.png)
.png)
Email this article 
Trust as a necessary condition for socio-cultural communication in the digital age
https://doi.org/10.20913/2618-7515-2025-2-3
Abstract
Introduction. The article discusses psychological, sociological, and cultural approaches to understanding the phenomenon of trust. Purpose setting. The task was to describe the mechanism of trust formation and its manifestation in various situations of socio-cultural communications. Methodology and methods of the study. The philosophical-comparative method is applied: the method of comparative analysis of various conceptualizations in modern socio-critical thought of the phenomenon of trust, as well as an analysis of the axiological aspects of this phenomenon in relation to digital technologies in some areas of social reality. Results. Trust is considered as a manifestation of the subjectivity of the person himself. It is emphasized that trust is a situation of discovering oneself as a subject, which is a necessary condition for the content of the processes of socio – cultural identification and self-identification. The applied significance of the phenomenon of trust has been revealed, namely, understanding the boundaries of possible digital technological expansion in various spheres of socio-cultural life. When using digital technologies, the human-to-human sphere is particularly sensitive and critical. Replacing a person with a digital resource erodes the responsibility of those who use this technology in their production and organizational processes, and, as a result, reduces trust or completely destroys it. Anonymity, irresponsibility, and lack of choice are the grounds for the impossibility of trust in front of this digital innovation. Conclusion. Digitalization as a technological process should be carefully applied in the fields of education, medicine and artistic and creative activities
Keywords
About the Author
L. Yu. KonnikovaRussian Federation
Liliya Yu. Konnikova – candidate of culturology, associate professor of the department of philosophy
90 Mira Ave., Krasnoyarsk, 660049
References
1. Bromiley P., Cummings L.L. Transaction costs in organizations with trust. Research on Negotiation in Organizations. Eds.R. Bies, R. Lewicki, B. Sheppard. Greenwich, CT: JAI Publ., 1996, vol. 5, pp. 219–247.
2. Kramer R.M. Trust and Distrust in Organizations: Emerging Perspectives, Enduring Questions. Annual Reviews Psychology, 1999, vol. 50, pp. 569–598.
3. Levis D., Weigert A.J. Trust as social reality. Social Forces, June 1985, vol. 63, is. 4, pp. 967–985.
4. McAllister D.J. Two faces of interpersonal trust. Research on negotiation in organizations. Vol. 6. Eds.R. J. Lewicki, R.J. Bies, B.H. Sheppard. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press Publ., 1997, pp. 87–112.
5. Tyler T.R., Degoey P. Trust in organizational authorities: the influence of motive attributions on willingness to accept decisions. Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of theory and research. Eds.R. M. Kramer, T.R. Tyler. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publ., 1996, pp. 331–357.
6. Giddens E. Sociology. Translated from English; scientific ref. E.V. Grunt; scientific ed. L.N. Kogan, G.E. Zborovsky; prev. G.E. Zborovsky. Ural-Siberian Regional House of Economic and Scientific-technical propaganda, Ural branch of the Soviet Sociological Association, 1991, 276 p. (In Russ.)
7. Zimmel’ G. Favorites. Vol. 1. Philosophy of culture. Moscow, Yurist Publ., 1996, 671 p. (In Russ.)
8. Veber M. Selected works. Translated from German; comp., general ed. and afterword by Y.N. Davydov; preface by P.P. Gaidenko; comment by A.F. Filippov. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1990, 808 p. (In Russ.)
9. Gofman A.B. Emil Durkheim in Russia: Reception of Durkheim’s sociology in Russian social thought. Moscow, Higher School of Economics, 2001, 100 p. (In Russ.)
10. Parsons T. On social systems. Moscow, Akademicheskij proekt Publ., 2002, 832 p. (In Russ.)
11. Darendorff R. Tropes and utopias. Transl. from German B.M. Skuratova, V.L. Bliznekova. Moscow, Praksis Publ., 2002, 536 p. (In Russ.)
12. Shtompka P. Trust: a sociological theory. Sociological Review, 2002, vol. 2, no. 3. (In Russ.)
13. Fukuyama F. Trust; social virtues and the way. Moscow, Izdatel’stvo ACT: Ermak Publ., 2004, 730 p. (In Russ.)
14. Seligman A. The problem of trust. Moscow, Ideya-Press Publ., 2002, 256 p. (In Russ.)
15. Luhmann N. Forms of assistance in the process of changing social conditions. Sociological Journal, 2000, no. 1/2. (In Russ.)
16. Beck U. The government and its opponents in the era of globalism. The New Global Political Economy. Moscow, Progress-Tradiciya Publ., 2007, 464 p. (In Russ.)
17. Kozyreva P.M. Interpersonal trust in the context of the formation of social capital. Sociological Issues, 2009, no. 1, pp. 43–54. (In Russ.)
18. Makeev V.A. Strategy for the development of business reputation and its impact on the image of the organization. Power, 2009, no. 3, pp. 52–56. (In Russ.)
19. Spiritual foundations of society: collection. S.L. Frank. Moscow, Respublika Publ., 1992, 510 p. (In Russ.)
20. Kant I. Fundamentals of the metaphysics of morality. Transl. from Germsn B. Fohta, N. Sokolova]. Moscow, Izdatel’stvo AST Publ., 2023, 384 p. (In Russ.)
21. Nietzsche F. I wrote in 2 vols. Transl. from German. Moscow, Mysl’ Publ., 1996. (In Russ.)
22. Schopenhauer A. On freedom of will; On the basis of morality. Transl. from German Yu. Ajhenval’da. Moscow, Izdatel’stvo AST Publ., 2023, 448 p. (In Russ.)
23. Mamardashvili M.K. Philosophical readings. St. Petersburg, Azbuka-klassika Publ., 2002, 832 p. (In Russ.)
24. Berdyaev N.A. Man and machine. Put’, 1933, no. 38, pp. 3–38. (In Russ.)
25. Jaspers K. The meaning and purpose of history. Transl. from German. Moscow, Politizdat Publ., 1991, 527 p. (In Russ.)
26. Toffler E. The third wave. Moscow, Izdatet’stvo ACT Publ., 1999, 784 p. (In Russ.)
27. White L. Favorites: The evolution of culture. Transl. from English. Moscow, Rossijskay a politicheskay a enciklopediya (ROSSPEN) Publ., 2004, 1064 p. (In Russ.)
28. Yakovets Yu.V. The Great Scientific revolution of the XXI century. Moscow, MISK Publ., 2010, 78 p. (In Russ.)
29. Astaf’eva O. N., Zubanova L.B., Kirillova N.B., Nikonorova E.V., Shlykova O.V. The information age as the basis for the formation. Information age: new paradigms of culture and education: monograph; ed. N.B. Kirillova. Ekaterinburg: Izd-vo Ural. un-t, 2019, 292 p. (In Russ.)
30. Bodalev A.A. Perception of a human being. Leningrad, Izdvo LGU, 1965, 124 p. (In Russ.)
Supplementary files
For citation: Konnikova L.Y. Trust as a necessary condition for socio-cultural communication in the digital age. Professional education in the modern world. 2025;15(2):232-238. https://doi.org/10.20913/2618-7515-2025-2-3
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
