V. I. [Review of the monograph “Transition in the system of social and natural existence: a philosophical and methodological analysis”]. Professionalnoe obrazovanie v sovremennom mire = Professional education in the modern world, 2015, no. 2. pp.197–198 (in Russ).

9. Alekseev S.S. Obshchaya teoriya prava [General theory of law]. Moscow, Yurid. Literatura Publ., 1982. 360 p.

10. Iudin E.G. Sistemnyy podhod i printsip deyatelnosti: metodologicheskie problem sovremennoy nauki [The system approach and the principle of activity: the methodological problems of modern science]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1978. 391 p.

11. Nikiforov A.L. Filosofiya nauki: istoriya i metodologiya [Philosophy of Science: history and methodology]. Moscow, 1998. 280 p.

12. Sukharev V.E. Bolshoy yuridicheskiy slovar. Pravovaya metodologiya [Large legal dictionary. Legal methodology]. Moscow, Infra-M Publ., 2001. 703 p.

13. Tikhomirov Iu.A. Teoriya zakona [Theory of Law]. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1982. 257 p.

14. Syrykh V.M., Tikhomirov Iu.A. Effektivnost zakona: metodologiya i konkretnye issledovaniya [Effect of the law: methodology and case studies]. Moscow, BEK Press, 1997. 211 p.

15. Khabrieva T. Ia., Chirkin V.E. Teoriya sovremennoy konstitutsii [Theory of the modern constitution]. Moscow, Norma Publ., 2007. 319 р.

16. Huntington S. The Clash of Civilizations.– Moscow: AST, 2015.– 576 p.

Supplementary files

For citation: Tabakaev I.V., Krasnova N.N., Kuzmenko K.A. SIGNIFICANCE OF INTEGRATED METHODOLOGY IN PHILOSOPHY OF LAW, CONSTITUTIONAL LEGISLATION AND LEGAL EDUCATION. Professional education in the modern world. 2017;7(2):985-990.

Refbacks

There are currently no refbacks.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

ISSN 2224-1841 (Print)

Username
Password