The coenological matrix of the World: God does not play dice


https://doi.org/10.20913/2224-1841-2025-3-3

Full Text:




Abstract

Introduction. Coenology is a scientific field that studies coenoses of different nature, was founded by Professor B. I. Kudrin of Moscow Power Engineering Institute about 40 years ago. Since then, coenology has spread to many fields of knowledge. During this time, researchers have accumulated a lot of empirical material, which required generalization at the theoretical level, which determined the relevance of the stated topic. 20 years later, B. I. Kudrin formulated a new coenological paradigm: "...there is a common structure of coenoses of any nature ... the world is described by models of H-distribution...". The article is devoted to its justification. Purpose setting. Setting tasks are: 1) generalization and analysis of the results of the study of coenoses of different natures of living and inanimate matter, the objects of which form hyperbolic rank H-distributions (GRR) by parameters or compositions; 2) classification of GRR by scale levels; 3) substantiation of the deterministic process of self-organization of coenoses into a hierarchical multilevel system and the formation of a coenological matrix of the World. Methodology and methods of the study. The specific methods are: 1) coenological rank analysis – graphic construction of GRR of the objects of coenoses by means of computer programs and approximation of them by hyperbolic function; 2) assessing the closeness of the correlation of GRR from different scale levels by means of Pearson’s method. The general methods are: induction, deduction, analogy, modeling. Results. The conducted coenological rank analysis indicates the determinism of the process of self-organization of coenoses of different nature at all scale levels. A paired comparison of GRR of different nature from various levels from deep space to the microcosm and societies by the Pearson’s method showed a high degree of their correlation with each other, which proves the self-organization of coenoses according to hierarchies into a multilevel fractal megasystem, which is considered by the author as a coenological matrix of the World (the scheme is presented). Conclusion. 1) B.I. Kudrin’s coenological paradigm is proved: "The world is described by H-distribution models"; 2) The analysis of the results allows us to consider the existence of a coenological matrix of the World as scientifically justified.


About the Author

R. V. Gurina
Ulyanovsk State University
Russian Federation

Roza V. Gurina – doctor of pedagogical sciences, associate professor, professor of the department of physical methods
in applied research, Faculty of Engineering and Physics of High Technologies

42 L. Tolstogo str., Ulyanovsk, 432000, Russian Federation



References

1. Kudrin B. I. Introduction to Technetics. Tomsk, Publishing house of Tomsk State University, 1991, 384 p. (In Russ.)

2. Kudrin B. I. Technogenic Self-organization. For Electrical Engineers and Philosophers. Issue 25. "Cenological Studies". Moscow, Center for Systems Research, 2004, 248 p. (In Russ.)

3. Popov M. H. Terminological dictionary of technetics. Issue 42. "Cenological research". Moscow, Technetika Publ., 2009, 396 p. (In Russ.)

4. Dylis N. V. Fundamentals of biogeocenology. Moscow, Moscow Publishing House. unita, 1978, 152 p. (In Russ.)

5. Gnatyuk V. I. Optimal Construction of Technocenoses. Theory and Practice. Issue 9. "Cenological Studies". Moscow, Center for Systems Research, 1999, 272 p. (In Russ.)

6. Fufaev V. V., Chentsov S. V., Lamansky M. G. Cenological analysis of the structure of the banking system of Russia. Technogenic self-organization and mathematical apparatus of cenological research. Cenological research. Issue 28. Moscow, Center for Systems Research, 2005, pp. 310–320. (In Russ.)

7. Shchapova Y. L., Grinchenko S. N. The oldest technocenoses: the Stone Age. Cenological vision of communities of material and ideal realities: the fundamental nature of theory and the universality of practice. Cenological research. Issue 53. Moscow, Technetika Publ., 2014, pp. 422–431. (In Russ.)

8. Trubnikova O. B. The effectiveness of assisted reproductive technology of IVF and the degree of maturity of embryocenosis. Proceedings of the XXII meeting-seminar of cenologists (Moscow, NRU MEI, 11/16/2018) Cenological research. Issue 59. St. Petersburg, XI-Print Publ., 2019, pp. 76–81. (In Russ.)

9. Sheinin A.A. Management of human motor activity using rank analysis. Proceedings of the XXII meeting-seminar of cenologists (Moscow, NRU MEI, 11/16/2018). Cenological research. Issue 59. St. Petersburg, XI-Print Publ., 2019, pp. 210–217. (In Russ.)

10. Gurina R. V., Evseev D. A. Rank Analysis, or Cenological Approach, in the Methodology of Applied Research: monograph. Ulyanovsk, USU, 2018, 287 p. (In Russ.)

