STYLISTIC PECULIARITIES OF INTELLECTUAL ACTIVITY OF STUDENTS OF HUMANITIES AND TECHNICAL MAJORS AND THEIR INCORPORATION INTO PEDAGOGICAL PRACTICE

Full Text:




Abstract

The article raises the question about specific features in cognitive structures of students who focus on Technical and Humanities majors. The paper outlines the specific role of psychological and pedagogical subjects in solving the tasks aimed at intellectual education. The topic is relevant in the view of psychology of personal constructs developed by J.Kelly. The research material was obtained by means of application repertoire lattice of Kelly where the elements assume the role list and elements differentiation – personality constructs by means of triads method. The article analyzes the data obtained on two groups of students of Humanities majors and Technical ones. The author reveals specific features of constructs differentiation and their relation with each other. The paper outlines the necessity to consider students’ selective perception and conceptual lean as they are influenced by their former life experience.


About the Authors

N. N. Nesterovich
Novosibirsk Humanitarian Institute, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation
Russian Federation

Candidate of Pedagogics, Associate Professor at the Chair of Pedagogics and Psychology at Novosibirsk Humanitarian Institute (23 Sovetskaya Str., 630099 Novosibirsk



B. V. Fedotov
Novosibirsk State Agrarian University, Novosibirsk, Russian Federation
Russian Federation

Сandidate of History, Associate Professor at the Chair of Technologies of Education, Pedagogics and Psychology of Engineering Institute of Novosibirsk State Agrarian University (147 Nikitins Str., 630039 Novosibirsk



References

1. Sergeev S. F. [Tools of learning environment: learning styles]. Shkolnye tehnologii = School technologies, 2010, no. 5. pp. 19–27 (in Russ).

2. Meskov V. S., Mamchenko A. A. [Education for knowledge societies: cognitive and competency-based paradigm of educational processes]. Tsennosti i smysly = Values and meaning, 2010, no. 4. pp. 46–62 (in Russ).

3. Sitnikova M. A. [The dynamics of the world image of modern students] Nauchnye vedomosti Belgorodskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Gumanitarnye nauki = Bulletin of Belgorod State University. Series: Humanities, 2015, Vol. 25, no. 6 (203). pp. 193–203 (in Russ).

4. Filatova G. E. [The formation of students’ life-meaningful orientations when teaching Psychology and Pedagogics at technical University]. Trudy RGUPS = Proceedings of RSTU, 2014, no. 1. pp. 164–170 (in Russ).

5. Kamenskih D. V. [The dichotomy of “integrality – differentsialnoi” as a cross-cutting feature of cognitive style]. Aktualnye problemy gumanitarnyh i estestvennyh nauk = Relevant problems of Humanities and Natural Sciences, 2015, no. 1–2. pp. 200– 203(in Russ).

6. Kelli Dzh. A. Psikhologiya lichnosti. Teoriya lichnostnyh konstruktov [Psychology of personality. The theory of personal constructs]. St.Petersburg, “Rech” Publ., 2000.

7. Levitskaia I. A. [The theory of personal constructs J. Kelly: towards a cognitive philosophy of education]. Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo universiteta im. N. I. Lobachevskogo. Ser. «Sotsialnyie nauki» = Bulletin of Nizhny Novgorod University named after Lobachevsky. Series: Social Sciences, 2013, no. 2 (30). pp. 114–119 (in Russ).

8. Shtern V. Differentsialnaya psikhologiya i ee metodicheskie osnovy [Differential psychology and its methodological foundations]. Moscow, “Nauka” Publ., 1998.

9. Vygotskiy L. S. Problema kulturnogo razvitiya rebenka [The problem of cultural development of a child]. Psikhologiya razvitiya cheloveka [Psychology of human development]. Moscow, 2005.

10. Tarakhurina M. I., Iontseva M. V. [Repertoire lattice of Kelly]. Sotsiologiya: 4M = Sociology: 4M., 1997, no. 8. pp. 114–138 (in Russ).

11. Kholodnaia M. Kognitivnye stili. O prirode individualnogo uma [Cognitive styles. The nature of the individual mind]. St.Petersburg, “Piter” Publ., 2004.

12. Gregors A. R. Style delineator. Maynard, MA: Gabriel Systems, 1982.


Supplementary files

For citation: Nesterovich N.N., Fedotov B.V. STYLISTIC PECULIARITIES OF INTELLECTUAL ACTIVITY OF STUDENTS OF HUMANITIES AND TECHNICAL MAJORS AND THEIR INCORPORATION INTO PEDAGOGICAL PRACTICE. Professional education in the modern world. 2016;6(3):469-473.

Views: 469

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2224-1841 (Print)