Digital culture and value aspects of Russian education: anthropological context


https://doi.org/10.20913/2618-7515-2025-2-4

Full Text:




Abstract

Introduction. The article examines the concept of «digital culture», considers the periods of digital culture formation associated with the social and technological society`s development. It is noted that the emerging innovative model of education in the digital technologies context influences the qualitative changes in the value aspects of the domestic educational segment. Purpose setting. The relevance of considering this problem is associated with the modernization of the domestic education system in the digitalization context and the consequences that affect Russian higher education. Methodology and methods of the study. The article shows that the digital technologies development, on the one hand, is assessed as a progressive step towards an open, global society based on common goals and values, and on the other, there is criticism of digitalization processes leading to consciousness manipulation, loss of a person's own «I», an identity crisis. Results. The article emphasizes the position that innovations should be viewed as a process of «creative destruction», since technological achievements and developments inevitably entail various kinds of conflicts and problems and, at the same time, as creation. The way out of this situation seems to be digital anthropology, which acts as a person's existence in the online space, which determines everyday social norms of human life. Conclusion. In the context of new digital realities, reforming Russian education is inevitable. However, what will be the results and consequences of using the digitalization process: whether a person goes beyond his limits (i.e. to a new point of growth) or degradation will depend on the person himself, his formed values and goals.


About the Author

O. ­V. Tsiguleva
Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University
Russian Federation

Olesya V. Tsiguleva – candidate of pedagogical sciences, associate professor, the head of the foreign languages department

28 Vilyuyskaya str., Novosibirsk, 630126



References

1. Strokov A.A. Digitalization of Education: Problems and Prospects. Bulletin of Minsk Universitety, 2020, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 15–29. (in Russ.)

2. Stepanyuk V.K. «Economic» and «Digital» Man: Transformation of Human Nature in the Context of Globalization. Proceedings of Gomel State University named after F. Skoriny, 2020, no. 4 (121), pp. 159–163. (in Russ.)

3. Appakova-Shogina N.Z. Axiological Aspects of Digitalization of the Educational Environment. Philosophy of Education, 2023, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 60–76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15372/PHE20230404 (in Russ.)

4. Skowronski K.P. Philosophy in Digital Culture: Images and the Aestheticization of the Public Intellectual’s Narratives. Eidos. A Journal for Philosophy of Culture, 2020, vol. 4 (1), pp. 23–37.

5. Chernykh S.I., Borisenko I.G. Digital technologies in education and their impact on changes in human capital. Philosophy of Education, 2020, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 5–20. (in Russ.)

6. StrokovA.A. Digital culture and values of Russian education: dis. … Candidate of Philosophical Sciences. Nizhny Novgorod, 2021, 165 p. (in Russ.)

7. Khlap A.A. Technogenic ideal in digital culture: construction of a research model. Bulletin of Minsk Universitety, 2022, vol. 10, no. 1, p. 14. (in Russ.)

8. Schwab K. Technologies of the Fourth Industrial Revolution: [translated from English]. Moscow, Eksmo Publ., 2018, 320 p. (in Russ.)

9. Sarapultseva A.V. Actual aspects of the analysis of the phenomenon of digital culture. URL: https://elar.urfu.ru/bitstream/10995/119953/1/978–5–7996–3584-8_2022_023.pdf (accessed 08.04.2024) (in Russ.)

10. Tikhonova S.V. Digital society and digital anthropology: transdisciplinary foundations of social and epistemological research. Bulletin of Saratov Universitety, Seria: Philosophy. Philology. Pedagogics, 2019, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 287–290. DOI 10.18500/1819–7671–2019–19-3-287–290 (in Russ.)

11. Sorochaikin I.A. Man in the Age of Digital Reality. Expert: Theory and Practice, 2021, no. 4 (13), pp. 42–45. DOI 10.51608/26867818_2021_4_42. (in Russ.)

12. Elkina E.E. Autotrophic project – a response to the challenges and global risks of the digital age. Mysl: Journal of the St. Petersburg Philosophical Society, 2020, no. 22, pp. 57–70. (in Russ.)

13. Melikyan M.A. Noosphericity and informationality of man: philosophical and anthropological understanding of the new human quality. Bulletin of Ivanovo Univesitety. Seria: Gumanitarian Sciences, 2018, no. 2 (18), pp. 68–78. (in Russ.)

14. Simon Reid-Henry. A. Escobar: a post-development thinker to be recockened with. The Guardian https. URL: www.theguardian.com/global-development/2012/nov/05/arturo-escobar-post-development-thinker (accessed 09.07.2024).

15. Ravochkin N.N. Digital anthropology: theoretical foundation and the search for new models of man. Russian Gumanitarniirian Journal, 2023, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 19–29. DOI: 10.15643/libartrus-2023.1.2 (in Russ.)


Supplementary files

For citation: Tsiguleva O.­. Digital culture and value aspects of Russian education: anthropological context. Professional education in the modern world. 2025;15(2):239-244. https://doi.org/10.20913/2618-7515-2025-2-4

Views: 7

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2224-1841 (Print)