11. Gurina R. V. Cenological Principle of Self-organization of Cosmic Matter: God Doesn't Play Dice. Physical Education in Universities, 2021, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 13–27. (In Russ.)

12. Gurina R.V., Dyatlova M. V., Khaibullov R. A. Rank analysis of astrophysical and physical systems. Kazan science, 2010, no. 2, pp. 8–11. (In Russ.)

13. Gurina R. V. Space systems as astrocenoses. Proceedings of the XV Conference on the Philosophy of Technology and Technetics and the seminar on Cenology (Moscow, MEI, November 19, 2010). Issue 47. Moscow, Technetika Publ., 2011, pp. 178–185. (In Russ.)

14. Gurina R. V., Morozova E. V. Cenology – the doctrine of cenoses of different nature. Educational technologies, 2020, no. 1, pp. 40–49. (In Russ.)

15. Gurina R. V., Ribenek V. A., Tertyshnikova G. V. Investigation of rank-species distributions of exoplanetary systems. Physical, mathematical and natural science education: science and school: materials of the All-Russian scientific and practical conference of teachers of higher and secondary schools. Yoshkar-Ola, 2021, pp. 128–135. (In Russ.)

16. Gurina R. V., Sharipova K. V. Artificial space debris as a technocenosis. Opto-, nanoelectronics, nanotechnology and microsystems: works of 18th International Conference. Edited by N. S. V. Boyarsky. Ulyanovsk, UlSU, 2015, pp. 265–266. (In Russ).

17. Gurina R. V. Rank Analysis of Educational Systems (Cenological Approach): Methodological Recommendations for Education Workers. Cenological Studies. Issue 32. Moscow, Technetika Publ., 2006, 40 p. (In Russ).

18. Gurina R. V. Cenological Studies of Pedagogical Educational Systems. Polzunov Bulletin, 2004, no. 3, pp. 133–138. (In Russ.)

19. Gurina R. V., Leontieva L. N., Kosheva V. V. The method of graphical rank analysis in the study of ratings of educational institutions. Professional education in the modern world, 2022, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 211–220. (In Russ.)

20. Gurina R. V., Lizyaeva V. V. Fractal self-organization of educational systems in hyperbolic rank distributions. Professional education in the modern world, 2024, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 210–221. (In Russ.)

21. Gurina R. V., Lizyaeva V. V. Cenological self-organization of educational systems. Fedorov readings. 2023: materials of the All-Russian scientific and practical conference with international participation. Under the general editorship of Yu. V. Matyunina. Moscow, Publishing House of MEI, 2023, pp. 451–460. (In Russ.)

22. Gurina R. V., Morozova E. V., Kosheva V. V. Rank Analysis in Assessing the Validity of Olympiad Tasks. Professional education in the modern world, 2020, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 4302–4309. (In Russ.)

23. Sidorneko E. V. Methods of Mathematical Processing in Psychology. St. Petersburg, Rech Publ., 2002, 350 p. (In Russ.)

24. Planck M. German “Das Wesen der Materie. (German) [The nature of matter],” Speech in Florence, Italy, recorded in Archiv zur Geschichte der Max-Planck-Gesellschaft, Abt. Va, Rep. 11 (1944). URL: https://www.informationphilosopher.com/solutions/scientists/planck/ (accessed 10.29.2024) (In German).

25. Dictionary of Russian synonyms. URL: sin.slovaronline.com "74724-maprica. (accessed 10.29.2024) (In Russ.)

26. Ozhegov S. I., Shvedova N. Yu. Explanatory dictionary of the Russian language. RAO. The Vinogradov Institute of the Russian Language. 4th ed., supplemented. Moscow, Azbukovnik Publ., 1997, 944 p. (In Russ.)

27. Kalugin I. K. English-Russian dictionary of modern radio electronics. Moscow, Soviet Encyclopedia Publ., 1972, 448 p. (In Russ.)

28. English-Russian physical dictionary. Ed. D. M. Tolstoy. Moscow, Soviet Encyclopedia Publ., 1972, 848 p. (In Russ.)

29. Zaichenko M. A., Latypova G. M. The principle of recursion in the humanities and natural sciences. Karelian Scientific Journal, 2014, no. 1, pp. 27–30. (In Russ.)

30. System. Symmetry. Harmony. Edited by V. S. Tyukhtin, Yu. A. Urmantsev. Moscow, Mysl Publ., 1988, 315 [2] p. (In Russ.)


Supplementary files

For citation: Gurina R.V. The coenological matrix of the World: God does not play dice. Professional education in the modern world. 2025;15(3):452 –463. https://doi.org/10.20913/2224-1841-2025-3-3

Views: 1

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2224-1841 (Print)