The use of generative neural network assistants in the educational process: threats and new opportunities


https://doi.org/10.20913/2618-7515-2025-2-12

Full Text:




Abstract

Introduction. Increasingly, teachers and students are using generative neural network assistants that transform the educational environment. Purpose setting. The article discusses AI services: GigaChat, YandexGPT, ChatGPT, DeepSeek. The purpose of our research is to identify new opportunities and threats related to their use in education. Methodology and methods of the study. The following methods were used: monographic, system analysis, statistical, including surveys, summary, grouping, calculation of relative values. The authors analyzed the features of using the services in question: the tariff, the target audience, and the availability on the territory of the Russian Federation. Two statistical studies have been conducted in the form of surveys on the use of generative neural network assistants by teachers and students of four Russian universities. Results. The functions of generative neural network assistants that are relevant for education are listed, which are more often used by students than by teachers. This is confirmed by the conducted statistical study: only 47.96 % of teachers in 2025. Generative neural network assistants were used, while first – year undergraduate students accounted for 82.05 %, and senior and graduate students accounted for 100 %. Our second study shows problems in recognizing the generated text. The authors see the following threats to the use of generative neural network assistants: the presence of «hallucinations» in services that are not always recognized by students; insufficient assimilation of the material studied; decreased emotional intelligence, the ability to learn, and develop critical thinking. Although the analysis of publications shows that some of the authors disagree with this and advocate the cybernization of consciousness, predicting that neural interfaces will eliminate these threats. Another consequence of using generative neural network assistants is a reduction in cognitive load. Scientists disagree on whether this is a good thing or a bad thing. On the one hand, this will help to avoid professional burnout and overload in humans, and on the other hand, it will weaken mental abilities, passive consumption of information, and degradation of existing skills. Generative neural network assistants are changing the educational environment, and only teachers with AI competencies can minimize the risks of such a transformation.


About the Authors

A. A. Aletdinova
Novosibirsk State Agrarian University
Russian Federation

Anna A. Aletdinova – doctor of economical sciences, professor at the department of Information Technology and Modeling

155 Nikitina str., Novosibirsk, 630039



E. ­N. Antonyants
Novosibirsk State Agrarian University
Russian Federation

Egor N. Antonyants – assistant professor at the department of Automated Control Systems

20 Karl Marks ave., Novosibirsk, 630073



References

1. Burtseva S.S., Yadrikhinskaya E.E. Application of digital services and generative neural networks in teaching Russian as a foreign language. Vestnik Severo-Vostochnogo federal’nogo universiteta im. M.K. Ammosova. Seriya: Pedagogika. Psikhologiya. Filosofiya, 2024, no. 2 (34), pp. 5–18. (In Russ.)

2. Zhukovskaya I.E. Digital platforms as an important aspect of higher education digitalization. Otkrytoe obrazovanie, 2022, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 30–40. (In Russ.)

3. Gruzdeva M.L., Feofanova T.D. Possibilities of using digital platforms in education. Sovremennye naukoemkie tekhnologii, 2022, vol. 6, pp. 104–108. (In Russ.)

4. Semenov A.L. Effective education of an expanded personality in a transparent world on a digital platform. Gertsenovskie chteniya: psikhologicheskie issledovaniya v obrazovanii, 2020, no. 3, pp. 590–596. (In Russ.).

5. Chaudhary S. AI at Your Service: Generative Artificial Intelligence and the Next Generation of Assistants. Artificial Intelligence for Business (AixB), IEEE, 2024, pp. 51–52.

6. Challa K. Artificial Intelligence and Generative Neural Systems: Creating Smarter Customer Support Models for Digital Financial Services. Journal of Computational Analysis & Applications, 2024, vol. 33, no. 8.

7. Alqahtani T. et al. The emergent role of artificial intelligence, natural learning processing, and large language models in higher education and research. Research in social and administrative pharmacy, 2023, vol. 19, no. 8, pp. 1236–1242.

8. Osipenko L.E., Korotkov A.V. Text generative neural networks in students’ research activities. Mir nauki, kul’tury, obrazovaniya, 2024, no. 4 (107), pp. 90–93. (In Russ.)

9. Cecilio-Fernandes D., Sandars J. The hallucination of learning with generative artificial intelligence. Medical Teacher, 2025, pp. 1–1.

10. Kosmyna N. et al. Your brain on chatgpt: Accumulation of cognitive debt when using an ai assistant for essay writing task. arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.08872, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2506.08872.

11. Qureshi R. et al. Thinking Beyond Tokens: From Brain-Inspired Intelligence to Cognitive Foundations for Artificial General Intelligence and its Societal Impact. arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.00951, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2507.00951.

12. El Moussaoui M. Future Illiteracies – Architectural Epistemology and Artificial Intelligence. Architecture, 2025, vol. 5, no. 3, p. 53.

13. Aghaziarati A., Rahimi H. The Future of Digital Assistants: Human Dependence and Behavioral Change. Journal of Foresight and Health Governance, 2025, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 52–61.

14. Packin N.G., Chagal-Feferkorn K. This is not a game: The addictive allure of digital companions. Seattle UL Rev, 2024, vol. 48, p. 693.

15. Addae R.K., Brown C. The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Enhancing Human Longevity: Mitigating Cognitive Overload for Extended Lifespan Among Master’s Students in Mathematics at the Catholic University of Ghana. Golden Ratio of Social Science and Education, 2025, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 302–318.

16. Zhukov A.D. Generative artificial intelligence in the educational process: challenges and prospects. Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta kul’tury i iskusstv, 2023, no. 5 (115), pp. 66–75. (In Russ.).

17. Kuznetsova I.G., Glotko A.V., Aletdinova A.A. Emotional intelligence of agricultural workers. Ekonomika, trud, upravlenie v sel’skom khozyaistve, 2023, no. 12, p. 106. (In Russ.)

18. Konstantinova L.V. et al. Generative artificial intelligence in education: discussions and forecasts. Otkrytoe obrazovanie, 2023, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 36–48. (In Russ.)

19. Rodrigues D. The AI Revolution in Education: From Cognitive Enhancement to Hybrid Intelligence. SSRN, no. 5327624, 2025. URL: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=5327624 (accessed 01.07.2025).

20. Kurzweil R. The singularity is near. Ethics and emerging technologies, London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2005, pp. 393–406.


Supplementary files

For citation: Aletdinova A.A., Antonyants E.­. The use of generative neural network assistants in the educational process: threats and new opportunities. Professional education in the modern world. 2025;15(2):305-313. https://doi.org/10.20913/2618-7515-2025-2-12

Views: 3

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2224-1841 (Print)